Reorganizing the instructional reading components

Could there be a better way to design remedial reading programs to maximize middle school students with reading disabilities' response to treatment?

Mary Calhoon, Alexia Sandow, Charles V. Hunter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The primary purpose of this study was to explore if there could be a more beneficial method in organizing the individual instructional reading components (phonological decoding, spelling, fluency, and reading comprehension) within a remedial reading program to increase sensitivity to instruction for middle school students with reading disabilities (RD). Three different modules (Alternating, Integrated, and Additive) of the Reading Achievement Multi-Modular Program were implemented with 90 middle school (sixth to eighth grades) students with reading disabilities. Instruction occurred 45 min a day, 5 days a week, for 26 weeks, for approximately 97 h of remedial reading instruction. To assess gains, reading subtests of the Woodcock Johnson-III, the Gray Silent Reading Test, and Oral Reading Fluency passages were administered. Results showed that students in the Additive module outperformed students in the Alternating and Integrated modules on phonological decoding and spelling and students in the Integrated module on comprehension skills. Findings for the two oral reading fluency measures demonstrated a differential pattern of results across modules. Results are discussed in regards to the effect of the organization of each module on the responsiveness of middle school students with RD to instruction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)57-85
Number of pages29
JournalAnnals of Dyslexia
Volume60
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Reading
disability
Students
student
Therapeutics
instruction
comprehension
reading instruction
school grade
organization

Keywords

  • Adolescent literacy
  • Fluency
  • Phonological decoding
  • Reading comprehension
  • Remedial reading
  • Spelling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Speech and Hearing
  • Education

Cite this

@article{f269b63ee3c345a99885da358eb28c4b,
title = "Reorganizing the instructional reading components: Could there be a better way to design remedial reading programs to maximize middle school students with reading disabilities' response to treatment?",
abstract = "The primary purpose of this study was to explore if there could be a more beneficial method in organizing the individual instructional reading components (phonological decoding, spelling, fluency, and reading comprehension) within a remedial reading program to increase sensitivity to instruction for middle school students with reading disabilities (RD). Three different modules (Alternating, Integrated, and Additive) of the Reading Achievement Multi-Modular Program were implemented with 90 middle school (sixth to eighth grades) students with reading disabilities. Instruction occurred 45 min a day, 5 days a week, for 26 weeks, for approximately 97 h of remedial reading instruction. To assess gains, reading subtests of the Woodcock Johnson-III, the Gray Silent Reading Test, and Oral Reading Fluency passages were administered. Results showed that students in the Additive module outperformed students in the Alternating and Integrated modules on phonological decoding and spelling and students in the Integrated module on comprehension skills. Findings for the two oral reading fluency measures demonstrated a differential pattern of results across modules. Results are discussed in regards to the effect of the organization of each module on the responsiveness of middle school students with RD to instruction.",
keywords = "Adolescent literacy, Fluency, Phonological decoding, Reading comprehension, Remedial reading, Spelling",
author = "Mary Calhoon and Alexia Sandow and Hunter, {Charles V.}",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1007/s11881-009-0033-x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "60",
pages = "57--85",
journal = "Annals of Dyslexia",
issn = "0736-9387",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reorganizing the instructional reading components

T2 - Could there be a better way to design remedial reading programs to maximize middle school students with reading disabilities' response to treatment?

AU - Calhoon, Mary

AU - Sandow, Alexia

AU - Hunter, Charles V.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - The primary purpose of this study was to explore if there could be a more beneficial method in organizing the individual instructional reading components (phonological decoding, spelling, fluency, and reading comprehension) within a remedial reading program to increase sensitivity to instruction for middle school students with reading disabilities (RD). Three different modules (Alternating, Integrated, and Additive) of the Reading Achievement Multi-Modular Program were implemented with 90 middle school (sixth to eighth grades) students with reading disabilities. Instruction occurred 45 min a day, 5 days a week, for 26 weeks, for approximately 97 h of remedial reading instruction. To assess gains, reading subtests of the Woodcock Johnson-III, the Gray Silent Reading Test, and Oral Reading Fluency passages were administered. Results showed that students in the Additive module outperformed students in the Alternating and Integrated modules on phonological decoding and spelling and students in the Integrated module on comprehension skills. Findings for the two oral reading fluency measures demonstrated a differential pattern of results across modules. Results are discussed in regards to the effect of the organization of each module on the responsiveness of middle school students with RD to instruction.

AB - The primary purpose of this study was to explore if there could be a more beneficial method in organizing the individual instructional reading components (phonological decoding, spelling, fluency, and reading comprehension) within a remedial reading program to increase sensitivity to instruction for middle school students with reading disabilities (RD). Three different modules (Alternating, Integrated, and Additive) of the Reading Achievement Multi-Modular Program were implemented with 90 middle school (sixth to eighth grades) students with reading disabilities. Instruction occurred 45 min a day, 5 days a week, for 26 weeks, for approximately 97 h of remedial reading instruction. To assess gains, reading subtests of the Woodcock Johnson-III, the Gray Silent Reading Test, and Oral Reading Fluency passages were administered. Results showed that students in the Additive module outperformed students in the Alternating and Integrated modules on phonological decoding and spelling and students in the Integrated module on comprehension skills. Findings for the two oral reading fluency measures demonstrated a differential pattern of results across modules. Results are discussed in regards to the effect of the organization of each module on the responsiveness of middle school students with RD to instruction.

KW - Adolescent literacy

KW - Fluency

KW - Phonological decoding

KW - Reading comprehension

KW - Remedial reading

KW - Spelling

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954035541&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77954035541&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11881-009-0033-x

DO - 10.1007/s11881-009-0033-x

M3 - Article

VL - 60

SP - 57

EP - 85

JO - Annals of Dyslexia

JF - Annals of Dyslexia

SN - 0736-9387

IS - 1

ER -