Reply to

Comments on "design of supervised classifiers using boolean neural networks"

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In his comments, Guy Smith discussed three points he believes are either not correct or unclear. These points are: 1) The uniqueness of thermometer coding in the algorithm is not supported in the paper. 2) The BKNN algorithm is not equivalent to the k-nearest neighbor algorithm. 3) The relationship between examplars and classes is not clear. Following is a reply to each of the above three points:

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)957-958
Number of pages2
JournalIEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Volume21
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Boolean Networks
Classifiers
Classifier
Neural Networks
Neural networks
Thermometer
Thermometers
Nearest Neighbor
Uniqueness
Coding
Design

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Control and Systems Engineering
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Cite this

@article{3d4ebae78ead426987ea23f83c824d44,
title = "Reply to: Comments on {"}design of supervised classifiers using boolean neural networks{"}",
abstract = "In his comments, Guy Smith discussed three points he believes are either not correct or unclear. These points are: 1) The uniqueness of thermometer coding in the algorithm is not supported in the paper. 2) The BKNN algorithm is not equivalent to the k-nearest neighbor algorithm. 3) The relationship between examplars and classes is not clear. Following is a reply to each of the above three points:",
author = "Kabuka, {Mansur R.}",
year = "1999",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1109/TPAMI.1999.790439",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "957--958",
journal = "IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence",
issn = "0162-8828",
publisher = "IEEE Computer Society",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reply to

T2 - Comments on "design of supervised classifiers using boolean neural networks"

AU - Kabuka, Mansur R.

PY - 1999/12/1

Y1 - 1999/12/1

N2 - In his comments, Guy Smith discussed three points he believes are either not correct or unclear. These points are: 1) The uniqueness of thermometer coding in the algorithm is not supported in the paper. 2) The BKNN algorithm is not equivalent to the k-nearest neighbor algorithm. 3) The relationship between examplars and classes is not clear. Following is a reply to each of the above three points:

AB - In his comments, Guy Smith discussed three points he believes are either not correct or unclear. These points are: 1) The uniqueness of thermometer coding in the algorithm is not supported in the paper. 2) The BKNN algorithm is not equivalent to the k-nearest neighbor algorithm. 3) The relationship between examplars and classes is not clear. Following is a reply to each of the above three points:

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33747515985&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33747515985&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/TPAMI.1999.790439

DO - 10.1109/TPAMI.1999.790439

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 957

EP - 958

JO - IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence

JF - IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence

SN - 0162-8828

IS - 9

ER -