Revising axis V for DSM-IV: A review of measures of social functioning

Howard H. Goldman, Andrew E. Skodol, Tamara Lave

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

848 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Axis V, which uses the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale in the multiaxial system of DSM-III-R, is under review for DSM-IV. This article examines what is known about axis V and selectively reviews the literature on measures of social functioning to identify potential alternatives to the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale. Method: About 25 studies on the use, reliability, and validity of axis V in DSM-III and DSM-III-R are reviewed. In addition, nearly 30 measures of social functioning are reviewed and analyzed as potential substitutes for the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale. The analysis focuses on the strengths and weaknesses of each measure for assessing functioning on axis V. Results: Axis V measures are modestly reliable and valid but not widely used. The authors identify and discuss two particular limitations of the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale: 1) the combination of measures of symptoms and measures of social functioning on a single axis and 2) the exclusion of physical impairments from the rating of functioning. Conclusions: None of the measures of social functioning reviewed is clearly superior to the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale for use on axis V. A modified version of the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale, separating the measures of social and occupational functioning from the measures of symptoms and psychological functioning, is proposed for field testing, along with a new set of instructions permitting the rating of limitations due to both physical and mental impairments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1148-1156
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Psychiatry
Volume149
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1992
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Reproducibility of Results
Psychology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Revising axis V for DSM-IV : A review of measures of social functioning. / Goldman, Howard H.; Skodol, Andrew E.; Lave, Tamara.

In: American Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 149, No. 9, 01.01.1992, p. 1148-1156.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Goldman, Howard H. ; Skodol, Andrew E. ; Lave, Tamara. / Revising axis V for DSM-IV : A review of measures of social functioning. In: American Journal of Psychiatry. 1992 ; Vol. 149, No. 9. pp. 1148-1156.
@article{53959a4c119c475d906834abb429339d,
title = "Revising axis V for DSM-IV: A review of measures of social functioning",
abstract = "Objective: Axis V, which uses the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale in the multiaxial system of DSM-III-R, is under review for DSM-IV. This article examines what is known about axis V and selectively reviews the literature on measures of social functioning to identify potential alternatives to the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale. Method: About 25 studies on the use, reliability, and validity of axis V in DSM-III and DSM-III-R are reviewed. In addition, nearly 30 measures of social functioning are reviewed and analyzed as potential substitutes for the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale. The analysis focuses on the strengths and weaknesses of each measure for assessing functioning on axis V. Results: Axis V measures are modestly reliable and valid but not widely used. The authors identify and discuss two particular limitations of the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale: 1) the combination of measures of symptoms and measures of social functioning on a single axis and 2) the exclusion of physical impairments from the rating of functioning. Conclusions: None of the measures of social functioning reviewed is clearly superior to the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale for use on axis V. A modified version of the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale, separating the measures of social and occupational functioning from the measures of symptoms and psychological functioning, is proposed for field testing, along with a new set of instructions permitting the rating of limitations due to both physical and mental impairments.",
author = "Goldman, {Howard H.} and Skodol, {Andrew E.} and Tamara Lave",
year = "1992",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1176/ajp.149.9.1148",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "149",
pages = "1148--1156",
journal = "American Journal of Psychiatry",
issn = "0002-953X",
publisher = "American Psychiatric Association",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Revising axis V for DSM-IV

T2 - A review of measures of social functioning

AU - Goldman, Howard H.

AU - Skodol, Andrew E.

AU - Lave, Tamara

PY - 1992/1/1

Y1 - 1992/1/1

N2 - Objective: Axis V, which uses the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale in the multiaxial system of DSM-III-R, is under review for DSM-IV. This article examines what is known about axis V and selectively reviews the literature on measures of social functioning to identify potential alternatives to the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale. Method: About 25 studies on the use, reliability, and validity of axis V in DSM-III and DSM-III-R are reviewed. In addition, nearly 30 measures of social functioning are reviewed and analyzed as potential substitutes for the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale. The analysis focuses on the strengths and weaknesses of each measure for assessing functioning on axis V. Results: Axis V measures are modestly reliable and valid but not widely used. The authors identify and discuss two particular limitations of the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale: 1) the combination of measures of symptoms and measures of social functioning on a single axis and 2) the exclusion of physical impairments from the rating of functioning. Conclusions: None of the measures of social functioning reviewed is clearly superior to the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale for use on axis V. A modified version of the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale, separating the measures of social and occupational functioning from the measures of symptoms and psychological functioning, is proposed for field testing, along with a new set of instructions permitting the rating of limitations due to both physical and mental impairments.

AB - Objective: Axis V, which uses the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale in the multiaxial system of DSM-III-R, is under review for DSM-IV. This article examines what is known about axis V and selectively reviews the literature on measures of social functioning to identify potential alternatives to the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale. Method: About 25 studies on the use, reliability, and validity of axis V in DSM-III and DSM-III-R are reviewed. In addition, nearly 30 measures of social functioning are reviewed and analyzed as potential substitutes for the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale. The analysis focuses on the strengths and weaknesses of each measure for assessing functioning on axis V. Results: Axis V measures are modestly reliable and valid but not widely used. The authors identify and discuss two particular limitations of the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale: 1) the combination of measures of symptoms and measures of social functioning on a single axis and 2) the exclusion of physical impairments from the rating of functioning. Conclusions: None of the measures of social functioning reviewed is clearly superior to the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale for use on axis V. A modified version of the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale, separating the measures of social and occupational functioning from the measures of symptoms and psychological functioning, is proposed for field testing, along with a new set of instructions permitting the rating of limitations due to both physical and mental impairments.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026786902&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026786902&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1176/ajp.149.9.1148

DO - 10.1176/ajp.149.9.1148

M3 - Article

C2 - 1386964

AN - SCOPUS:0026786902

VL - 149

SP - 1148

EP - 1156

JO - American Journal of Psychiatry

JF - American Journal of Psychiatry

SN - 0002-953X

IS - 9

ER -