Sexual, psychological and dyadic qualities of the prostate cancer 'couple'

Cynthia T. Soloway, Mark S. Soloway, Sandy S. Kim, Bruce Kava

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

103 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine the levels of sexual, psychological and dyadic functioning of the prostate cancer 'couple' (as studies have shown that spouses/partners play an integral role in the patient's adjustment to prostate cancer treatment), to encourage the creation of innovative psychosexual interventions to be used in the outpatient setting, and to offer insights into a novel area of prostate cancer research. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 103 men newly diagnosed with prostate cancer, and their partners, were assessed in an academic outpatient setting using instruments measuring sexual function, depressed mood, psychological distress and dyadic adjustment RESULTS: The partners' mean scores on sexual function questions were 55.75, significantly higher than those of the patients (51.7, P=0.018), showing that partners perceived their sexual performance at a better level. Partners' mean scores on the depression and distress measures were also significantly higher. On those items that monitored the accuracy of the patients' perceptions of their sexual function, partners rated the patients significantly lower in ability to gain erections (patient/partner means 2.67/4.52; P < 0.001) and to perform sexually (patient/partner means 1.38/4.68; P< 0.001) than they rated themselves. CONCLUSIONS: Information from this study could be useful in constructing interventions that allow the physician and the prostate cancer 'couple' to reflect on issues of sexual function and psychological distress that might once have been considered taboo. The results characterize the disparities between patients with prostate cancer and their partners on self-reported questionnaires, and underscore how important it is to hear the voice of the 'couple'.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)780-785
Number of pages6
JournalBJU International
Volume95
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2005

Fingerprint

Prostatic Neoplasms
Psychology
Social Adjustment
Outpatients
Taboo
Aptitude
Sexual Partners
Spouses
Depression
Physicians
Research

Keywords

  • Depression
  • Marital quality
  • Prostate cancer
  • Psychological distress
  • Sexual function

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Sexual, psychological and dyadic qualities of the prostate cancer 'couple'. / Soloway, Cynthia T.; Soloway, Mark S.; Kim, Sandy S.; Kava, Bruce.

In: BJU International, Vol. 95, No. 6, 01.04.2005, p. 780-785.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Soloway, Cynthia T. ; Soloway, Mark S. ; Kim, Sandy S. ; Kava, Bruce. / Sexual, psychological and dyadic qualities of the prostate cancer 'couple'. In: BJU International. 2005 ; Vol. 95, No. 6. pp. 780-785.
@article{862896a6fd884b99a19509ee04c8c9bf,
title = "Sexual, psychological and dyadic qualities of the prostate cancer 'couple'",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: To examine the levels of sexual, psychological and dyadic functioning of the prostate cancer 'couple' (as studies have shown that spouses/partners play an integral role in the patient's adjustment to prostate cancer treatment), to encourage the creation of innovative psychosexual interventions to be used in the outpatient setting, and to offer insights into a novel area of prostate cancer research. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 103 men newly diagnosed with prostate cancer, and their partners, were assessed in an academic outpatient setting using instruments measuring sexual function, depressed mood, psychological distress and dyadic adjustment RESULTS: The partners' mean scores on sexual function questions were 55.75, significantly higher than those of the patients (51.7, P=0.018), showing that partners perceived their sexual performance at a better level. Partners' mean scores on the depression and distress measures were also significantly higher. On those items that monitored the accuracy of the patients' perceptions of their sexual function, partners rated the patients significantly lower in ability to gain erections (patient/partner means 2.67/4.52; P < 0.001) and to perform sexually (patient/partner means 1.38/4.68; P< 0.001) than they rated themselves. CONCLUSIONS: Information from this study could be useful in constructing interventions that allow the physician and the prostate cancer 'couple' to reflect on issues of sexual function and psychological distress that might once have been considered taboo. The results characterize the disparities between patients with prostate cancer and their partners on self-reported questionnaires, and underscore how important it is to hear the voice of the 'couple'.",
keywords = "Depression, Marital quality, Prostate cancer, Psychological distress, Sexual function",
author = "Soloway, {Cynthia T.} and Soloway, {Mark S.} and Kim, {Sandy S.} and Bruce Kava",
year = "2005",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05400.x",
language = "English",
volume = "95",
pages = "780--785",
journal = "BJU International",
issn = "1464-4096",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sexual, psychological and dyadic qualities of the prostate cancer 'couple'

AU - Soloway, Cynthia T.

AU - Soloway, Mark S.

AU - Kim, Sandy S.

AU - Kava, Bruce

PY - 2005/4/1

Y1 - 2005/4/1

N2 - OBJECTIVES: To examine the levels of sexual, psychological and dyadic functioning of the prostate cancer 'couple' (as studies have shown that spouses/partners play an integral role in the patient's adjustment to prostate cancer treatment), to encourage the creation of innovative psychosexual interventions to be used in the outpatient setting, and to offer insights into a novel area of prostate cancer research. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 103 men newly diagnosed with prostate cancer, and their partners, were assessed in an academic outpatient setting using instruments measuring sexual function, depressed mood, psychological distress and dyadic adjustment RESULTS: The partners' mean scores on sexual function questions were 55.75, significantly higher than those of the patients (51.7, P=0.018), showing that partners perceived their sexual performance at a better level. Partners' mean scores on the depression and distress measures were also significantly higher. On those items that monitored the accuracy of the patients' perceptions of their sexual function, partners rated the patients significantly lower in ability to gain erections (patient/partner means 2.67/4.52; P < 0.001) and to perform sexually (patient/partner means 1.38/4.68; P< 0.001) than they rated themselves. CONCLUSIONS: Information from this study could be useful in constructing interventions that allow the physician and the prostate cancer 'couple' to reflect on issues of sexual function and psychological distress that might once have been considered taboo. The results characterize the disparities between patients with prostate cancer and their partners on self-reported questionnaires, and underscore how important it is to hear the voice of the 'couple'.

AB - OBJECTIVES: To examine the levels of sexual, psychological and dyadic functioning of the prostate cancer 'couple' (as studies have shown that spouses/partners play an integral role in the patient's adjustment to prostate cancer treatment), to encourage the creation of innovative psychosexual interventions to be used in the outpatient setting, and to offer insights into a novel area of prostate cancer research. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 103 men newly diagnosed with prostate cancer, and their partners, were assessed in an academic outpatient setting using instruments measuring sexual function, depressed mood, psychological distress and dyadic adjustment RESULTS: The partners' mean scores on sexual function questions were 55.75, significantly higher than those of the patients (51.7, P=0.018), showing that partners perceived their sexual performance at a better level. Partners' mean scores on the depression and distress measures were also significantly higher. On those items that monitored the accuracy of the patients' perceptions of their sexual function, partners rated the patients significantly lower in ability to gain erections (patient/partner means 2.67/4.52; P < 0.001) and to perform sexually (patient/partner means 1.38/4.68; P< 0.001) than they rated themselves. CONCLUSIONS: Information from this study could be useful in constructing interventions that allow the physician and the prostate cancer 'couple' to reflect on issues of sexual function and psychological distress that might once have been considered taboo. The results characterize the disparities between patients with prostate cancer and their partners on self-reported questionnaires, and underscore how important it is to hear the voice of the 'couple'.

KW - Depression

KW - Marital quality

KW - Prostate cancer

KW - Psychological distress

KW - Sexual function

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=17444418615&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=17444418615&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05400.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05400.x

M3 - Article

VL - 95

SP - 780

EP - 785

JO - BJU International

JF - BJU International

SN - 1464-4096

IS - 6

ER -