Renal artery stenosis: To intervene, or not to intervene, "that is the question"

Syed S. Haqqie, Anthony Nappi, Gary Siskin, Nouman A. Syed, Ketan Ghate, Roy O. Mathew, Jeffrey Wang, Mandeep S. Sidhu, Vishesh Kumar, Loay Salman, Donna Merrill, Muhammad Ut Akmal, Ali Nayer, Arif Asif

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations


Renal artery stenosis (RAS) due to atherosclerosis continues to be a major cause of secondary hypertension. It can also lead to renal dysfunction due to ischemic nephropathy. While major clinical trials have emphasized that medical management should be preferred over angioplasty and stenting for the treatment of renal artery stenosis, clinical scenarios continue to raise doubts about the optimal management strategy. Herein, we present two cases that were admitted with hypertensive emergency and renal function deterioration. Medical therapy failed to control the blood pressure and in one patient, renal failure progressed to a point where renal replacement therapy was required. Both patients underwent angioplasty (for >90% stenosis) and stent insertion with successful resolution of stenosis by interventional radiology. Postoperatively, blood pressure gradually decreased with improvement in serum creatinine. Dialysis therapy was discontinued. At 4- and 8-month follow-up, both patients continue to do well with blood pressure readings in the 132-145/70-90 mmHg range. This article highlights the importance of percutaneous interventions in the management of atherosclerotic RAS and calls for heightened awareness and careful identification of candidates who would benefit from angioplasty and stent insertion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)E4-E7
JournalSeminars in Dialysis
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 2014
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nephrology


Dive into the research topics of 'Renal artery stenosis: To intervene, or not to intervene, "that is the question"'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this