Abstract
Time and timeliness are key issues in appraising and ensuring the clinical relevance of systematic reviews. Time considerations entering the systematic review process include the history of the clinical problem, disease, or treatment that is the target of the review, and the history of the research conducted to address it. These considerations guide: (i) formulation of the research problems and questions; (ii) setting of parameters for the search and retrieval of studies; (iii) determination of inclusion and exclusion criteria; (iv) appraisal of the clinical relevance of findings; (v) selection of the findings that will be synthesized; and (vi) interpretation of the results of that synthesis.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 454-462 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice |
Volume | 12 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Aug 2006 |
Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- Antiretroviral medication adherence
- Clinical relevance
- HIV/AIDS
- Quantitative research
- Systematic reviews
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Health Information Management
- Nursing(all)
Cite this
Research results have expiration dates : Ensuring timely systematic reviews. / Barroso, Julie; Sandelowski, Margarete; Voils, Corrine I.
In: Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, Vol. 12, No. 4, 08.2006, p. 454-462.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Research results have expiration dates
T2 - Ensuring timely systematic reviews
AU - Barroso, Julie
AU - Sandelowski, Margarete
AU - Voils, Corrine I.
PY - 2006/8
Y1 - 2006/8
N2 - Time and timeliness are key issues in appraising and ensuring the clinical relevance of systematic reviews. Time considerations entering the systematic review process include the history of the clinical problem, disease, or treatment that is the target of the review, and the history of the research conducted to address it. These considerations guide: (i) formulation of the research problems and questions; (ii) setting of parameters for the search and retrieval of studies; (iii) determination of inclusion and exclusion criteria; (iv) appraisal of the clinical relevance of findings; (v) selection of the findings that will be synthesized; and (vi) interpretation of the results of that synthesis.
AB - Time and timeliness are key issues in appraising and ensuring the clinical relevance of systematic reviews. Time considerations entering the systematic review process include the history of the clinical problem, disease, or treatment that is the target of the review, and the history of the research conducted to address it. These considerations guide: (i) formulation of the research problems and questions; (ii) setting of parameters for the search and retrieval of studies; (iii) determination of inclusion and exclusion criteria; (iv) appraisal of the clinical relevance of findings; (v) selection of the findings that will be synthesized; and (vi) interpretation of the results of that synthesis.
KW - Antiretroviral medication adherence
KW - Clinical relevance
KW - HIV/AIDS
KW - Quantitative research
KW - Systematic reviews
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33746385852&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33746385852&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00729.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00729.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 16907690
AN - SCOPUS:33746385852
VL - 12
SP - 454
EP - 462
JO - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
JF - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
SN - 1356-1294
IS - 4
ER -