Schadenfreude

The (not so) Secret Joy of Another’s Misfortune

Marie Dasborough, Paul Harvey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite growing interest in emotions, organizational scholars have largely ignored the moral emotion of schadenfreude, which refers to pleasure felt in response to another’s misfortune. As a socially undesirable emotion, it might be assumed that individuals would be hesitant to share their schadenfreude. In two experimental studies involving emotional responses to unethical behaviors, we find evidence to the contrary. Study 1 revealed that subjects experiencing schadenfreude were willing to share their feelings, especially if the misfortune was perceived to be deserved (i.e., resulting from unethical behaviors). Study 2 extends this work by incorporating schadenfreude targets of different status (CEO versus employee). Consistent with the “tall poppy syndrome,” subjects were more willing to share schadenfreude concerning high status targets than low status targets when the perceived severity of the target’s misconduct was low. This status effect disappeared at higher levels of perceived deservingness, however. Reported willingness to share schadenfreude was strongest at these levels but did not differ significantly between high and low status targets. These findings build on the social functional account of emotions, suggesting that sharing schadenfreude may signal normative cues to others regarding workplace behaviors that are deemed to be unethical.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)693-707
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Business Ethics
Volume141
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2017

Fingerprint

emotion
workplace
employee
Misfortune
Emotion
evidence
Unethical behavior

Keywords

  • Affect
  • Moral emotion
  • Schadenfreude
  • Status
  • Tall poppy syndrome

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Law

Cite this

Schadenfreude : The (not so) Secret Joy of Another’s Misfortune. / Dasborough, Marie; Harvey, Paul.

In: Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 141, No. 4, 01.04.2017, p. 693-707.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5506b958b3f64714a3266011a2309ab7,
title = "Schadenfreude: The (not so) Secret Joy of Another’s Misfortune",
abstract = "Despite growing interest in emotions, organizational scholars have largely ignored the moral emotion of schadenfreude, which refers to pleasure felt in response to another’s misfortune. As a socially undesirable emotion, it might be assumed that individuals would be hesitant to share their schadenfreude. In two experimental studies involving emotional responses to unethical behaviors, we find evidence to the contrary. Study 1 revealed that subjects experiencing schadenfreude were willing to share their feelings, especially if the misfortune was perceived to be deserved (i.e., resulting from unethical behaviors). Study 2 extends this work by incorporating schadenfreude targets of different status (CEO versus employee). Consistent with the “tall poppy syndrome,” subjects were more willing to share schadenfreude concerning high status targets than low status targets when the perceived severity of the target’s misconduct was low. This status effect disappeared at higher levels of perceived deservingness, however. Reported willingness to share schadenfreude was strongest at these levels but did not differ significantly between high and low status targets. These findings build on the social functional account of emotions, suggesting that sharing schadenfreude may signal normative cues to others regarding workplace behaviors that are deemed to be unethical.",
keywords = "Affect, Moral emotion, Schadenfreude, Status, Tall poppy syndrome",
author = "Marie Dasborough and Paul Harvey",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10551-016-3060-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "141",
pages = "693--707",
journal = "Journal of Business Ethics",
issn = "0167-4544",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Schadenfreude

T2 - The (not so) Secret Joy of Another’s Misfortune

AU - Dasborough, Marie

AU - Harvey, Paul

PY - 2017/4/1

Y1 - 2017/4/1

N2 - Despite growing interest in emotions, organizational scholars have largely ignored the moral emotion of schadenfreude, which refers to pleasure felt in response to another’s misfortune. As a socially undesirable emotion, it might be assumed that individuals would be hesitant to share their schadenfreude. In two experimental studies involving emotional responses to unethical behaviors, we find evidence to the contrary. Study 1 revealed that subjects experiencing schadenfreude were willing to share their feelings, especially if the misfortune was perceived to be deserved (i.e., resulting from unethical behaviors). Study 2 extends this work by incorporating schadenfreude targets of different status (CEO versus employee). Consistent with the “tall poppy syndrome,” subjects were more willing to share schadenfreude concerning high status targets than low status targets when the perceived severity of the target’s misconduct was low. This status effect disappeared at higher levels of perceived deservingness, however. Reported willingness to share schadenfreude was strongest at these levels but did not differ significantly between high and low status targets. These findings build on the social functional account of emotions, suggesting that sharing schadenfreude may signal normative cues to others regarding workplace behaviors that are deemed to be unethical.

AB - Despite growing interest in emotions, organizational scholars have largely ignored the moral emotion of schadenfreude, which refers to pleasure felt in response to another’s misfortune. As a socially undesirable emotion, it might be assumed that individuals would be hesitant to share their schadenfreude. In two experimental studies involving emotional responses to unethical behaviors, we find evidence to the contrary. Study 1 revealed that subjects experiencing schadenfreude were willing to share their feelings, especially if the misfortune was perceived to be deserved (i.e., resulting from unethical behaviors). Study 2 extends this work by incorporating schadenfreude targets of different status (CEO versus employee). Consistent with the “tall poppy syndrome,” subjects were more willing to share schadenfreude concerning high status targets than low status targets when the perceived severity of the target’s misconduct was low. This status effect disappeared at higher levels of perceived deservingness, however. Reported willingness to share schadenfreude was strongest at these levels but did not differ significantly between high and low status targets. These findings build on the social functional account of emotions, suggesting that sharing schadenfreude may signal normative cues to others regarding workplace behaviors that are deemed to be unethical.

KW - Affect

KW - Moral emotion

KW - Schadenfreude

KW - Status

KW - Tall poppy syndrome

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016312624&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85016312624&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10551-016-3060-7

DO - 10.1007/s10551-016-3060-7

M3 - Article

VL - 141

SP - 693

EP - 707

JO - Journal of Business Ethics

JF - Journal of Business Ethics

SN - 0167-4544

IS - 4

ER -