Reply to: Comments on "design of supervised classifiers using boolean neural networks"

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

In his comments, Guy Smith discussed three points he believes are either not correct or unclear. These points are: 1) The uniqueness of thermometer coding in the algorithm is not supported in the paper. 2) The BKNN algorithm is not equivalent to the k-nearest neighbor algorithm. 3) The relationship between examplars and classes is not clear. Following is a reply to each of the above three points:

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)957-958
Number of pages2
JournalIEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Volume21
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 1999
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Software
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Applied Mathematics

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Reply to: Comments on "design of supervised classifiers using boolean neural networks"'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this