Results of the 4th ABFO Bitemark Workshop - 1999

Kristopher Arheart, Iain A. Pretty

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Thirty-two certified diplomates of the American Board of Forensic odontology (ABFO) participated in a study of the accuracy of bitemark analysis. Examiner experience as board-certified odontologists ranged from 2 to 22 years.Examiners were given sets of photographs (a cast in 1 case) of 4 bitemark cases and asked to report their certainty that each case was truly a bitemark and the apparent value of the case as forensic evidence. Participants also received 7 occluding sets of dental casts, 1 correct dentition for each case and three unrelated to any of the cases, and asked to rate how certain they were that each set of teeth had made each bitemark. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis resulted in an accuracy score of 0.86 (95% CI=0.82-0.91). Youden's index was used to determine a cutoff point for determining an accuracy score for each case. Accuracy scores were significantly correlated with bitemark certainty and forensic value (P<0.001 in both cases) but not with examiner experience (P=0.958). The use of individual ROC analysis with weighted Youden's index to calibrate individual accuracy was also demonstrated.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)104-111
Number of pages8
JournalForensic Science International
Volume124
Issue number2-3
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 27 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

ROC Curve
Tooth
Education
Dentition

Keywords

  • Accuracy
  • Bitemark effectiveness
  • Diplomates
  • Forensic science
  • ROC
  • Validity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics
  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Results of the 4th ABFO Bitemark Workshop - 1999. / Arheart, Kristopher; Pretty, Iain A.

In: Forensic Science International, Vol. 124, No. 2-3, 27.12.2001, p. 104-111.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Arheart, Kristopher ; Pretty, Iain A. / Results of the 4th ABFO Bitemark Workshop - 1999. In: Forensic Science International. 2001 ; Vol. 124, No. 2-3. pp. 104-111.
@article{18ab9d671b0c425fb4bfe76677628601,
title = "Results of the 4th ABFO Bitemark Workshop - 1999",
abstract = "Thirty-two certified diplomates of the American Board of Forensic odontology (ABFO) participated in a study of the accuracy of bitemark analysis. Examiner experience as board-certified odontologists ranged from 2 to 22 years.Examiners were given sets of photographs (a cast in 1 case) of 4 bitemark cases and asked to report their certainty that each case was truly a bitemark and the apparent value of the case as forensic evidence. Participants also received 7 occluding sets of dental casts, 1 correct dentition for each case and three unrelated to any of the cases, and asked to rate how certain they were that each set of teeth had made each bitemark. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis resulted in an accuracy score of 0.86 (95{\%} CI=0.82-0.91). Youden's index was used to determine a cutoff point for determining an accuracy score for each case. Accuracy scores were significantly correlated with bitemark certainty and forensic value (P<0.001 in both cases) but not with examiner experience (P=0.958). The use of individual ROC analysis with weighted Youden's index to calibrate individual accuracy was also demonstrated.",
keywords = "Accuracy, Bitemark effectiveness, Diplomates, Forensic science, ROC, Validity",
author = "Kristopher Arheart and Pretty, {Iain A.}",
year = "2001",
month = "12",
day = "27",
doi = "10.1016/S0379-0738(01)00575-8",
language = "English",
volume = "124",
pages = "104--111",
journal = "Forensic Science International",
issn = "0379-0738",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "2-3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Results of the 4th ABFO Bitemark Workshop - 1999

AU - Arheart, Kristopher

AU - Pretty, Iain A.

PY - 2001/12/27

Y1 - 2001/12/27

N2 - Thirty-two certified diplomates of the American Board of Forensic odontology (ABFO) participated in a study of the accuracy of bitemark analysis. Examiner experience as board-certified odontologists ranged from 2 to 22 years.Examiners were given sets of photographs (a cast in 1 case) of 4 bitemark cases and asked to report their certainty that each case was truly a bitemark and the apparent value of the case as forensic evidence. Participants also received 7 occluding sets of dental casts, 1 correct dentition for each case and three unrelated to any of the cases, and asked to rate how certain they were that each set of teeth had made each bitemark. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis resulted in an accuracy score of 0.86 (95% CI=0.82-0.91). Youden's index was used to determine a cutoff point for determining an accuracy score for each case. Accuracy scores were significantly correlated with bitemark certainty and forensic value (P<0.001 in both cases) but not with examiner experience (P=0.958). The use of individual ROC analysis with weighted Youden's index to calibrate individual accuracy was also demonstrated.

AB - Thirty-two certified diplomates of the American Board of Forensic odontology (ABFO) participated in a study of the accuracy of bitemark analysis. Examiner experience as board-certified odontologists ranged from 2 to 22 years.Examiners were given sets of photographs (a cast in 1 case) of 4 bitemark cases and asked to report their certainty that each case was truly a bitemark and the apparent value of the case as forensic evidence. Participants also received 7 occluding sets of dental casts, 1 correct dentition for each case and three unrelated to any of the cases, and asked to rate how certain they were that each set of teeth had made each bitemark. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis resulted in an accuracy score of 0.86 (95% CI=0.82-0.91). Youden's index was used to determine a cutoff point for determining an accuracy score for each case. Accuracy scores were significantly correlated with bitemark certainty and forensic value (P<0.001 in both cases) but not with examiner experience (P=0.958). The use of individual ROC analysis with weighted Youden's index to calibrate individual accuracy was also demonstrated.

KW - Accuracy

KW - Bitemark effectiveness

KW - Diplomates

KW - Forensic science

KW - ROC

KW - Validity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035960885&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035960885&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0379-0738(01)00575-8

DO - 10.1016/S0379-0738(01)00575-8

M3 - Article

C2 - 11792497

AN - SCOPUS:0035960885

VL - 124

SP - 104

EP - 111

JO - Forensic Science International

JF - Forensic Science International

SN - 0379-0738

IS - 2-3

ER -