Role of appendectomy at the time of primary surgery in patients with early-stage ovarian cancer

Pedro T. Ramirez, Brian Slomovitz, Lacey McQuinn, Charles Levenback, Robert L. Coleman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective.: To determine whether appendectomy is warranted in patients with apparent early-stage ovarian cancer who undergo surgery for staging and cytoreduction and to determine the complication rate associated with appendectomy in such patients. Methods.: We reviewed the medical records of all patients who underwent appendectomy at the time of primary surgery for ovarian cancer at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center between January 1992 and December 2004 and who did not meet any of the following exclusion criteria: stage III or IV ovarian cancer, appendectomy as part of a second-look procedure or secondary tumor-reductive surgery, primary appendiceal cancer, primary gastrointestinal malignancy with metastasis to the appendix, incomplete clinicopathologic data, appendicitis as a preoperative diagnosis, primary fallopian tube cancer, primary peritoneal cancer, or documented dual primary tumors. Results.: Fifty-seven patients were included in this analysis. The median age was 47 years (range, 13-75). Median follow-up was 53 months (range, 3-147). Histologic diagnoses were as follows: invasive epithelial carcinoma, 35 patients (61%); tumor of low malignant potential, 15 patients (26%); malignant germ cell tumor, 4 patients (7%); and other, 3 patients (5%). Twenty-three patients (40%) had pure mucinous tumors. Forty-six patients (81%) had stage I and 11 patients (19%) had stage II disease. The median CA-125 level was 36.2 U/mL (range, 7-7900). No patient had evidence of appendiceal involvement. No patient suffered an intraoperative or postoperative complication directly related to appendectomy. Conclusions.: Appendectomy at the time of surgery for apparent early-stage ovarian cancer is not associated with complications but should not be routinely recommended.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)888-890
Number of pages3
JournalGynecologic Oncology
Volume103
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Appendectomy
Ovarian Neoplasms
Neoplasms
Appendiceal Neoplasms
Fallopian Tube Neoplasms
Germ Cell and Embryonal Neoplasms
Intraoperative Complications
Appendicitis
Medical Records

Keywords

  • Appendectomy
  • Ovarian cancer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Oncology

Cite this

Role of appendectomy at the time of primary surgery in patients with early-stage ovarian cancer. / Ramirez, Pedro T.; Slomovitz, Brian; McQuinn, Lacey; Levenback, Charles; Coleman, Robert L.

In: Gynecologic Oncology, Vol. 103, No. 3, 12.2006, p. 888-890.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ramirez, Pedro T. ; Slomovitz, Brian ; McQuinn, Lacey ; Levenback, Charles ; Coleman, Robert L. / Role of appendectomy at the time of primary surgery in patients with early-stage ovarian cancer. In: Gynecologic Oncology. 2006 ; Vol. 103, No. 3. pp. 888-890.
@article{57b08d2001884ffda44b8e56b1d862f6,
title = "Role of appendectomy at the time of primary surgery in patients with early-stage ovarian cancer",
abstract = "Objective.: To determine whether appendectomy is warranted in patients with apparent early-stage ovarian cancer who undergo surgery for staging and cytoreduction and to determine the complication rate associated with appendectomy in such patients. Methods.: We reviewed the medical records of all patients who underwent appendectomy at the time of primary surgery for ovarian cancer at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center between January 1992 and December 2004 and who did not meet any of the following exclusion criteria: stage III or IV ovarian cancer, appendectomy as part of a second-look procedure or secondary tumor-reductive surgery, primary appendiceal cancer, primary gastrointestinal malignancy with metastasis to the appendix, incomplete clinicopathologic data, appendicitis as a preoperative diagnosis, primary fallopian tube cancer, primary peritoneal cancer, or documented dual primary tumors. Results.: Fifty-seven patients were included in this analysis. The median age was 47 years (range, 13-75). Median follow-up was 53 months (range, 3-147). Histologic diagnoses were as follows: invasive epithelial carcinoma, 35 patients (61{\%}); tumor of low malignant potential, 15 patients (26{\%}); malignant germ cell tumor, 4 patients (7{\%}); and other, 3 patients (5{\%}). Twenty-three patients (40{\%}) had pure mucinous tumors. Forty-six patients (81{\%}) had stage I and 11 patients (19{\%}) had stage II disease. The median CA-125 level was 36.2 U/mL (range, 7-7900). No patient had evidence of appendiceal involvement. No patient suffered an intraoperative or postoperative complication directly related to appendectomy. Conclusions.: Appendectomy at the time of surgery for apparent early-stage ovarian cancer is not associated with complications but should not be routinely recommended.",
keywords = "Appendectomy, Ovarian cancer",
author = "Ramirez, {Pedro T.} and Brian Slomovitz and Lacey McQuinn and Charles Levenback and Coleman, {Robert L.}",
year = "2006",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.05.021",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "103",
pages = "888--890",
journal = "Gynecologic Oncology",
issn = "0090-8258",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Role of appendectomy at the time of primary surgery in patients with early-stage ovarian cancer

