Self-assessment of functional status in schizophrenia

Christopher R. Bowie, Elizabeth W. Twamley, Hannah Anderson, Brooke Halpern, Thomas L. Patterson, Philip D Harvey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

157 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

With new treatments targeting features of schizophrenia associated with functional disability, there is a need to evaluate the validity of ratings of everyday outcomes. It is unknown whether patients can validly self-report on aspects of their functional status, which would be a potentially economical method for obtaining outcome data. In this study, 67 older schizophrenia outpatients provided self-ratings of everyday real-world functioning using the specific levels of functioning scale (SLOF). They were also administered assessments of neuropsychological performance, performance-based measures of functional capacity and social skills, clinical symptoms, and quality of life. Case managers, unaware of other ratings, also generated SLOF ratings. Based on discrepancy scores, participants were categorized as accurate raters (n = 24), underestimators (n = 16), or overestimators (n = 27) of their functional status as compared to case managers' ratings. Patients' self-rated functional status was correlated with their subjective quality of life, but remarkably unassociated with case manager ratings of functional status or their own performance on functional capacity or social skills measures. Case manager ratings, however, were highly correlated with performance on functional capacity and social skills measures. Patients who underestimated their real world performance had better cognitive skills and greater self-rated depression than those who overestimated. Accurate raters demonstrated greater social skills than both overestimators and underestimators, while overestimators were most cognitively and functionally impaired. Accurate ratings of everyday outcomes in schizophrenia may require systematic observation of real world outcomes or performance-based measures, as self-reports were inconsistent with objective information.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1012-1018
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Psychiatric Research
Volume41
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Schizophrenia
Self Report
Quality of Life
Outpatients
Observation
Depression
Case Managers
Social Skills
Self-Assessment
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Cognition
  • Functional status
  • Schizophrenia
  • Self-appraisal

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Bowie, C. R., Twamley, E. W., Anderson, H., Halpern, B., Patterson, T. L., & Harvey, P. D. (2007). Self-assessment of functional status in schizophrenia. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 41(12), 1012-1018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2006.08.003

Self-assessment of functional status in schizophrenia. / Bowie, Christopher R.; Twamley, Elizabeth W.; Anderson, Hannah; Halpern, Brooke; Patterson, Thomas L.; Harvey, Philip D.

In: Journal of Psychiatric Research, Vol. 41, No. 12, 01.12.2007, p. 1012-1018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bowie, CR, Twamley, EW, Anderson, H, Halpern, B, Patterson, TL & Harvey, PD 2007, 'Self-assessment of functional status in schizophrenia', Journal of Psychiatric Research, vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 1012-1018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2006.08.003
Bowie, Christopher R. ; Twamley, Elizabeth W. ; Anderson, Hannah ; Halpern, Brooke ; Patterson, Thomas L. ; Harvey, Philip D. / Self-assessment of functional status in schizophrenia. In: Journal of Psychiatric Research. 2007 ; Vol. 41, No. 12. pp. 1012-1018.
@article{3e96228d039e45d8a10f4eb7f6dc6ccf,
title = "Self-assessment of functional status in schizophrenia",
abstract = "With new treatments targeting features of schizophrenia associated with functional disability, there is a need to evaluate the validity of ratings of everyday outcomes. It is unknown whether patients can validly self-report on aspects of their functional status, which would be a potentially economical method for obtaining outcome data. In this study, 67 older schizophrenia outpatients provided self-ratings of everyday real-world functioning using the specific levels of functioning scale (SLOF). They were also administered assessments of neuropsychological performance, performance-based measures of functional capacity and social skills, clinical symptoms, and quality of life. Case managers, unaware of other ratings, also generated SLOF ratings. Based on discrepancy scores, participants were categorized as accurate raters (n = 24), underestimators (n = 16), or overestimators (n = 27) of their functional status as compared to case managers' ratings. Patients' self-rated functional status was correlated with their subjective quality of life, but remarkably unassociated with case manager ratings of functional status or their own performance on functional capacity or social skills measures. Case manager ratings, however, were highly correlated with performance on functional capacity and social skills measures. Patients who underestimated their real world performance had better cognitive skills and greater self-rated depression than those who overestimated. Accurate raters demonstrated greater social skills than both overestimators and underestimators, while overestimators were most cognitively and functionally impaired. Accurate ratings of everyday outcomes in schizophrenia may require systematic observation of real world outcomes or performance-based measures, as self-reports were inconsistent with objective information.",
keywords = "Cognition, Functional status, Schizophrenia, Self-appraisal",
author = "Bowie, {Christopher R.} and Twamley, {Elizabeth W.} and Hannah Anderson and Brooke Halpern and Patterson, {Thomas L.} and Harvey, {Philip D}",
year = "2007",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpsychires.2006.08.003",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "1012--1018",
journal = "Journal of Psychiatric Research",
issn = "0022-3956",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Self-assessment of functional status in schizophrenia

