Reply to Noddings, Darwall, Wren, and Fullinwider

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

I respond to Noddings with further clarification of the notion of empathy and also argue that previous care ethics has put too much of an exclusive emphasis on relationships. I respond to Darwall by pointing out some implausible implications of his own and Kantian views about respect and by showing how a sentimentalist approach can avoid those difficulties. In my reply to Wren I indicate how a sentimentalist metaethics can be accurate to what we mean by 'right' and 'wrong' even if Kantians and others would emphatically deny what it says about these terms. And, finally, I argue that Fullinwider's dismissive remarks on moral theories fail to reckon with what is significant and important about moral theorizing and also point out how a sentimentalist ethics and its view of moral education can, pace Fullinwider, be of some practical use to moral educators.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)187-197
Number of pages11
JournalTheory and Research in Education
Volume8
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010

Fingerprint

moral philosophy
moral education
empathy
respect
educator

Keywords

  • empathy
  • metaethics
  • moral education
  • moral theories
  • relationships
  • respect

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Reply to Noddings, Darwall, Wren, and Fullinwider. / Slote, Michael.

In: Theory and Research in Education, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2010, p. 187-197.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7ad5805535964c8e8791219caf7363d6,
title = "Reply to Noddings, Darwall, Wren, and Fullinwider",
abstract = "I respond to Noddings with further clarification of the notion of empathy and also argue that previous care ethics has put too much of an exclusive emphasis on relationships. I respond to Darwall by pointing out some implausible implications of his own and Kantian views about respect and by showing how a sentimentalist approach can avoid those difficulties. In my reply to Wren I indicate how a sentimentalist metaethics can be accurate to what we mean by 'right' and 'wrong' even if Kantians and others would emphatically deny what it says about these terms. And, finally, I argue that Fullinwider's dismissive remarks on moral theories fail to reckon with what is significant and important about moral theorizing and also point out how a sentimentalist ethics and its view of moral education can, pace Fullinwider, be of some practical use to moral educators.",
keywords = "empathy, metaethics, moral education, moral theories, relationships, respect",
author = "Michael Slote",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1177/1477878510368626",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "187--197",
journal = "Theory and Research in Education",
issn = "1477-8785",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reply to Noddings, Darwall, Wren, and Fullinwider

AU - Slote, Michael

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - I respond to Noddings with further clarification of the notion of empathy and also argue that previous care ethics has put too much of an exclusive emphasis on relationships. I respond to Darwall by pointing out some implausible implications of his own and Kantian views about respect and by showing how a sentimentalist approach can avoid those difficulties. In my reply to Wren I indicate how a sentimentalist metaethics can be accurate to what we mean by 'right' and 'wrong' even if Kantians and others would emphatically deny what it says about these terms. And, finally, I argue that Fullinwider's dismissive remarks on moral theories fail to reckon with what is significant and important about moral theorizing and also point out how a sentimentalist ethics and its view of moral education can, pace Fullinwider, be of some practical use to moral educators.

AB - I respond to Noddings with further clarification of the notion of empathy and also argue that previous care ethics has put too much of an exclusive emphasis on relationships. I respond to Darwall by pointing out some implausible implications of his own and Kantian views about respect and by showing how a sentimentalist approach can avoid those difficulties. In my reply to Wren I indicate how a sentimentalist metaethics can be accurate to what we mean by 'right' and 'wrong' even if Kantians and others would emphatically deny what it says about these terms. And, finally, I argue that Fullinwider's dismissive remarks on moral theories fail to reckon with what is significant and important about moral theorizing and also point out how a sentimentalist ethics and its view of moral education can, pace Fullinwider, be of some practical use to moral educators.

KW - empathy

KW - metaethics

KW - moral education

KW - moral theories

KW - relationships

KW - respect

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955339698&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77955339698&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1477878510368626

DO - 10.1177/1477878510368626

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77955339698

VL - 8

SP - 187

EP - 197

JO - Theory and Research in Education

JF - Theory and Research in Education

SN - 1477-8785

IS - 2

ER -