Resolution of slit-lamp microscopy photography using various cameras

Yufeng Ye, Hong Jiang, Huicheng Zhang, Carol Karp, Jianguang Zhong, Aizhu Tao, Yilei Shao, Jianhua Wang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the resolutions of slit-lamp microscopy photography using various cameras. Design: Evaluation of diagnostic test or technology. Participants: Healthy subjects were imaged with these adapted cameras through slit-lamp microscopy. Methods: A total of 8 cameras, including 6 custom-mounted slit-lamp cameras and 2 commercial slit-lamp cameras, were tested with standard slit-lamp microscopy devices for imaging of the eye. Various magnifications were used during imaging. A standard resolution test plate was used to test the resolutions at different magnifications. These outcomes were compared with commercial slit-lamp cameras. Main Outcome Measures: The main measurements included the display spatial resolutions, image spatial resolutions, and ocular resolutions. The outcome also includes the relationships between resolution and the pixel density of the displays and images. Results: All cameras were successfully adapted to the slit-lamp microscopy, and high-quality ocular images were obtained. Differences in the display spatial resolutions were found among cameras [analysis of variance (ANOVA), P<0.05]. Higher display resolutions were found with cameras using the high-definition multimedia interface (HDMI) compared with others, including cameras in smart phones. The display resolutions of smart phone displays were greater than cameras with video graphics array displays. The display spatial resolutions were found as a function of display pixel density (r>0.95, P<0.05) and magnification (r>0.85, P<0.05). Different image spatial resolutions were found among cameras (ANOVA, P<0.05) as a function of image pixel density (r>0.98, P<0.05) and magnification (r>0.85, P<0.05). The commercial slitlamp with a single lens reflex camera yielded the highest image spatial resolution. However, the ocular resolution through binocular viewing of the slit-lamp microscopy was found to have the highest resolution compared with the display and image spatial resolutions of all of the cameras. Conclusions: Several cameras can be adapted with slit-lamp microscopy for ophthalmic imaging, yielding various display and image spatial resolutions. However, the resolution seemed to not be as good as ocular viewing through the slit-lamp biomicroscope.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)205-213
Number of pages9
JournalEye and Contact Lens
Volume39
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2013

Fingerprint

Photography
Routine Diagnostic Tests
Lenses
Reflex
Slit Lamp Microscopy
Analysis of Variance
Healthy Volunteers
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Technology
Equipment and Supplies
Slit Lamp

Keywords

  • Photography
  • Slit-lamp microscopy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Resolution of slit-lamp microscopy photography using various cameras. / Ye, Yufeng; Jiang, Hong; Zhang, Huicheng; Karp, Carol; Zhong, Jianguang; Tao, Aizhu; Shao, Yilei; Wang, Jianhua.

In: Eye and Contact Lens, Vol. 39, No. 3, 01.05.2013, p. 205-213.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ye, Yufeng ; Jiang, Hong ; Zhang, Huicheng ; Karp, Carol ; Zhong, Jianguang ; Tao, Aizhu ; Shao, Yilei ; Wang, Jianhua. / Resolution of slit-lamp microscopy photography using various cameras. In: Eye and Contact Lens. 2013 ; Vol. 39, No. 3. pp. 205-213.
@article{06eba6da42364131babc1f74652f06d5,
title = "Resolution of slit-lamp microscopy photography using various cameras",
abstract = "Purpose: To evaluate the resolutions of slit-lamp microscopy photography using various cameras. Design: Evaluation of diagnostic test or technology. Participants: Healthy subjects were imaged with these adapted cameras through slit-lamp microscopy. Methods: A total of 8 cameras, including 6 custom-mounted slit-lamp cameras and 2 commercial slit-lamp cameras, were tested with standard slit-lamp microscopy devices for imaging of the eye. Various magnifications were used during imaging. A standard resolution test plate was used to test the resolutions at different magnifications. These outcomes were compared with commercial slit-lamp cameras. Main Outcome Measures: The main measurements included the display spatial resolutions, image spatial resolutions, and ocular resolutions. The outcome also includes the relationships between resolution and the pixel density of the displays and images. Results: All cameras were successfully adapted to the slit-lamp microscopy, and high-quality ocular images were obtained. Differences in the display spatial resolutions were found among cameras [analysis of variance (ANOVA), P<0.05]. Higher display resolutions were found with cameras using the high-definition multimedia interface (HDMI) compared with others, including cameras in smart phones. The display resolutions of smart phone displays were greater than cameras with video graphics array displays. The display spatial resolutions were found as a function of display pixel density (r>0.95, P<0.05) and magnification (r>0.85, P<0.05). Different image spatial resolutions were found among cameras (ANOVA, P<0.05) as a function of image pixel density (r>0.98, P<0.05) and magnification (r>0.85, P<0.05). The commercial slitlamp with a single lens reflex camera yielded the highest image spatial resolution. However, the ocular resolution through binocular viewing of the slit-lamp microscopy was found to have the highest resolution compared with the display and image spatial resolutions of all of the cameras. Conclusions: Several cameras can be adapted with slit-lamp microscopy for ophthalmic imaging, yielding various display and image spatial resolutions. However, the resolution seemed to not be as good as ocular viewing through the slit-lamp biomicroscope.",
keywords = "Photography, Slit-lamp microscopy",
author = "Yufeng Ye and Hong Jiang and Huicheng Zhang and Carol Karp and Jianguang Zhong and Aizhu Tao and Yilei Shao and Jianhua Wang",
year = "2013",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/ICL.0b013e318286bc0f",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "205--213",
journal = "Eye and Contact Lense",
issn = "1542-2321",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Resolution of slit-lamp microscopy photography using various cameras