AU - Bowie, Christopher R.

AU - Twamley, Elizabeth W.

AU - Anderson, Hannah

AU - Halpern, Brooke

AU - Patterson, Thomas L.

AU - Harvey, Philip D

PY - 2007/12/1

Y1 - 2007/12/1

N2 - With new treatments targeting features of schizophrenia associated with functional disability, there is a need to evaluate the validity of ratings of everyday outcomes. It is unknown whether patients can validly self-report on aspects of their functional status, which would be a potentially economical method for obtaining outcome data. In this study, 67 older schizophrenia outpatients provided self-ratings of everyday real-world functioning using the specific levels of functioning scale (SLOF). They were also administered assessments of neuropsychological performance, performance-based measures of functional capacity and social skills, clinical symptoms, and quality of life. Case managers, unaware of other ratings, also generated SLOF ratings. Based on discrepancy scores, participants were categorized as accurate raters (n = 24), underestimators (n = 16), or overestimators (n = 27) of their functional status as compared to case managers' ratings. Patients' self-rated functional status was correlated with their subjective quality of life, but remarkably unassociated with case manager ratings of functional status or their own performance on functional capacity or social skills measures. Case manager ratings, however, were highly correlated with performance on functional capacity and social skills measures. Patients who underestimated their real world performance had better cognitive skills and greater self-rated depression than those who overestimated. Accurate raters demonstrated greater social skills than both overestimators and underestimators, while overestimators were most cognitively and functionally impaired. Accurate ratings of everyday outcomes in schizophrenia may require systematic observation of real world outcomes or performance-based measures, as self-reports were inconsistent with objective information.

AB - With new treatments targeting features of schizophrenia associated with functional disability, there is a need to evaluate the validity of ratings of everyday outcomes. It is unknown whether patients can validly self-report on aspects of their functional status, which would be a potentially economical method for obtaining outcome data. In this study, 67 older schizophrenia outpatients provided self-ratings of everyday real-world functioning using the specific levels of functioning scale (SLOF). They were also administered assessments of neuropsychological performance, performance-based measures of functional capacity and social skills, clinical symptoms, and quality of life. Case managers, unaware of other ratings, also generated SLOF ratings. Based on discrepancy scores, participants were categorized as accurate raters (n = 24), underestimators (n = 16), or overestimators (n = 27) of their functional status as compared to case managers' ratings. Patients' self-rated functional status was correlated with their subjective quality of life, but remarkably unassociated with case manager ratings of functional status or their own performance on functional capacity or social skills measures. Case manager ratings, however, were highly correlated with performance on functional capacity and social skills measures. Patients who underestimated their real world performance had better cognitive skills and greater self-rated depression than those who overestimated. Accurate raters demonstrated greater social skills than both overestimators and underestimators, while overestimators were most cognitively and functionally impaired. Accurate ratings of everyday outcomes in schizophrenia may require systematic observation of real world outcomes or performance-based measures, as self-reports were inconsistent with objective information.

KW - Cognition

KW - Functional status

KW - Schizophrenia

KW - Self-appraisal

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548130158&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548130158&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2006.08.003

DO - 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2006.08.003

M3 - Article

C2 - 17014866

AN - SCOPUS:34548130158

VL - 41

SP - 1012

EP - 1018

JO - Journal of Psychiatric Research

JF - Journal of Psychiatric Research

SN - 0022-3956

IS - 12

ER -