Sensitivity and specificity of a diagnostic test determined by repeated observations in the absence of an external standard

Michael Schulzer, Douglas Anderson, Stephen M. Drance

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Traditionally, the sensitivity and specificity of a new diagnostic test are derived from its application to two groups of individuals known to have or not to have met the criterion to be detected as judged by means of a "gold standard", some external time-honored test. In this study, a test with unknown accuracy parameters was used to detect an end-point criterion in an ongoing ophthalmological clinical trial. Since no external test method was available to assess the accuracy of this test, equations were derived relating the unknown sensitivity and specificity of the test to data frequencies based on replicate measurements. The solutions to these equations also provided estimates of the incidence rate of the criterion under investigation in the group tested, and of the predictive values of the test. The validity of this method of estimation is discussed, and applications to other situations are suggested.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1167-1179
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume44
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1991

Fingerprint

Routine Diagnostic Tests
Predictive Value of Tests
Sensitivity and Specificity
Clinical Trials
Incidence

Keywords

  • Incidence predictive values
  • Multivariate binomial distribution
  • Sensitivity
  • Specificity
  • Test criterion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Epidemiology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Sensitivity and specificity of a diagnostic test determined by repeated observations in the absence of an external standard. / Schulzer, Michael; Anderson, Douglas; Drance, Stephen M.

In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 44, No. 11, 01.01.1991, p. 1167-1179.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schulzer, Michael ; Anderson, Douglas ; Drance, Stephen M. / Sensitivity and specificity of a diagnostic test determined by repeated observations in the absence of an external standard. In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1991 ; Vol. 44, No. 11. pp. 1167-1179.
@article{099b5f8dd6fa491ca30ba517c8fb5e41,
title = "Sensitivity and specificity of a diagnostic test determined by repeated observations in the absence of an external standard",
abstract = "Traditionally, the sensitivity and specificity of a new diagnostic test are derived from its application to two groups of individuals known to have or not to have met the criterion to be detected as judged by means of a {"}gold standard{"}, some external time-honored test. In this study, a test with unknown accuracy parameters was used to detect an end-point criterion in an ongoing ophthalmological clinical trial. Since no external test method was available to assess the accuracy of this test, equations were derived relating the unknown sensitivity and specificity of the test to data frequencies based on replicate measurements. The solutions to these equations also provided estimates of the incidence rate of the criterion under investigation in the group tested, and of the predictive values of the test. The validity of this method of estimation is discussed, and applications to other situations are suggested.",
keywords = "Incidence predictive values, Multivariate binomial distribution, Sensitivity, Specificity, Test criterion",
author = "Michael Schulzer and Douglas Anderson and Drance, {Stephen M.}",
year = "1991",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/0895-4356(91)90149-4",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "1167--1179",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Epidemiology",
issn = "0895-4356",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sensitivity and specificity of a diagnostic test determined by repeated observations in the absence of an external standard

AU - Schulzer, Michael

AU - Anderson, Douglas

AU - Drance, Stephen M.

PY - 1991/1/1

Y1 - 1991/1/1

N2 - Traditionally, the sensitivity and specificity of a new diagnostic test are derived from its application to two groups of individuals known to have or not to have met the criterion to be detected as judged by means of a "gold standard", some external time-honored test. In this study, a test with unknown accuracy parameters was used to detect an end-point criterion in an ongoing ophthalmological clinical trial. Since no external test method was available to assess the accuracy of this test, equations were derived relating the unknown sensitivity and specificity of the test to data frequencies based on replicate measurements. The solutions to these equations also provided estimates of the incidence rate of the criterion under investigation in the group tested, and of the predictive values of the test. The validity of this method of estimation is discussed, and applications to other situations are suggested.

AB - Traditionally, the sensitivity and specificity of a new diagnostic test are derived from its application to two groups of individuals known to have or not to have met the criterion to be detected as judged by means of a "gold standard", some external time-honored test. In this study, a test with unknown accuracy parameters was used to detect an end-point criterion in an ongoing ophthalmological clinical trial. Since no external test method was available to assess the accuracy of this test, equations were derived relating the unknown sensitivity and specificity of the test to data frequencies based on replicate measurements. The solutions to these equations also provided estimates of the incidence rate of the criterion under investigation in the group tested, and of the predictive values of the test. The validity of this method of estimation is discussed, and applications to other situations are suggested.

KW - Incidence predictive values

KW - Multivariate binomial distribution

KW - Sensitivity

KW - Specificity

KW - Test criterion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026056282&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026056282&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0895-4356(91)90149-4

DO - 10.1016/0895-4356(91)90149-4

M3 - Article

C2 - 1789861

AN - SCOPUS:0026056282

VL - 44

SP - 1167

EP - 1179

JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

SN - 0895-4356

IS - 11

ER -