Response to comment on "observational and model evidence for positive low-level cloud feedback"

Amy C. Clement; Robert Burgman; Joel R. Norris

doi:10.1126/science.1187667

Response to comment on "observational and model evidence for positive low-level cloud feedback"

Amy C. Clement, Robert Burgman, Joel R. Norris

Atmospheric Sciences

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Broccoli and Klein argue for additional diagnostics to better assess the simulation of cloud feedbacks in climate models. We agree, and here provide additional analysis of two climate models that reveals where model deficiencies in cloud simulation in the Northeast Pacific may occur. Cloud diagnostics from the forthcoming Climate Model lntercomparison Project 5 should make such additional analyses possible for a large number of climate models.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	277b
Journal	Science
Volume	329
Issue number	5989
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1187667
State	Published - Jul 16 2010

ASJC Scopus subject areas

General

Access to Document

10.1126/science.1187667

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Response to comment on "observational and model evidence for positive low-level cloud feedback"'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Clement, A. C., Burgman, R., & Norris, J. R. (2010). Response to comment on "observational and model evidence for positive low-level cloud feedback". Science, 329(5989), 277b. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1187667

@article{21bb71975d174be38592f2895e914b85,

title = "Response to comment on {"}observational and model evidence for positive low-level cloud feedback{"}",

abstract = "Broccoli and Klein argue for additional diagnostics to better assess the simulation of cloud feedbacks in climate models. We agree, and here provide additional analysis of two climate models that reveals where model deficiencies in cloud simulation in the Northeast Pacific may occur. Cloud diagnostics from the forthcoming Climate Model lntercomparison Project 5 should make such additional analyses possible for a large number of climate models.",

author = "Clement, {Amy C.} and Robert Burgman and Norris, {Joel R.}",

year = "2010",

month = jul,

day = "16",

doi = "10.1126/science.1187667",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "329",

pages = "277b",

journal = "Science",

issn = "0036-8075",

publisher = "American Association for the Advancement of Science",

number = "5989",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Response to comment on "observational and model evidence for positive low-level cloud feedback"

AU - Clement, Amy C.

AU - Burgman, Robert

AU - Norris, Joel R.

PY - 2010/7/16

Y1 - 2010/7/16

N2 - Broccoli and Klein argue for additional diagnostics to better assess the simulation of cloud feedbacks in climate models. We agree, and here provide additional analysis of two climate models that reveals where model deficiencies in cloud simulation in the Northeast Pacific may occur. Cloud diagnostics from the forthcoming Climate Model lntercomparison Project 5 should make such additional analyses possible for a large number of climate models.

AB - Broccoli and Klein argue for additional diagnostics to better assess the simulation of cloud feedbacks in climate models. We agree, and here provide additional analysis of two climate models that reveals where model deficiencies in cloud simulation in the Northeast Pacific may occur. Cloud diagnostics from the forthcoming Climate Model lntercomparison Project 5 should make such additional analyses possible for a large number of climate models.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954776573&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77954776573&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1126/science.1187667

DO - 10.1126/science.1187667

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:77954776573

VL - 329

SP - 277b

JO - Science

JF - Science

SN - 0036-8075

IS - 5989

ER -