Sexual selection and the evolution of song.

William Searcy, M. Andersson

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

439 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although acoustically very different, the songs of birds, frogs and insects have many functional similarities, affecting both female choice of mate and male contests. Probable functions of female response to song in certain species are reproductive isolation, enhancement of material benefits or fertility, and improvement of offspring fitness. Ensuring species identity is a likely function of male response to song; estimation of aggressive intentions or resource holding power are other possibilities. -from Authors

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationAnnual review of ecology and systematics. Vol. 17
EditorsR.F. Johnston
PublisherAnnual Reviews Inc.
Pages507-533
Number of pages27
StatePublished - Dec 1 1986
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

song
sexual selection
reproductive isolation
frog
fertility
fitness
insect
bird
resource

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)
  • Environmental Science(all)

Cite this

Searcy, W., & Andersson, M. (1986). Sexual selection and the evolution of song. In R. F. Johnston (Ed.), Annual review of ecology and systematics. Vol. 17 (pp. 507-533). Annual Reviews Inc..

Sexual selection and the evolution of song. / Searcy, William; Andersson, M.

Annual review of ecology and systematics. Vol. 17. ed. / R.F. Johnston. Annual Reviews Inc., 1986. p. 507-533.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Searcy, W & Andersson, M 1986, Sexual selection and the evolution of song. in RF Johnston (ed.), Annual review of ecology and systematics. Vol. 17. Annual Reviews Inc., pp. 507-533.
Searcy W, Andersson M. Sexual selection and the evolution of song. In Johnston RF, editor, Annual review of ecology and systematics. Vol. 17. Annual Reviews Inc. 1986. p. 507-533
Searcy, William ; Andersson, M. / Sexual selection and the evolution of song. Annual review of ecology and systematics. Vol. 17. editor / R.F. Johnston. Annual Reviews Inc., 1986. pp. 507-533
@inbook{54f6aa3f5e864180841574f4f84bd63e,
title = "Sexual selection and the evolution of song.",
abstract = "Although acoustically very different, the songs of birds, frogs and insects have many functional similarities, affecting both female choice of mate and male contests. Probable functions of female response to song in certain species are reproductive isolation, enhancement of material benefits or fertility, and improvement of offspring fitness. Ensuring species identity is a likely function of male response to song; estimation of aggressive intentions or resource holding power are other possibilities. -from Authors",
author = "William Searcy and M. Andersson",
year = "1986",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English",
pages = "507--533",
editor = "R.F. Johnston",
booktitle = "Annual review of ecology and systematics. Vol. 17",
publisher = "Annual Reviews Inc.",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Sexual selection and the evolution of song.

AU - Searcy, William

AU - Andersson, M.

PY - 1986/12/1

Y1 - 1986/12/1

N2 - Although acoustically very different, the songs of birds, frogs and insects have many functional similarities, affecting both female choice of mate and male contests. Probable functions of female response to song in certain species are reproductive isolation, enhancement of material benefits or fertility, and improvement of offspring fitness. Ensuring species identity is a likely function of male response to song; estimation of aggressive intentions or resource holding power are other possibilities. -from Authors

AB - Although acoustically very different, the songs of birds, frogs and insects have many functional similarities, affecting both female choice of mate and male contests. Probable functions of female response to song in certain species are reproductive isolation, enhancement of material benefits or fertility, and improvement of offspring fitness. Ensuring species identity is a likely function of male response to song; estimation of aggressive intentions or resource holding power are other possibilities. -from Authors

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022847647&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022847647&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Chapter

SP - 507

EP - 533

BT - Annual review of ecology and systematics. Vol. 17

A2 - Johnston, R.F.

PB - Annual Reviews Inc.

ER -