AU - Ramirez, Pedro T.

AU - Slomovitz, Brian

AU - McQuinn, Lacey

AU - Levenback, Charles

AU - Coleman, Robert L.

PY - 2006/12

Y1 - 2006/12

N2 - Objective.: To determine whether appendectomy is warranted in patients with apparent early-stage ovarian cancer who undergo surgery for staging and cytoreduction and to determine the complication rate associated with appendectomy in such patients. Methods.: We reviewed the medical records of all patients who underwent appendectomy at the time of primary surgery for ovarian cancer at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center between January 1992 and December 2004 and who did not meet any of the following exclusion criteria: stage III or IV ovarian cancer, appendectomy as part of a second-look procedure or secondary tumor-reductive surgery, primary appendiceal cancer, primary gastrointestinal malignancy with metastasis to the appendix, incomplete clinicopathologic data, appendicitis as a preoperative diagnosis, primary fallopian tube cancer, primary peritoneal cancer, or documented dual primary tumors. Results.: Fifty-seven patients were included in this analysis. The median age was 47 years (range, 13-75). Median follow-up was 53 months (range, 3-147). Histologic diagnoses were as follows: invasive epithelial carcinoma, 35 patients (61%); tumor of low malignant potential, 15 patients (26%); malignant germ cell tumor, 4 patients (7%); and other, 3 patients (5%). Twenty-three patients (40%) had pure mucinous tumors. Forty-six patients (81%) had stage I and 11 patients (19%) had stage II disease. The median CA-125 level was 36.2 U/mL (range, 7-7900). No patient had evidence of appendiceal involvement. No patient suffered an intraoperative or postoperative complication directly related to appendectomy. Conclusions.: Appendectomy at the time of surgery for apparent early-stage ovarian cancer is not associated with complications but should not be routinely recommended.

AB - Objective.: To determine whether appendectomy is warranted in patients with apparent early-stage ovarian cancer who undergo surgery for staging and cytoreduction and to determine the complication rate associated with appendectomy in such patients. Methods.: We reviewed the medical records of all patients who underwent appendectomy at the time of primary surgery for ovarian cancer at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center between January 1992 and December 2004 and who did not meet any of the following exclusion criteria: stage III or IV ovarian cancer, appendectomy as part of a second-look procedure or secondary tumor-reductive surgery, primary appendiceal cancer, primary gastrointestinal malignancy with metastasis to the appendix, incomplete clinicopathologic data, appendicitis as a preoperative diagnosis, primary fallopian tube cancer, primary peritoneal cancer, or documented dual primary tumors. Results.: Fifty-seven patients were included in this analysis. The median age was 47 years (range, 13-75). Median follow-up was 53 months (range, 3-147). Histologic diagnoses were as follows: invasive epithelial carcinoma, 35 patients (61%); tumor of low malignant potential, 15 patients (26%); malignant germ cell tumor, 4 patients (7%); and other, 3 patients (5%). Twenty-three patients (40%) had pure mucinous tumors. Forty-six patients (81%) had stage I and 11 patients (19%) had stage II disease. The median CA-125 level was 36.2 U/mL (range, 7-7900). No patient had evidence of appendiceal involvement. No patient suffered an intraoperative or postoperative complication directly related to appendectomy. Conclusions.: Appendectomy at the time of surgery for apparent early-stage ovarian cancer is not associated with complications but should not be routinely recommended.

KW - Appendectomy

KW - Ovarian cancer

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33751513296&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33751513296&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.05.021

DO - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.05.021

M3 - Article

VL - 103

SP - 888

EP - 890

JO - Gynecologic Oncology

JF - Gynecologic Oncology

SN - 0090-8258

IS - 3

ER -