Rethinking the Life Cycle

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Carol Gilligan criticized Erik Erikson’s account of the human life cycle for its sexist assumptions, but never offered an alternative general account. This can be done, however, by drawing on recent ideas about balancing career and family. An adult identity is forged through a “choice” of how much to emphasize career (or individual self-fulfillment) and how much to emphasize family (or relationships) in one’s life. Erikson skimped on the relationship issues intrinsic to human development, but his work gives us the material we need for a fuller and non-sexist picture of development that treats males and females as facing the same basic developmental issues.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationSpringerBriefs in Philosophy
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media B.V.
Pages5-17
Number of pages13
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016

Publication series

NameSpringerBriefs in Philosophy
ISSN (Print)2211-4548
ISSN (Electronic)2211-4556

Keywords

  • Career
  • Development
  • Erikson
  • Family
  • Feminism
  • Freud
  • Gilligan
  • Identity
  • Life cycle
  • Sexism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Rethinking the Life Cycle'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this