Abstract
In his comments, Guy Smith discussed three points he believes are either not correct or unclear. These points are: 1) The uniqueness of thermometer coding in the algorithm is not supported in the paper. 2) The BKNN algorithm is not equivalent to the k-nearest neighbor algorithm. 3) The relationship between examplars and classes is not clear. Following is a reply to each of the above three points:
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 957-958 |
Number of pages | 2 |
Journal | IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence |
Volume | 21 |
Issue number | 9 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 1999 |
Externally published | Yes |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Software
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Computational Theory and Mathematics
- Artificial Intelligence
- Applied Mathematics