Self-discrepancies and affect

Incorporating the role of feared selves

Charles S Carver, John W. Lawrence, Michael F. Scheier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

177 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The authors examined ought, ideal, and feared self-discrepancies as predictors of agitation- and dejection-related affects. Overall, discrepancy from feared selves predicted anxiety and guilt, preempting the role of discrepancies from ought selves; ideal and feared discrepancies both predicted depression. Further analyses revealed interactions between actual-ought and actual-feared discrepancies in predicting anxiety and guilt. Among participants who were relatively near their feared selves, discrepancies from ought selves were unrelated to these affects. In contrast, among those whose feared selves were more distant, ought discrepancies did predict agitation-related affect, consistent with self-discrepancy theory. Discussion centers on a view in which an avoidance motive (feared self) dominates anxiety and guilt if the feared element is nearby but in which an associated approach motive (ought self) dominates anxiety and guilt if the feared element is more remote.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)783-792
Number of pages10
JournalPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Volume25
Issue number7
StatePublished - Jul 1 1999

Fingerprint

Guilt
Anxiety
Depression

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Self-discrepancies and affect : Incorporating the role of feared selves. / Carver, Charles S; Lawrence, John W.; Scheier, Michael F.

In: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 25, No. 7, 01.07.1999, p. 783-792.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Carver, Charles S ; Lawrence, John W. ; Scheier, Michael F. / Self-discrepancies and affect : Incorporating the role of feared selves. In: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1999 ; Vol. 25, No. 7. pp. 783-792.
@article{a8ff468be635433182a93f9655686a5a,
title = "Self-discrepancies and affect: Incorporating the role of feared selves",
abstract = "The authors examined ought, ideal, and feared self-discrepancies as predictors of agitation- and dejection-related affects. Overall, discrepancy from feared selves predicted anxiety and guilt, preempting the role of discrepancies from ought selves; ideal and feared discrepancies both predicted depression. Further analyses revealed interactions between actual-ought and actual-feared discrepancies in predicting anxiety and guilt. Among participants who were relatively near their feared selves, discrepancies from ought selves were unrelated to these affects. In contrast, among those whose feared selves were more distant, ought discrepancies did predict agitation-related affect, consistent with self-discrepancy theory. Discussion centers on a view in which an avoidance motive (feared self) dominates anxiety and guilt if the feared element is nearby but in which an associated approach motive (ought self) dominates anxiety and guilt if the feared element is more remote.",
author = "Carver, {Charles S} and Lawrence, {John W.} and Scheier, {Michael F.}",
year = "1999",
month = "7",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "783--792",
journal = "Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin",
issn = "0146-1672",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Self-discrepancies and affect

T2 - Incorporating the role of feared selves

AU - Carver, Charles S

AU - Lawrence, John W.

AU - Scheier, Michael F.

PY - 1999/7/1

Y1 - 1999/7/1

N2 - The authors examined ought, ideal, and feared self-discrepancies as predictors of agitation- and dejection-related affects. Overall, discrepancy from feared selves predicted anxiety and guilt, preempting the role of discrepancies from ought selves; ideal and feared discrepancies both predicted depression. Further analyses revealed interactions between actual-ought and actual-feared discrepancies in predicting anxiety and guilt. Among participants who were relatively near their feared selves, discrepancies from ought selves were unrelated to these affects. In contrast, among those whose feared selves were more distant, ought discrepancies did predict agitation-related affect, consistent with self-discrepancy theory. Discussion centers on a view in which an avoidance motive (feared self) dominates anxiety and guilt if the feared element is nearby but in which an associated approach motive (ought self) dominates anxiety and guilt if the feared element is more remote.

AB - The authors examined ought, ideal, and feared self-discrepancies as predictors of agitation- and dejection-related affects. Overall, discrepancy from feared selves predicted anxiety and guilt, preempting the role of discrepancies from ought selves; ideal and feared discrepancies both predicted depression. Further analyses revealed interactions between actual-ought and actual-feared discrepancies in predicting anxiety and guilt. Among participants who were relatively near their feared selves, discrepancies from ought selves were unrelated to these affects. In contrast, among those whose feared selves were more distant, ought discrepancies did predict agitation-related affect, consistent with self-discrepancy theory. Discussion centers on a view in which an avoidance motive (feared self) dominates anxiety and guilt if the feared element is nearby but in which an associated approach motive (ought self) dominates anxiety and guilt if the feared element is more remote.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033247454&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033247454&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 783

EP - 792

JO - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

JF - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

SN - 0146-1672

IS - 7

ER -