Sacred texts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It seems indisputable that the way we define and classify texts influences the way we read texts. My concern is to develop methods for reading and understanding texts that are influenced by distinctions between the secular and the sacred, and then draw out some preliminary implications of these methods and distinctions for relationships between church and state in liberal democracies. Distinctions between sacred and secular texts can be tracked with the conjecture that a full textual reading of a sacred text requires a kind of interior commitment. I develop the conjecture, and then argue that this requirement increases the distance between scepticism and religious belief. The upshot of such distinctions and implications is that we cannot read sacred texts as sacred while maintaining the secular consciousness that defines liberal democracies. Acknowledging these textual differences between religion and politics lays to rest, permanently, the popular creed of exceptionalism, the belief that secular patterns of thought, grounded in compromise and toleration, can scan and comprehend religious beliefs from some impartial perspective.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-21
Number of pages21
JournalReligion
Volume33
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

democracy
compromise
consciousness
Sacred Text
church
Religion
commitment
politics
Liberal Democracy
Religious Beliefs
Creed
Compromise
Exceptionalism
Toleration
Skepticism
Thought
Consciousness

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • History
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Sacred texts. / Frohock, Fred.

In: Religion, Vol. 33, No. 1, 01.2003, p. 1-21.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Frohock, Fred. / Sacred texts. In: Religion. 2003 ; Vol. 33, No. 1. pp. 1-21.
@article{8573fb7629744922b5fb2181b7cb97b5,
title = "Sacred texts",
abstract = "It seems indisputable that the way we define and classify texts influences the way we read texts. My concern is to develop methods for reading and understanding texts that are influenced by distinctions between the secular and the sacred, and then draw out some preliminary implications of these methods and distinctions for relationships between church and state in liberal democracies. Distinctions between sacred and secular texts can be tracked with the conjecture that a full textual reading of a sacred text requires a kind of interior commitment. I develop the conjecture, and then argue that this requirement increases the distance between scepticism and religious belief. The upshot of such distinctions and implications is that we cannot read sacred texts as sacred while maintaining the secular consciousness that defines liberal democracies. Acknowledging these textual differences between religion and politics lays to rest, permanently, the popular creed of exceptionalism, the belief that secular patterns of thought, grounded in compromise and toleration, can scan and comprehend religious beliefs from some impartial perspective.",
author = "Fred Frohock",
year = "2003",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0048-721X(02)00061-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "1--21",
journal = "Religion",
issn = "0048-721X",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sacred texts

AU - Frohock, Fred

PY - 2003/1

Y1 - 2003/1

N2 - It seems indisputable that the way we define and classify texts influences the way we read texts. My concern is to develop methods for reading and understanding texts that are influenced by distinctions between the secular and the sacred, and then draw out some preliminary implications of these methods and distinctions for relationships between church and state in liberal democracies. Distinctions between sacred and secular texts can be tracked with the conjecture that a full textual reading of a sacred text requires a kind of interior commitment. I develop the conjecture, and then argue that this requirement increases the distance between scepticism and religious belief. The upshot of such distinctions and implications is that we cannot read sacred texts as sacred while maintaining the secular consciousness that defines liberal democracies. Acknowledging these textual differences between religion and politics lays to rest, permanently, the popular creed of exceptionalism, the belief that secular patterns of thought, grounded in compromise and toleration, can scan and comprehend religious beliefs from some impartial perspective.

AB - It seems indisputable that the way we define and classify texts influences the way we read texts. My concern is to develop methods for reading and understanding texts that are influenced by distinctions between the secular and the sacred, and then draw out some preliminary implications of these methods and distinctions for relationships between church and state in liberal democracies. Distinctions between sacred and secular texts can be tracked with the conjecture that a full textual reading of a sacred text requires a kind of interior commitment. I develop the conjecture, and then argue that this requirement increases the distance between scepticism and religious belief. The upshot of such distinctions and implications is that we cannot read sacred texts as sacred while maintaining the secular consciousness that defines liberal democracies. Acknowledging these textual differences between religion and politics lays to rest, permanently, the popular creed of exceptionalism, the belief that secular patterns of thought, grounded in compromise and toleration, can scan and comprehend religious beliefs from some impartial perspective.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0038036396&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0038036396&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0048-721X(02)00061-1

DO - 10.1016/S0048-721X(02)00061-1

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0038036396

VL - 33

SP - 1

EP - 21

JO - Religion

JF - Religion

SN - 0048-721X

IS - 1

ER -