Representational gaps, team Integration and team creativity

Laurie R. Weingart, Gergana Todorova, Matthew A. Cronin

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Functional diversity is central to the performance of product development teams in that multiple perspectives increase the team's creativity. Failures in cross-functional product development teams (CFPDTs) are often attributed to a team's inability to capitalize on their diversity. In this study we develop and test a model based on the representational gaps perspective (Cronin & Weingart, 2007; Weingart, Cronin, Houser, Cagan, & Vogel, 2005) to determine factors that promote or limit creativity in CFPDTs. In particular we examine how representational gaps and cognitive and affective integration in CFPDTs affect coordination and conflict, which in turn influence the novelty and usefulness of the products designed. Furthermore, we investigate when conflict resulting from the representational gaps stimulates or harms creativity. We test these relationships using a path analysis on data across two time periods from cross-functional product development student teams. Representational gaps, affective integration, and cognitive integration were found to collectively improve team creativity via task conflict, relationship conflict, and coordination. Representational gaps and cognitive integration largely influenced creativity through task conflict, coordination, and conflict management. Affective integration operated via its effect on relationship conflict and an interactive effect with cognitive integration on task conflict. Furthermore, the effects of conflict and coordination on creativity depended on the conflict management approach used by the group. We discuss these findings in detail and end by considering the implications for the management of cross functional teams engaged in potentially creative work.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationAcademy of Management 2008 Annual Meeting: The Questions We Ask, AOM 2008
StatePublished - 2008
Externally publishedYes
Event68th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, AOM 2008 - Anaheim, CA, United States
Duration: Aug 8 2008Aug 13 2008

Other

Other68th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, AOM 2008
CountryUnited States
CityAnaheim, CA
Period8/8/088/13/08

Fingerprint

Product development
Creativity
Students
Task conflict
Conflict management
Relationship conflict

Keywords

  • Shared cognition
  • Team conflict
  • Team creativity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Management Information Systems
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

Weingart, L. R., Todorova, G., & Cronin, M. A. (2008). Representational gaps, team Integration and team creativity. In Academy of Management 2008 Annual Meeting: The Questions We Ask, AOM 2008

Representational gaps, team Integration and team creativity. / Weingart, Laurie R.; Todorova, Gergana; Cronin, Matthew A.

Academy of Management 2008 Annual Meeting: The Questions We Ask, AOM 2008. 2008.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Weingart, LR, Todorova, G & Cronin, MA 2008, Representational gaps, team Integration and team creativity. in Academy of Management 2008 Annual Meeting: The Questions We Ask, AOM 2008. 68th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, AOM 2008, Anaheim, CA, United States, 8/8/08.
Weingart LR, Todorova G, Cronin MA. Representational gaps, team Integration and team creativity. In Academy of Management 2008 Annual Meeting: The Questions We Ask, AOM 2008. 2008
Weingart, Laurie R. ; Todorova, Gergana ; Cronin, Matthew A. / Representational gaps, team Integration and team creativity. Academy of Management 2008 Annual Meeting: The Questions We Ask, AOM 2008. 2008.
@inproceedings{45b70b78bca741ef99fec5f30ae8d087,
title = "Representational gaps, team Integration and team creativity",
abstract = "Functional diversity is central to the performance of product development teams in that multiple perspectives increase the team's creativity. Failures in cross-functional product development teams (CFPDTs) are often attributed to a team's inability to capitalize on their diversity. In this study we develop and test a model based on the representational gaps perspective (Cronin & Weingart, 2007; Weingart, Cronin, Houser, Cagan, & Vogel, 2005) to determine factors that promote or limit creativity in CFPDTs. In particular we examine how representational gaps and cognitive and affective integration in CFPDTs affect coordination and conflict, which in turn influence the novelty and usefulness of the products designed. Furthermore, we investigate when conflict resulting from the representational gaps stimulates or harms creativity. We test these relationships using a path analysis on data across two time periods from cross-functional product development student teams. Representational gaps, affective integration, and cognitive integration were found to collectively improve team creativity via task conflict, relationship conflict, and coordination. Representational gaps and cognitive integration largely influenced creativity through task conflict, coordination, and conflict management. Affective integration operated via its effect on relationship conflict and an interactive effect with cognitive integration on task conflict. Furthermore, the effects of conflict and coordination on creativity depended on the conflict management approach used by the group. We discuss these findings in detail and end by considering the implications for the management of cross functional teams engaged in potentially creative work.",
keywords = "Shared cognition, Team conflict, Team creativity",
author = "Weingart, {Laurie R.} and Gergana Todorova and Cronin, {Matthew A.}",
year = "2008",
language = "English (US)",
booktitle = "Academy of Management 2008 Annual Meeting: The Questions We Ask, AOM 2008",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Representational gaps, team Integration and team creativity

AU - Weingart, Laurie R.

AU - Todorova, Gergana

AU - Cronin, Matthew A.

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Functional diversity is central to the performance of product development teams in that multiple perspectives increase the team's creativity. Failures in cross-functional product development teams (CFPDTs) are often attributed to a team's inability to capitalize on their diversity. In this study we develop and test a model based on the representational gaps perspective (Cronin & Weingart, 2007; Weingart, Cronin, Houser, Cagan, & Vogel, 2005) to determine factors that promote or limit creativity in CFPDTs. In particular we examine how representational gaps and cognitive and affective integration in CFPDTs affect coordination and conflict, which in turn influence the novelty and usefulness of the products designed. Furthermore, we investigate when conflict resulting from the representational gaps stimulates or harms creativity. We test these relationships using a path analysis on data across two time periods from cross-functional product development student teams. Representational gaps, affective integration, and cognitive integration were found to collectively improve team creativity via task conflict, relationship conflict, and coordination. Representational gaps and cognitive integration largely influenced creativity through task conflict, coordination, and conflict management. Affective integration operated via its effect on relationship conflict and an interactive effect with cognitive integration on task conflict. Furthermore, the effects of conflict and coordination on creativity depended on the conflict management approach used by the group. We discuss these findings in detail and end by considering the implications for the management of cross functional teams engaged in potentially creative work.

AB - Functional diversity is central to the performance of product development teams in that multiple perspectives increase the team's creativity. Failures in cross-functional product development teams (CFPDTs) are often attributed to a team's inability to capitalize on their diversity. In this study we develop and test a model based on the representational gaps perspective (Cronin & Weingart, 2007; Weingart, Cronin, Houser, Cagan, & Vogel, 2005) to determine factors that promote or limit creativity in CFPDTs. In particular we examine how representational gaps and cognitive and affective integration in CFPDTs affect coordination and conflict, which in turn influence the novelty and usefulness of the products designed. Furthermore, we investigate when conflict resulting from the representational gaps stimulates or harms creativity. We test these relationships using a path analysis on data across two time periods from cross-functional product development student teams. Representational gaps, affective integration, and cognitive integration were found to collectively improve team creativity via task conflict, relationship conflict, and coordination. Representational gaps and cognitive integration largely influenced creativity through task conflict, coordination, and conflict management. Affective integration operated via its effect on relationship conflict and an interactive effect with cognitive integration on task conflict. Furthermore, the effects of conflict and coordination on creativity depended on the conflict management approach used by the group. We discuss these findings in detail and end by considering the implications for the management of cross functional teams engaged in potentially creative work.

KW - Shared cognition

KW - Team conflict

KW - Team creativity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858427876&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84858427876&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

BT - Academy of Management 2008 Annual Meeting: The Questions We Ask, AOM 2008

ER -