Renal pelvic stones: Choosing shock wave lithotripsy or percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Robert Marcovich, Arthur D. Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction of minimally invasive techniques has revolutionized the surgical management of renal calculi. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy are now both well-established procedures. Each modality has advantages and disadvantages, and the application of each should be based on well-defined factors. These variables include stone factors such as number, size, and composition; factors related to the stone's environment, including the stone's location, spatial anatomy of the renal collecting system, presence of hydronephrosis, and other anatomic variables, such as the presence of calyceal diverticula and renal anomalies; and clinical or patient factors like morbid obesity, the presence of a solitary kidney, and renal insufficiency. The morbidity of each procedure in relation to its efficacy should be taken in to account. This article will review current knowledge and suggest an algorithm for the rational management of renal calculi with shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)195-207
Number of pages13
JournalInternational Braz J Urol
Volume29
Issue number3
StatePublished - May 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Percutaneous Nephrostomy
Kidney Calculi
Lithotripsy
Renal Insufficiency
Kidney
Morbid Obesity
Hydronephrosis
Diverticulum
Anatomy
Morbidity

Keywords

  • Kidney
  • Kidney calculi
  • Lithotripsy
  • Nephrolithotomy
  • Percutaneous
  • Shock wave lithotripsy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nephrology

Cite this

Renal pelvic stones : Choosing shock wave lithotripsy or percutaneous nephrolithotomy. / Marcovich, Robert; Smith, Arthur D.

In: International Braz J Urol, Vol. 29, No. 3, 05.2003, p. 195-207.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a57d96ed307541bc9818c6e2f30c88d7,
title = "Renal pelvic stones: Choosing shock wave lithotripsy or percutaneous nephrolithotomy",
abstract = "Introduction of minimally invasive techniques has revolutionized the surgical management of renal calculi. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy are now both well-established procedures. Each modality has advantages and disadvantages, and the application of each should be based on well-defined factors. These variables include stone factors such as number, size, and composition; factors related to the stone's environment, including the stone's location, spatial anatomy of the renal collecting system, presence of hydronephrosis, and other anatomic variables, such as the presence of calyceal diverticula and renal anomalies; and clinical or patient factors like morbid obesity, the presence of a solitary kidney, and renal insufficiency. The morbidity of each procedure in relation to its efficacy should be taken in to account. This article will review current knowledge and suggest an algorithm for the rational management of renal calculi with shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy.",
keywords = "Kidney, Kidney calculi, Lithotripsy, Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous, Shock wave lithotripsy",
author = "Robert Marcovich and Smith, {Arthur D.}",
year = "2003",
month = "5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "195--207",
journal = "International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology",
issn = "1677-5538",
publisher = "Brazilian Society of Urology",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Renal pelvic stones

T2 - Choosing shock wave lithotripsy or percutaneous nephrolithotomy

AU - Marcovich, Robert

AU - Smith, Arthur D.

PY - 2003/5

Y1 - 2003/5

N2 - Introduction of minimally invasive techniques has revolutionized the surgical management of renal calculi. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy are now both well-established procedures. Each modality has advantages and disadvantages, and the application of each should be based on well-defined factors. These variables include stone factors such as number, size, and composition; factors related to the stone's environment, including the stone's location, spatial anatomy of the renal collecting system, presence of hydronephrosis, and other anatomic variables, such as the presence of calyceal diverticula and renal anomalies; and clinical or patient factors like morbid obesity, the presence of a solitary kidney, and renal insufficiency. The morbidity of each procedure in relation to its efficacy should be taken in to account. This article will review current knowledge and suggest an algorithm for the rational management of renal calculi with shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

AB - Introduction of minimally invasive techniques has revolutionized the surgical management of renal calculi. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy are now both well-established procedures. Each modality has advantages and disadvantages, and the application of each should be based on well-defined factors. These variables include stone factors such as number, size, and composition; factors related to the stone's environment, including the stone's location, spatial anatomy of the renal collecting system, presence of hydronephrosis, and other anatomic variables, such as the presence of calyceal diverticula and renal anomalies; and clinical or patient factors like morbid obesity, the presence of a solitary kidney, and renal insufficiency. The morbidity of each procedure in relation to its efficacy should be taken in to account. This article will review current knowledge and suggest an algorithm for the rational management of renal calculi with shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

KW - Kidney

KW - Kidney calculi

KW - Lithotripsy

KW - Nephrolithotomy

KW - Percutaneous

KW - Shock wave lithotripsy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0041629352&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0041629352&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 15745522

AN - SCOPUS:0041629352

VL - 29

SP - 195

EP - 207

JO - International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology

JF - International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology

SN - 1677-5538

IS - 3

ER -