Risk factors for failure to extend labor epidural analgesia to epidural anesthesia for Cesarean section

S. Orbach-Zinger, L. Friedman, A. Avramovich, N. Ilgiaeva, R. Orvieto, J. Sulkes, L. A. Eidelman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To identify parturients at risk of inability to extend labor epidural analgesia in whom alternative methods of anesthesia should be considered for Cesarean section (CS). Methods: For 6 months, we prospectively studied women undergoing a CS with a functioning epidural catheter in place from the delivery ward. All parturients received the same epidural protocol: bolus of bupivacaine 0.1% and fentanyl, then bupivacaine 0.1% and fentanyl (2 μg/ml) 10-15 ml/h and an additional 5 ml of bupivacaine 0.125% top-ups according to patient request. Sixteen millilitres of lidocaine 2%, 1 ml of bicarbonate, and 100 μg of fentanyl were given for CS. Failed epidural analgesia was defined as the need to convert to general anesthesia. Results: Of the 101 parturients studied, 20 (19.8%) required conversion to general anesthesia. In univariate analysis, the likelihood of failed epidural anesthesia was inversely correlated with parturient's age (P = 0.014) and directly correlated with pre-pregnancy weight (P = 0.019), weight at the end of pregnancy (P = 0.003), body mass index (BMI) at the end of pregnancy (P = 0.0004), gestational week (P = 0.008), number of top-ups (P = 0.0004) and visual analog scale (VAS) 2 h before CS (P = 0.03). In multivariate analysis, the number of top-ups in the delivery ward was the best predictor of epidural anesthesia failure (odds ratio 4.39, P = 0.005). Conclusion: Younger, more obese parturients at a higher gestational week, requiring more top-ups during labor, having a higher VAS in the 2 h before CS are at risk of inability to extend labor epidural analgesia to epidural anesthesia for CS.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1014-1018
Number of pages5
JournalActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Volume50
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2006
Externally publishedYes

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Cesarean section
  • Epidural analgesia
  • Epidural anesthesia
  • General anesthesia
  • Labor

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Orbach-Zinger, S., Friedman, L., Avramovich, A., Ilgiaeva, N., Orvieto, R., Sulkes, J., & Eidelman, L. A. (2006). Risk factors for failure to extend labor epidural analgesia to epidural anesthesia for Cesarean section. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 50(8), 1014-1018. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01095.x