Risk perceptions and conservation ethics among recreational anglers targeting threatened sharks in the subtropical Atlantic

Austin J. Gallagher, Steven J. Cooke, Neil Hammerschlag

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recreational fisheries management has traditionally been more concerned with quantifiable, catch-centric goals than angler-centric perceptions. However, the attitudes of fishers affect their behavior, which can alter the effort they make towards conservation actions, and ultimately, the outcome for exploited or threatened species. We conducted a quantitative human dimensions study into the drivers of conservation attitudes and perceptions of recreational fishers towards sharks. This was accomplished through a targeted online snowball survey on a sample of 158 recreational anglers in the state of Florida, a global hotspot for recreational fishing. Subjective knowledge of shark conservation issues was the most consistent driver for pro-shark conservation attitudes. Anglers ranked the great hammerhead and tiger shark as being the most threatened species, a result that is generally consistent with empirical data. Anglers did not identify speciesspecific differences in capture stress as an important factor in determining survivability, a result that somewhat contradicts available empirical data. In general, fishers were more supportive of management actions that would be the least restrictive to fishing, except in the case of highly threatened species. Anglers believed commercial fishing had the largest impact on shark populations, and recreational fishing the least, which is largely consistent with empirical information but could also reflect angler bias. Taken together, our findings suggest anglers generally care about shark conservation, but are unaware of some potential angling threats to sharks and possible conservation solutions. Further, anglers who consider themselves knowledgeable about shark conservation will be more sympathetic to shark management and more likely to adopt fishing practices that reduce shark mortality and sub-lethal impacts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)81-93
Number of pages13
JournalEndangered Species Research
Volume29
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016

Fingerprint

risk perception
shark
ethics
targeting
fishing
angling
fishery management
mortality

Keywords

  • Angler
  • Conservation
  • Fishing
  • Risk
  • Shark
  • Vulnerability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Ecology

Cite this

Risk perceptions and conservation ethics among recreational anglers targeting threatened sharks in the subtropical Atlantic. / Gallagher, Austin J.; Cooke, Steven J.; Hammerschlag, Neil.

In: Endangered Species Research, Vol. 29, No. 1, 2016, p. 81-93.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1fd54a4140884d82a18c6a618b998878,
title = "Risk perceptions and conservation ethics among recreational anglers targeting threatened sharks in the subtropical Atlantic",
abstract = "Recreational fisheries management has traditionally been more concerned with quantifiable, catch-centric goals than angler-centric perceptions. However, the attitudes of fishers affect their behavior, which can alter the effort they make towards conservation actions, and ultimately, the outcome for exploited or threatened species. We conducted a quantitative human dimensions study into the drivers of conservation attitudes and perceptions of recreational fishers towards sharks. This was accomplished through a targeted online snowball survey on a sample of 158 recreational anglers in the state of Florida, a global hotspot for recreational fishing. Subjective knowledge of shark conservation issues was the most consistent driver for pro-shark conservation attitudes. Anglers ranked the great hammerhead and tiger shark as being the most threatened species, a result that is generally consistent with empirical data. Anglers did not identify speciesspecific differences in capture stress as an important factor in determining survivability, a result that somewhat contradicts available empirical data. In general, fishers were more supportive of management actions that would be the least restrictive to fishing, except in the case of highly threatened species. Anglers believed commercial fishing had the largest impact on shark populations, and recreational fishing the least, which is largely consistent with empirical information but could also reflect angler bias. Taken together, our findings suggest anglers generally care about shark conservation, but are unaware of some potential angling threats to sharks and possible conservation solutions. Further, anglers who consider themselves knowledgeable about shark conservation will be more sympathetic to shark management and more likely to adopt fishing practices that reduce shark mortality and sub-lethal impacts.",
keywords = "Angler, Conservation, Fishing, Risk, Shark, Vulnerability",
author = "Gallagher, {Austin J.} and Cooke, {Steven J.} and Neil Hammerschlag",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.3354/esr00704",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "81--93",
journal = "Endangered Species Research",
issn = "1863-5407",
publisher = "Inter-Research",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Risk perceptions and conservation ethics among recreational anglers targeting threatened sharks in the subtropical Atlantic

AU - Gallagher, Austin J.

AU - Cooke, Steven J.

AU - Hammerschlag, Neil

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Recreational fisheries management has traditionally been more concerned with quantifiable, catch-centric goals than angler-centric perceptions. However, the attitudes of fishers affect their behavior, which can alter the effort they make towards conservation actions, and ultimately, the outcome for exploited or threatened species. We conducted a quantitative human dimensions study into the drivers of conservation attitudes and perceptions of recreational fishers towards sharks. This was accomplished through a targeted online snowball survey on a sample of 158 recreational anglers in the state of Florida, a global hotspot for recreational fishing. Subjective knowledge of shark conservation issues was the most consistent driver for pro-shark conservation attitudes. Anglers ranked the great hammerhead and tiger shark as being the most threatened species, a result that is generally consistent with empirical data. Anglers did not identify speciesspecific differences in capture stress as an important factor in determining survivability, a result that somewhat contradicts available empirical data. In general, fishers were more supportive of management actions that would be the least restrictive to fishing, except in the case of highly threatened species. Anglers believed commercial fishing had the largest impact on shark populations, and recreational fishing the least, which is largely consistent with empirical information but could also reflect angler bias. Taken together, our findings suggest anglers generally care about shark conservation, but are unaware of some potential angling threats to sharks and possible conservation solutions. Further, anglers who consider themselves knowledgeable about shark conservation will be more sympathetic to shark management and more likely to adopt fishing practices that reduce shark mortality and sub-lethal impacts.

AB - Recreational fisheries management has traditionally been more concerned with quantifiable, catch-centric goals than angler-centric perceptions. However, the attitudes of fishers affect their behavior, which can alter the effort they make towards conservation actions, and ultimately, the outcome for exploited or threatened species. We conducted a quantitative human dimensions study into the drivers of conservation attitudes and perceptions of recreational fishers towards sharks. This was accomplished through a targeted online snowball survey on a sample of 158 recreational anglers in the state of Florida, a global hotspot for recreational fishing. Subjective knowledge of shark conservation issues was the most consistent driver for pro-shark conservation attitudes. Anglers ranked the great hammerhead and tiger shark as being the most threatened species, a result that is generally consistent with empirical data. Anglers did not identify speciesspecific differences in capture stress as an important factor in determining survivability, a result that somewhat contradicts available empirical data. In general, fishers were more supportive of management actions that would be the least restrictive to fishing, except in the case of highly threatened species. Anglers believed commercial fishing had the largest impact on shark populations, and recreational fishing the least, which is largely consistent with empirical information but could also reflect angler bias. Taken together, our findings suggest anglers generally care about shark conservation, but are unaware of some potential angling threats to sharks and possible conservation solutions. Further, anglers who consider themselves knowledgeable about shark conservation will be more sympathetic to shark management and more likely to adopt fishing practices that reduce shark mortality and sub-lethal impacts.

KW - Angler

KW - Conservation

KW - Fishing

KW - Risk

KW - Shark

KW - Vulnerability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84954349327&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84954349327&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3354/esr00704

DO - 10.3354/esr00704

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 81

EP - 93

JO - Endangered Species Research

JF - Endangered Species Research

SN - 1863-5407

IS - 1

ER -