Review essay: Which way psychology? A discussion of barbara: Held's psychology's interpretative turn: The search for truth and agency in theoretical and philosophical psychology

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Some psychologists have recently tried to develop new approaches to psychology incompatible with both natural-science views of the discipline and basic tenets of postmodernism. In her new book on psychology's interpretative turn, Barbara Held refers to these thinkers as "middleground theorists" or MGTs. Most of the MGTs reject psychological laws, defend free choice and agency, stress the role of values in psychological inquiry, and argue for a hermeneutical methodology. Some reject scientific realism and embrace epistemological relativism. Both Held and I express doubts about some of these views.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)291-310
Number of pages20
JournalPhilosophy of the Social Sciences
Volume40
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2010

Fingerprint

psychology
relativism
postmodernism
natural sciences
realism
psychologist
Law
methodology
Values
Psychological
Psychology
Philosophical Psychology
Psychologists
Thinkers
Epistemological
Scientific Realism
Methodology
Free Choice
Natural Science
Theorists

Keywords

  • Free choice
  • Hermeneutics
  • Psychological laws

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

@article{00e51cb5034d49439acbbf78c702424f,
title = "Review essay: Which way psychology? A discussion of barbara: Held's psychology's interpretative turn: The search for truth and agency in theoretical and philosophical psychology",
abstract = "Some psychologists have recently tried to develop new approaches to psychology incompatible with both natural-science views of the discipline and basic tenets of postmodernism. In her new book on psychology's interpretative turn, Barbara Held refers to these thinkers as {"}middleground theorists{"} or MGTs. Most of the MGTs reject psychological laws, defend free choice and agency, stress the role of values in psychological inquiry, and argue for a hermeneutical methodology. Some reject scientific realism and embrace epistemological relativism. Both Held and I express doubts about some of these views.",
keywords = "Free choice, Hermeneutics, Psychological laws",
author = "Edward Erwin",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0048393109345669",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "291--310",
journal = "Philosophy of the Social Sciences",
issn = "0048-3931",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Review essay

T2 - Which way psychology? A discussion of barbara: Held's psychology's interpretative turn: The search for truth and agency in theoretical and philosophical psychology

AU - Erwin, Edward

PY - 2010/6/1

Y1 - 2010/6/1

N2 - Some psychologists have recently tried to develop new approaches to psychology incompatible with both natural-science views of the discipline and basic tenets of postmodernism. In her new book on psychology's interpretative turn, Barbara Held refers to these thinkers as "middleground theorists" or MGTs. Most of the MGTs reject psychological laws, defend free choice and agency, stress the role of values in psychological inquiry, and argue for a hermeneutical methodology. Some reject scientific realism and embrace epistemological relativism. Both Held and I express doubts about some of these views.

AB - Some psychologists have recently tried to develop new approaches to psychology incompatible with both natural-science views of the discipline and basic tenets of postmodernism. In her new book on psychology's interpretative turn, Barbara Held refers to these thinkers as "middleground theorists" or MGTs. Most of the MGTs reject psychological laws, defend free choice and agency, stress the role of values in psychological inquiry, and argue for a hermeneutical methodology. Some reject scientific realism and embrace epistemological relativism. Both Held and I express doubts about some of these views.

KW - Free choice

KW - Hermeneutics

KW - Psychological laws

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77952517158&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77952517158&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0048393109345669

DO - 10.1177/0048393109345669

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:77952517158

VL - 40

SP - 291

EP - 310

JO - Philosophy of the Social Sciences

JF - Philosophy of the Social Sciences

SN - 0048-3931

IS - 2

ER -