Resident selection of Hand Surgery Fellowships

A survey of the 2011, 2012, and 2013 Hand Fellowship graduates

Louis S. Brunworth, Shravan R. Chintalapani, Robert R. Gray, Roy Cardoso, Patrick Owens

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: We desired information from the recent, current, and future matched hand surgery fellows regarding their residency training, number of interviews, position matched, cost of interviewing, influences, opinions on future hand training models, and post-fellowship job information. Methods: Institutional review board approval was obtained from our institution to submit an online survey. An email was sent to the coordinators of all US Hand Fellowships to be forwarded to their fellows with graduation years 2011, 2012, and 2013, as well as directly to the fellows if their email addresses were provided. Data on the application process, relative importance of program attributes, and opinions regarding optimal training of a hand surgeon were collected. Statistical analysis was performed with respect to the training background and graduation year of the respondent. Results: The survey was completed by 137 hand surgery fellows. Seventy-one percent of the survey responders were from an orthopedic residency background, 20 % from plastic, and 7 % from general surgery. Forty-four percent of all of the respondents matched into their first choice. The type of operative cases performed by the current fellows was most often selected as very important when making their rank list. Seventy-seven percent of the respondents reflected their personal preference in fellowship model to be a 1-year fellowship program. Conclusions: The field of hand surgery is unique in that it has residents from multiple training backgrounds who all apply to one fellowship. The current fellowship model allows for diversity of training and the possibility of obtaining a second fellowship if desired.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)164-171
Number of pages8
JournalHand
Volume8
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2013

Fingerprint

Hand
Internship and Residency
Research Ethics Committees
Surveys and Questionnaires
Plastics
Orthopedics
Interviews
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • Fellowship
  • Hand
  • Residency
  • Survey
  • Training

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Surgery

Cite this

Resident selection of Hand Surgery Fellowships : A survey of the 2011, 2012, and 2013 Hand Fellowship graduates. / Brunworth, Louis S.; Chintalapani, Shravan R.; Gray, Robert R.; Cardoso, Roy; Owens, Patrick.

In: Hand, Vol. 8, No. 2, 01.06.2013, p. 164-171.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Brunworth, Louis S. ; Chintalapani, Shravan R. ; Gray, Robert R. ; Cardoso, Roy ; Owens, Patrick. / Resident selection of Hand Surgery Fellowships : A survey of the 2011, 2012, and 2013 Hand Fellowship graduates. In: Hand. 2013 ; Vol. 8, No. 2. pp. 164-171.
@article{e9cadd1f12a040babd7c75d9398510ef,
title = "Resident selection of Hand Surgery Fellowships: A survey of the 2011, 2012, and 2013 Hand Fellowship graduates",
abstract = "Background: We desired information from the recent, current, and future matched hand surgery fellows regarding their residency training, number of interviews, position matched, cost of interviewing, influences, opinions on future hand training models, and post-fellowship job information. Methods: Institutional review board approval was obtained from our institution to submit an online survey. An email was sent to the coordinators of all US Hand Fellowships to be forwarded to their fellows with graduation years 2011, 2012, and 2013, as well as directly to the fellows if their email addresses were provided. Data on the application process, relative importance of program attributes, and opinions regarding optimal training of a hand surgeon were collected. Statistical analysis was performed with respect to the training background and graduation year of the respondent. Results: The survey was completed by 137 hand surgery fellows. Seventy-one percent of the survey responders were from an orthopedic residency background, 20 {\%} from plastic, and 7 {\%} from general surgery. Forty-four percent of all of the respondents matched into their first choice. The type of operative cases performed by the current fellows was most often selected as very important when making their rank list. Seventy-seven percent of the respondents reflected their personal preference in fellowship model to be a 1-year fellowship program. Conclusions: The field of hand surgery is unique in that it has residents from multiple training backgrounds who all apply to one fellowship. The current fellowship model allows for diversity of training and the possibility of obtaining a second fellowship if desired.",
keywords = "Fellowship, Hand, Residency, Survey, Training",
author = "Brunworth, {Louis S.} and Chintalapani, {Shravan R.} and Gray, {Robert R.} and Roy Cardoso and Patrick Owens",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11552-013-9504-y",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "164--171",
journal = "Journal of Hand Surgery",
issn = "0266-7681",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Resident selection of Hand Surgery Fellowships

T2 - A survey of the 2011, 2012, and 2013 Hand Fellowship graduates

AU - Brunworth, Louis S.

AU - Chintalapani, Shravan R.

AU - Gray, Robert R.

AU - Cardoso, Roy

AU - Owens, Patrick

PY - 2013/6/1

Y1 - 2013/6/1

N2 - Background: We desired information from the recent, current, and future matched hand surgery fellows regarding their residency training, number of interviews, position matched, cost of interviewing, influences, opinions on future hand training models, and post-fellowship job information. Methods: Institutional review board approval was obtained from our institution to submit an online survey. An email was sent to the coordinators of all US Hand Fellowships to be forwarded to their fellows with graduation years 2011, 2012, and 2013, as well as directly to the fellows if their email addresses were provided. Data on the application process, relative importance of program attributes, and opinions regarding optimal training of a hand surgeon were collected. Statistical analysis was performed with respect to the training background and graduation year of the respondent. Results: The survey was completed by 137 hand surgery fellows. Seventy-one percent of the survey responders were from an orthopedic residency background, 20 % from plastic, and 7 % from general surgery. Forty-four percent of all of the respondents matched into their first choice. The type of operative cases performed by the current fellows was most often selected as very important when making their rank list. Seventy-seven percent of the respondents reflected their personal preference in fellowship model to be a 1-year fellowship program. Conclusions: The field of hand surgery is unique in that it has residents from multiple training backgrounds who all apply to one fellowship. The current fellowship model allows for diversity of training and the possibility of obtaining a second fellowship if desired.

AB - Background: We desired information from the recent, current, and future matched hand surgery fellows regarding their residency training, number of interviews, position matched, cost of interviewing, influences, opinions on future hand training models, and post-fellowship job information. Methods: Institutional review board approval was obtained from our institution to submit an online survey. An email was sent to the coordinators of all US Hand Fellowships to be forwarded to their fellows with graduation years 2011, 2012, and 2013, as well as directly to the fellows if their email addresses were provided. Data on the application process, relative importance of program attributes, and opinions regarding optimal training of a hand surgeon were collected. Statistical analysis was performed with respect to the training background and graduation year of the respondent. Results: The survey was completed by 137 hand surgery fellows. Seventy-one percent of the survey responders were from an orthopedic residency background, 20 % from plastic, and 7 % from general surgery. Forty-four percent of all of the respondents matched into their first choice. The type of operative cases performed by the current fellows was most often selected as very important when making their rank list. Seventy-seven percent of the respondents reflected their personal preference in fellowship model to be a 1-year fellowship program. Conclusions: The field of hand surgery is unique in that it has residents from multiple training backgrounds who all apply to one fellowship. The current fellowship model allows for diversity of training and the possibility of obtaining a second fellowship if desired.

KW - Fellowship

KW - Hand

KW - Residency

KW - Survey

KW - Training

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84877739670&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84877739670&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11552-013-9504-y

DO - 10.1007/s11552-013-9504-y

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 164

EP - 171

JO - Journal of Hand Surgery

JF - Journal of Hand Surgery

SN - 0266-7681

IS - 2

ER -