Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for colonic disease: a meta-analysis of postoperative variables

Alberto Zarak, Alvaro Castillo, Kandace Kichler, Lucy de la Cruz, Leonardo Tamariz, Srinivas Kaza

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: An increasing number of studies have been published since the introduction of robotic technology into general surgery. Gastrointestinal surgery is an area of special interest for the robotic surgeon. Colonic surgery can be challenging depending on the disease and the operative approach. We seek to perform a meta-analysis comparing robotic surgery against laparoscopic surgery in this particular field. Materials and methods: We performed a systematic search of MEDLINE database from January 2001 to July 2013 supplemented by manual searches of bibliographies of key relevant articles. Randomized controlled trials and cohort studies were selected for review and for collection of postoperative data (length of stay, time to first flatus and complications). Results: After careful review, nine studies were considered for analysis. Non-pooled data showed a slight trend toward laparoscopy with increased number of events without statistical significance. Pooled data demonstrated a statistical significance for return to bowel function in the right and mixed robotic colectomy arm (WSMD −0.33, 95 % CI −0.5, −0.1; p < 0.005 and WSMD −0.26, 95 % CI −0.51, 0.0; p = 0.05). Pooled data of length of stay and complications showed no statistical significance between robotic and laparoscopic colonic surgery. Discussion: Robotic surgery is a comparable option when dealing with colonic disease, either benign or malignant. No difference in complication rate or length of stay was found when comparing the two. Robotic surgery appears to have an advantage over laparoscopy in regards to return of bowel function when dealing with right colectomies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1341-1347
Number of pages7
JournalSurgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques
Volume29
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2015

Fingerprint

Colonic Diseases
Robotics
Laparoscopy
Meta-Analysis
Length of Stay
Colectomy
Flatulence
Bibliography
MEDLINE
Cohort Studies
Randomized Controlled Trials
Databases
Technology

Keywords

  • Colon
  • Colonic
  • Laparoscopic
  • Robot
  • Robotic

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for colonic disease : a meta-analysis of postoperative variables. / Zarak, Alberto; Castillo, Alvaro; Kichler, Kandace; de la Cruz, Lucy; Tamariz, Leonardo; Kaza, Srinivas.

In: Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, Vol. 29, No. 6, 01.06.2015, p. 1341-1347.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Zarak, Alberto ; Castillo, Alvaro ; Kichler, Kandace ; de la Cruz, Lucy ; Tamariz, Leonardo ; Kaza, Srinivas. / Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for colonic disease : a meta-analysis of postoperative variables. In: Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques. 2015 ; Vol. 29, No. 6. pp. 1341-1347.
@article{9a6b84b910424e55b31feb3cedbe605a,
title = "Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for colonic disease: a meta-analysis of postoperative variables",
abstract = "Introduction: An increasing number of studies have been published since the introduction of robotic technology into general surgery. Gastrointestinal surgery is an area of special interest for the robotic surgeon. Colonic surgery can be challenging depending on the disease and the operative approach. We seek to perform a meta-analysis comparing robotic surgery against laparoscopic surgery in this particular field. Materials and methods: We performed a systematic search of MEDLINE database from January 2001 to July 2013 supplemented by manual searches of bibliographies of key relevant articles. Randomized controlled trials and cohort studies were selected for review and for collection of postoperative data (length of stay, time to first flatus and complications). Results: After careful review, nine studies were considered for analysis. Non-pooled data showed a slight trend toward laparoscopy with increased number of events without statistical significance. Pooled data demonstrated a statistical significance for return to bowel function in the right and mixed robotic colectomy arm (WSMD −0.33, 95 {\%} CI −0.5, −0.1; p < 0.005 and WSMD −0.26, 95 {\%} CI −0.51, 0.0; p = 0.05). Pooled data of length of stay and complications showed no statistical significance between robotic and laparoscopic colonic surgery. Discussion: Robotic surgery is a comparable option when dealing with colonic disease, either benign or malignant. No difference in complication rate or length of stay was found when comparing the two. Robotic surgery appears to have an advantage over laparoscopy in regards to return of bowel function when dealing with right colectomies.",
keywords = "Colon, Colonic, Laparoscopic, Robot, Robotic",
author = "Alberto Zarak and Alvaro Castillo and Kandace Kichler and {de la Cruz}, Lucy and Leonardo Tamariz and Srinivas Kaza",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00464-015-4197-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "1341--1347",
journal = "Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques",
issn = "0930-2794",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for colonic disease

