Scientific ontology: Integrating naturalized metaphysics and voluntarist epistemology

Research output: Book/ReportBook

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Both science and philosophy are interested in questions of ontology-questions about what exists and what these things are like. Science and philosophy, however, seem like very different ways of investigating the world, so how should one proceed? Some defer to the sciences, conceived as something apart from philosophy, and others to metaphysics, conceived as something apart from science, for certain kinds of answers. This book contends that these sorts of deference are misconceived. A compelling account of ontology must appreciate the ways in which the sciences incorporate metaphysical assumptions and arguments. At the same time, it must pay careful attention to how observation, experience, and the empirical dimensions of science are related to what may be viewed as defensible philosophical theorizing about ontology. The promise of an effectively naturalized metaphysics is to encourage beliefs that are formed in ways that do justice to scientific theorizing, modeling, and experimentation. But even armed with such a view, there is no one, uniquely rational way to draw lines between domains of ontology that are suitable for belief and ones in which it would be better to suspend belief instead. In crucial respects, ontology is in the eye of the beholder: it is informed by underlying commitments with implications for the limits of inquiry, which inevitably vary across rational inquirers. As result, the proper scope of ontology is subject to a striking form of voluntary choice, yielding a new and transformative conception of scientific ontology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
PublisherOxford University Press
Number of pages278
ISBN (Electronic)9780190651459
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Ontology
Metaphysics
Epistemology
Philosophy
Deference
Experimentation
Justice
Metaphysical
Conception
Modeling

Keywords

  • Deflationism
  • Empiricism
  • Epistemic stances
  • Explanatory power
  • Metaphysical inference
  • Naturalized metaphysics
  • Pragmatism
  • Realism
  • Scientific ontology
  • Voluntarism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

Scientific ontology : Integrating naturalized metaphysics and voluntarist epistemology. / Chakravartty, Anjan.

Oxford University Press, 2017. 278 p.

Research output: Book/ReportBook

@book{856745c176c1435ca04e1ae6740f6f42,
title = "Scientific ontology: Integrating naturalized metaphysics and voluntarist epistemology",
abstract = "Both science and philosophy are interested in questions of ontology-questions about what exists and what these things are like. Science and philosophy, however, seem like very different ways of investigating the world, so how should one proceed? Some defer to the sciences, conceived as something apart from philosophy, and others to metaphysics, conceived as something apart from science, for certain kinds of answers. This book contends that these sorts of deference are misconceived. A compelling account of ontology must appreciate the ways in which the sciences incorporate metaphysical assumptions and arguments. At the same time, it must pay careful attention to how observation, experience, and the empirical dimensions of science are related to what may be viewed as defensible philosophical theorizing about ontology. The promise of an effectively naturalized metaphysics is to encourage beliefs that are formed in ways that do justice to scientific theorizing, modeling, and experimentation. But even armed with such a view, there is no one, uniquely rational way to draw lines between domains of ontology that are suitable for belief and ones in which it would be better to suspend belief instead. In crucial respects, ontology is in the eye of the beholder: it is informed by underlying commitments with implications for the limits of inquiry, which inevitably vary across rational inquirers. As result, the proper scope of ontology is subject to a striking form of voluntary choice, yielding a new and transformative conception of scientific ontology.",
keywords = "Deflationism, Empiricism, Epistemic stances, Explanatory power, Metaphysical inference, Naturalized metaphysics, Pragmatism, Realism, Scientific ontology, Voluntarism",
author = "Anjan Chakravartty",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/oso/9780190651459.001.0001",
language = "English (US)",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
address = "United States",

}

TY - BOOK

T1 - Scientific ontology

T2 - Integrating naturalized metaphysics and voluntarist epistemology

AU - Chakravartty, Anjan

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Both science and philosophy are interested in questions of ontology-questions about what exists and what these things are like. Science and philosophy, however, seem like very different ways of investigating the world, so how should one proceed? Some defer to the sciences, conceived as something apart from philosophy, and others to metaphysics, conceived as something apart from science, for certain kinds of answers. This book contends that these sorts of deference are misconceived. A compelling account of ontology must appreciate the ways in which the sciences incorporate metaphysical assumptions and arguments. At the same time, it must pay careful attention to how observation, experience, and the empirical dimensions of science are related to what may be viewed as defensible philosophical theorizing about ontology. The promise of an effectively naturalized metaphysics is to encourage beliefs that are formed in ways that do justice to scientific theorizing, modeling, and experimentation. But even armed with such a view, there is no one, uniquely rational way to draw lines between domains of ontology that are suitable for belief and ones in which it would be better to suspend belief instead. In crucial respects, ontology is in the eye of the beholder: it is informed by underlying commitments with implications for the limits of inquiry, which inevitably vary across rational inquirers. As result, the proper scope of ontology is subject to a striking form of voluntary choice, yielding a new and transformative conception of scientific ontology.

AB - Both science and philosophy are interested in questions of ontology-questions about what exists and what these things are like. Science and philosophy, however, seem like very different ways of investigating the world, so how should one proceed? Some defer to the sciences, conceived as something apart from philosophy, and others to metaphysics, conceived as something apart from science, for certain kinds of answers. This book contends that these sorts of deference are misconceived. A compelling account of ontology must appreciate the ways in which the sciences incorporate metaphysical assumptions and arguments. At the same time, it must pay careful attention to how observation, experience, and the empirical dimensions of science are related to what may be viewed as defensible philosophical theorizing about ontology. The promise of an effectively naturalized metaphysics is to encourage beliefs that are formed in ways that do justice to scientific theorizing, modeling, and experimentation. But even armed with such a view, there is no one, uniquely rational way to draw lines between domains of ontology that are suitable for belief and ones in which it would be better to suspend belief instead. In crucial respects, ontology is in the eye of the beholder: it is informed by underlying commitments with implications for the limits of inquiry, which inevitably vary across rational inquirers. As result, the proper scope of ontology is subject to a striking form of voluntary choice, yielding a new and transformative conception of scientific ontology.

KW - Deflationism

KW - Empiricism

KW - Epistemic stances

KW - Explanatory power

KW - Metaphysical inference

KW - Naturalized metaphysics

KW - Pragmatism

KW - Realism

KW - Scientific ontology

KW - Voluntarism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060597024&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060597024&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/oso/9780190651459.001.0001

DO - 10.1093/oso/9780190651459.001.0001

M3 - Book

AN - SCOPUS:85060597024

BT - Scientific ontology

PB - Oxford University Press

ER -