AU - Ye, Yufeng

AU - Jiang, Hong

AU - Zhang, Huicheng

AU - Karp, Carol

AU - Zhong, Jianguang

AU - Tao, Aizhu

AU - Shao, Yilei

AU - Wang, Jianhua

PY - 2013/5/1

Y1 - 2013/5/1

N2 - Purpose: To evaluate the resolutions of slit-lamp microscopy photography using various cameras. Design: Evaluation of diagnostic test or technology. Participants: Healthy subjects were imaged with these adapted cameras through slit-lamp microscopy. Methods: A total of 8 cameras, including 6 custom-mounted slit-lamp cameras and 2 commercial slit-lamp cameras, were tested with standard slit-lamp microscopy devices for imaging of the eye. Various magnifications were used during imaging. A standard resolution test plate was used to test the resolutions at different magnifications. These outcomes were compared with commercial slit-lamp cameras. Main Outcome Measures: The main measurements included the display spatial resolutions, image spatial resolutions, and ocular resolutions. The outcome also includes the relationships between resolution and the pixel density of the displays and images. Results: All cameras were successfully adapted to the slit-lamp microscopy, and high-quality ocular images were obtained. Differences in the display spatial resolutions were found among cameras [analysis of variance (ANOVA), P<0.05]. Higher display resolutions were found with cameras using the high-definition multimedia interface (HDMI) compared with others, including cameras in smart phones. The display resolutions of smart phone displays were greater than cameras with video graphics array displays. The display spatial resolutions were found as a function of display pixel density (r>0.95, P<0.05) and magnification (r>0.85, P<0.05). Different image spatial resolutions were found among cameras (ANOVA, P<0.05) as a function of image pixel density (r>0.98, P<0.05) and magnification (r>0.85, P<0.05). The commercial slitlamp with a single lens reflex camera yielded the highest image spatial resolution. However, the ocular resolution through binocular viewing of the slit-lamp microscopy was found to have the highest resolution compared with the display and image spatial resolutions of all of the cameras. Conclusions: Several cameras can be adapted with slit-lamp microscopy for ophthalmic imaging, yielding various display and image spatial resolutions. However, the resolution seemed to not be as good as ocular viewing through the slit-lamp biomicroscope.

AB - Purpose: To evaluate the resolutions of slit-lamp microscopy photography using various cameras. Design: Evaluation of diagnostic test or technology. Participants: Healthy subjects were imaged with these adapted cameras through slit-lamp microscopy. Methods: A total of 8 cameras, including 6 custom-mounted slit-lamp cameras and 2 commercial slit-lamp cameras, were tested with standard slit-lamp microscopy devices for imaging of the eye. Various magnifications were used during imaging. A standard resolution test plate was used to test the resolutions at different magnifications. These outcomes were compared with commercial slit-lamp cameras. Main Outcome Measures: The main measurements included the display spatial resolutions, image spatial resolutions, and ocular resolutions. The outcome also includes the relationships between resolution and the pixel density of the displays and images. Results: All cameras were successfully adapted to the slit-lamp microscopy, and high-quality ocular images were obtained. Differences in the display spatial resolutions were found among cameras [analysis of variance (ANOVA), P<0.05]. Higher display resolutions were found with cameras using the high-definition multimedia interface (HDMI) compared with others, including cameras in smart phones. The display resolutions of smart phone displays were greater than cameras with video graphics array displays. The display spatial resolutions were found as a function of display pixel density (r>0.95, P<0.05) and magnification (r>0.85, P<0.05). Different image spatial resolutions were found among cameras (ANOVA, P<0.05) as a function of image pixel density (r>0.98, P<0.05) and magnification (r>0.85, P<0.05). The commercial slitlamp with a single lens reflex camera yielded the highest image spatial resolution. However, the ocular resolution through binocular viewing of the slit-lamp microscopy was found to have the highest resolution compared with the display and image spatial resolutions of all of the cameras. Conclusions: Several cameras can be adapted with slit-lamp microscopy for ophthalmic imaging, yielding various display and image spatial resolutions. However, the resolution seemed to not be as good as ocular viewing through the slit-lamp biomicroscope.

KW - Photography

KW - Slit-lamp microscopy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84877706170&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84877706170&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ICL.0b013e318286bc0f

DO - 10.1097/ICL.0b013e318286bc0f

M3 - Article

C2 - 23538733

AN - SCOPUS:84877706170

VL - 39

SP - 205

EP - 213

JO - Eye and Contact Lense

JF - Eye and Contact Lense

SN - 1542-2321

IS - 3

ER -