T2 - a meta-analysis of postoperative variables

AU - Zarak, Alberto

AU - Castillo, Alvaro

AU - Kichler, Kandace

AU - de la Cruz, Lucy

AU - Tamariz, Leonardo

AU - Kaza, Srinivas

PY - 2015/6/1

Y1 - 2015/6/1

N2 - Introduction: An increasing number of studies have been published since the introduction of robotic technology into general surgery. Gastrointestinal surgery is an area of special interest for the robotic surgeon. Colonic surgery can be challenging depending on the disease and the operative approach. We seek to perform a meta-analysis comparing robotic surgery against laparoscopic surgery in this particular field. Materials and methods: We performed a systematic search of MEDLINE database from January 2001 to July 2013 supplemented by manual searches of bibliographies of key relevant articles. Randomized controlled trials and cohort studies were selected for review and for collection of postoperative data (length of stay, time to first flatus and complications). Results: After careful review, nine studies were considered for analysis. Non-pooled data showed a slight trend toward laparoscopy with increased number of events without statistical significance. Pooled data demonstrated a statistical significance for return to bowel function in the right and mixed robotic colectomy arm (WSMD −0.33, 95 % CI −0.5, −0.1; p < 0.005 and WSMD −0.26, 95 % CI −0.51, 0.0; p = 0.05). Pooled data of length of stay and complications showed no statistical significance between robotic and laparoscopic colonic surgery. Discussion: Robotic surgery is a comparable option when dealing with colonic disease, either benign or malignant. No difference in complication rate or length of stay was found when comparing the two. Robotic surgery appears to have an advantage over laparoscopy in regards to return of bowel function when dealing with right colectomies.

AB - Introduction: An increasing number of studies have been published since the introduction of robotic technology into general surgery. Gastrointestinal surgery is an area of special interest for the robotic surgeon. Colonic surgery can be challenging depending on the disease and the operative approach. We seek to perform a meta-analysis comparing robotic surgery against laparoscopic surgery in this particular field. Materials and methods: We performed a systematic search of MEDLINE database from January 2001 to July 2013 supplemented by manual searches of bibliographies of key relevant articles. Randomized controlled trials and cohort studies were selected for review and for collection of postoperative data (length of stay, time to first flatus and complications). Results: After careful review, nine studies were considered for analysis. Non-pooled data showed a slight trend toward laparoscopy with increased number of events without statistical significance. Pooled data demonstrated a statistical significance for return to bowel function in the right and mixed robotic colectomy arm (WSMD −0.33, 95 % CI −0.5, −0.1; p < 0.005 and WSMD −0.26, 95 % CI −0.51, 0.0; p = 0.05). Pooled data of length of stay and complications showed no statistical significance between robotic and laparoscopic colonic surgery. Discussion: Robotic surgery is a comparable option when dealing with colonic disease, either benign or malignant. No difference in complication rate or length of stay was found when comparing the two. Robotic surgery appears to have an advantage over laparoscopy in regards to return of bowel function when dealing with right colectomies.

KW - Colon

KW - Colonic

KW - Laparoscopic

KW - Robot

KW - Robotic

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937758059&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937758059&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00464-015-4197-7

DO - 10.1007/s00464-015-4197-7

M3 - Article

C2 - 25847139

AN - SCOPUS:84937758059

VL - 29

SP - 1341

EP - 1347

JO - Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

JF - Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

SN - 0930-2794

IS - 6

ER -