Abstract
Beekhuizen KS, Field-Fote EC. Sensory stimulation augments the effects of massed practice training in persons with tetraplegia. Objective: To compare functional changes and cortical neuroplasticity associated with hand and upper extremity use after massed (repetitive task-oriented practice) training, somatosensory stimulation, massed practice training combined with somatosensory stimulation, or no intervention, in persons with chronic incomplete tetraplegia. Design: Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 groups: massed practice training combined with somatosensory peripheral nerve stimulation (MP+SS), somatosensory peripheral nerve stimulation only (SS), massed practice training only (MP), and no intervention (control). Setting: University medical school setting. Participants: Twenty-four subjects with chronic incomplete tetraplegia. Interventions: Intervention sessions were 2 hours per session, 5 days a week for 3 weeks. Massed practice training consisted of repetitive practice of functional tasks requiring skilled hand and upper-extremity use. Somatosensory stimulation consisted of median nerve stimulation with intensity set below motor threshold. Main Outcome Measures: Pre- and post-testing assessed changes in functional hand use (Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test), functional upper-extremity use (Wolf Motor Function Test), pinch grip strength (key pinch force), sensory function (monofilament testing), and changes in cortical excitation (motor evoked potential threshold). Results: The 3 groups showed significant improvements in hand function after training. The MP+SS and SS groups had significant improvements in upper-extremity function and pinch strength compared with the control group, but only the MP+SS group had a significant change in sensory scores compared with the control group. The MP+SS and MP groups had greater change in threshold measures of cortical excitability. Conclusions: People with chronic incomplete tetraplegia obtain functional benefits from massed practice of task-oriented skills. Somatosensory stimulation appears to be a valuable adjunct to training programs designed to improve hand and upper-extremity function in these subjects.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 602-608 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation |
| Volume | 89 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Apr 1 2008 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- Hand
- Motor skills
- Neuronal plasticity
- Rehabilitation
- Spinal cord injuries
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Rehabilitation
Cite this
Sensory Stimulation Augments the Effects of Massed Practice Training in Persons With Tetraplegia. / Beekhuizen, Kristina S.; Field-Fote, Edelle C.
In: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 89, No. 4, 01.04.2008, p. 602-608.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Sensory Stimulation Augments the Effects of Massed Practice Training in Persons With Tetraplegia
AU - Beekhuizen, Kristina S.
AU - Field-Fote, Edelle C.
PY - 2008/4/1
Y1 - 2008/4/1
N2 - Beekhuizen KS, Field-Fote EC. Sensory stimulation augments the effects of massed practice training in persons with tetraplegia. Objective: To compare functional changes and cortical neuroplasticity associated with hand and upper extremity use after massed (repetitive task-oriented practice) training, somatosensory stimulation, massed practice training combined with somatosensory stimulation, or no intervention, in persons with chronic incomplete tetraplegia. Design: Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 groups: massed practice training combined with somatosensory peripheral nerve stimulation (MP+SS), somatosensory peripheral nerve stimulation only (SS), massed practice training only (MP), and no intervention (control). Setting: University medical school setting. Participants: Twenty-four subjects with chronic incomplete tetraplegia. Interventions: Intervention sessions were 2 hours per session, 5 days a week for 3 weeks. Massed practice training consisted of repetitive practice of functional tasks requiring skilled hand and upper-extremity use. Somatosensory stimulation consisted of median nerve stimulation with intensity set below motor threshold. Main Outcome Measures: Pre- and post-testing assessed changes in functional hand use (Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test), functional upper-extremity use (Wolf Motor Function Test), pinch grip strength (key pinch force), sensory function (monofilament testing), and changes in cortical excitation (motor evoked potential threshold). Results: The 3 groups showed significant improvements in hand function after training. The MP+SS and SS groups had significant improvements in upper-extremity function and pinch strength compared with the control group, but only the MP+SS group had a significant change in sensory scores compared with the control group. The MP+SS and MP groups had greater change in threshold measures of cortical excitability. Conclusions: People with chronic incomplete tetraplegia obtain functional benefits from massed practice of task-oriented skills. Somatosensory stimulation appears to be a valuable adjunct to training programs designed to improve hand and upper-extremity function in these subjects.
AB - Beekhuizen KS, Field-Fote EC. Sensory stimulation augments the effects of massed practice training in persons with tetraplegia. Objective: To compare functional changes and cortical neuroplasticity associated with hand and upper extremity use after massed (repetitive task-oriented practice) training, somatosensory stimulation, massed practice training combined with somatosensory stimulation, or no intervention, in persons with chronic incomplete tetraplegia. Design: Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 groups: massed practice training combined with somatosensory peripheral nerve stimulation (MP+SS), somatosensory peripheral nerve stimulation only (SS), massed practice training only (MP), and no intervention (control). Setting: University medical school setting. Participants: Twenty-four subjects with chronic incomplete tetraplegia. Interventions: Intervention sessions were 2 hours per session, 5 days a week for 3 weeks. Massed practice training consisted of repetitive practice of functional tasks requiring skilled hand and upper-extremity use. Somatosensory stimulation consisted of median nerve stimulation with intensity set below motor threshold. Main Outcome Measures: Pre- and post-testing assessed changes in functional hand use (Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test), functional upper-extremity use (Wolf Motor Function Test), pinch grip strength (key pinch force), sensory function (monofilament testing), and changes in cortical excitation (motor evoked potential threshold). Results: The 3 groups showed significant improvements in hand function after training. The MP+SS and SS groups had significant improvements in upper-extremity function and pinch strength compared with the control group, but only the MP+SS group had a significant change in sensory scores compared with the control group. The MP+SS and MP groups had greater change in threshold measures of cortical excitability. Conclusions: People with chronic incomplete tetraplegia obtain functional benefits from massed practice of task-oriented skills. Somatosensory stimulation appears to be a valuable adjunct to training programs designed to improve hand and upper-extremity function in these subjects.
KW - Hand
KW - Motor skills
KW - Neuronal plasticity
KW - Rehabilitation
KW - Spinal cord injuries
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=40949099142&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=40949099142&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.021
DO - 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.021
M3 - Article
C2 - 18373988
AN - SCOPUS:40949099142
VL - 89
SP - 602
EP - 608
JO - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
JF - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
SN - 0003-9993
IS - 4
ER -