Role Congruity Theory: Perceptions of Fairness and Sexism in Sport Management

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study applied three dimensions of organizational justice - distributive justice, procedural justice, and interpersonal justice – to high school athletics to determine if the fairness perceptions held by head coaches towards their athletic director differed based upon the sex of the athletic director or sex of the coach, after controlling for the level of ambivalent sexism of the coach. If fairness perceptions did differ significantly, the findings would support the notion that attitudes towards women in leadership roles were less positive than attitudes towards men even after controlling for sexist attitudes, thus supporting role congruity theory of prejudice toward women in leadership roles. The results indicated the fairness perceptions held by the coaches differed depending upon the sex of the coach and sex of the athletic director. After controlling for the coaches’ sexist attitudes, male coaches’ perceptions of distributive justice of female athletic directors was significantly lower than female coaches’ perceptions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)475-485
Number of pages11
JournalPublic Organization Review
Volume15
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2015

Fingerprint

congruity theory
role theory
sexism
coach
fairness
Sports
management
director
distributive justice
justice
leadership
Sport management
Fairness
Sexism
Coach
prejudice
Athletics

Keywords

  • Fairness
  • Role congruity theory
  • Sexism
  • Sport management

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
  • Law

Cite this

Role Congruity Theory : Perceptions of Fairness and Sexism in Sport Management. / Whisenant, Warren; Lee, Debbiesiu; Dees, Windy.

In: Public Organization Review, Vol. 15, No. 4, 01.12.2015, p. 475-485.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{89957575ad4d4e81bd9e23ac5b8666e2,
title = "Role Congruity Theory: Perceptions of Fairness and Sexism in Sport Management",
abstract = "This study applied three dimensions of organizational justice - distributive justice, procedural justice, and interpersonal justice – to high school athletics to determine if the fairness perceptions held by head coaches towards their athletic director differed based upon the sex of the athletic director or sex of the coach, after controlling for the level of ambivalent sexism of the coach. If fairness perceptions did differ significantly, the findings would support the notion that attitudes towards women in leadership roles were less positive than attitudes towards men even after controlling for sexist attitudes, thus supporting role congruity theory of prejudice toward women in leadership roles. The results indicated the fairness perceptions held by the coaches differed depending upon the sex of the coach and sex of the athletic director. After controlling for the coaches’ sexist attitudes, male coaches’ perceptions of distributive justice of female athletic directors was significantly lower than female coaches’ perceptions.",
keywords = "Fairness, Role congruity theory, Sexism, Sport management",
author = "Warren Whisenant and Debbiesiu Lee and Windy Dees",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11115-014-0281-z",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "475--485",
journal = "Public Organization Review",
issn = "1566-7170",
publisher = "Kluwer Academic Publishers",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Role Congruity Theory

T2 - Perceptions of Fairness and Sexism in Sport Management

AU - Whisenant, Warren

AU - Lee, Debbiesiu

AU - Dees, Windy

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - This study applied three dimensions of organizational justice - distributive justice, procedural justice, and interpersonal justice – to high school athletics to determine if the fairness perceptions held by head coaches towards their athletic director differed based upon the sex of the athletic director or sex of the coach, after controlling for the level of ambivalent sexism of the coach. If fairness perceptions did differ significantly, the findings would support the notion that attitudes towards women in leadership roles were less positive than attitudes towards men even after controlling for sexist attitudes, thus supporting role congruity theory of prejudice toward women in leadership roles. The results indicated the fairness perceptions held by the coaches differed depending upon the sex of the coach and sex of the athletic director. After controlling for the coaches’ sexist attitudes, male coaches’ perceptions of distributive justice of female athletic directors was significantly lower than female coaches’ perceptions.

AB - This study applied three dimensions of organizational justice - distributive justice, procedural justice, and interpersonal justice – to high school athletics to determine if the fairness perceptions held by head coaches towards their athletic director differed based upon the sex of the athletic director or sex of the coach, after controlling for the level of ambivalent sexism of the coach. If fairness perceptions did differ significantly, the findings would support the notion that attitudes towards women in leadership roles were less positive than attitudes towards men even after controlling for sexist attitudes, thus supporting role congruity theory of prejudice toward women in leadership roles. The results indicated the fairness perceptions held by the coaches differed depending upon the sex of the coach and sex of the athletic director. After controlling for the coaches’ sexist attitudes, male coaches’ perceptions of distributive justice of female athletic directors was significantly lower than female coaches’ perceptions.

KW - Fairness

KW - Role congruity theory

KW - Sexism

KW - Sport management

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947125888&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84947125888&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11115-014-0281-z

DO - 10.1007/s11115-014-0281-z

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84947125888

VL - 15

SP - 475

EP - 485

JO - Public Organization Review

JF - Public Organization Review

SN - 1566-7170

IS - 4

ER -