Remote Sensing of Droplet Number Concentration in Warm Clouds: A Review of the Current State of Knowledge and Perspectives

Daniel P. Grosvenor, Odran Sourdeval, Paquita Zuidema, Andrew Ackerman, Mikhail D. Alexandrov, Ralf Bennartz, Reinout Boers, Brian Cairns, J. Christine Chiu, Matthew Christensen, Hartwig Deneke, Michael Diamond, Graham Feingold, Ann Fridlind, Anja Hünerbein, Christine Knist, Pavlos Kollias, Alexander Marshak, Daniel McCoy, Daniel MerkDavid Painemal, John Rausch, Daniel Rosenfeld, Herman Russchenberg, Patric Seifert, Kenneth Sinclair, Philip Stier, Bastiaan van Diedenhoven, Manfred Wendisch, Frank Werner, Robert Wood, Zhibo Zhang, Johannes Quaas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The cloud droplet number concentration (Nd) is of central interest to improve the understanding of cloud physics and for quantifying the effective radiative forcing by aerosol-cloud interactions. Current standard satellite retrievals do not operationally provide Nd, but it can be inferred from retrievals of cloud optical depth (τc) cloud droplet effective radius (re) and cloud top temperature. This review summarizes issues with this approach and quantifies uncertainties. A total relative uncertainty of 78% is inferred for pixel-level retrievals for relatively homogeneous, optically thick and unobscured stratiform clouds with favorable viewing geometry. The uncertainty is even greater if these conditions are not met. For averages over 1° ×1° regions the uncertainty is reduced to 54% assuming random errors for instrument uncertainties. In contrast, the few evaluation studies against reference in situ observations suggest much better accuracy with little variability in the bias. More such studies are required for a better error characterization. Nd uncertainty is dominated by errors in re, and therefore, improvements in re retrievals would greatly improve the quality of the Nd retrievals. Recommendations are made for how this might be achieved. Some existing Nd data sets are compared and discussed, and best practices for the use of Nd data from current passive instruments (e.g., filtering criteria) are recommended. Emerging alternative Nd estimates are also considered. First, new ideas to use additional information from existing and upcoming spaceborne instruments are discussed, and second, approaches using high-quality ground-based observations are examined.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)409-453
Number of pages45
JournalReviews of Geophysics
Volume56
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2018

Fingerprint

droplet
remote sensing
cloud droplet
retrieval
stratiform cloud
volcanic cloud
radiative forcing
optical depth
pixel
cloud physics
physics
geometry
random errors
recommendations
optical thickness
emerging
aerosols
temperature
pixels
radii

Keywords

  • cloud droplet concentrations
  • lidar
  • passive retrievals
  • radar
  • remote sensing
  • satellite

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geophysics

Cite this

Remote Sensing of Droplet Number Concentration in Warm Clouds : A Review of the Current State of Knowledge and Perspectives. / Grosvenor, Daniel P.; Sourdeval, Odran; Zuidema, Paquita; Ackerman, Andrew; Alexandrov, Mikhail D.; Bennartz, Ralf; Boers, Reinout; Cairns, Brian; Chiu, J. Christine; Christensen, Matthew; Deneke, Hartwig; Diamond, Michael; Feingold, Graham; Fridlind, Ann; Hünerbein, Anja; Knist, Christine; Kollias, Pavlos; Marshak, Alexander; McCoy, Daniel; Merk, Daniel; Painemal, David; Rausch, John; Rosenfeld, Daniel; Russchenberg, Herman; Seifert, Patric; Sinclair, Kenneth; Stier, Philip; van Diedenhoven, Bastiaan; Wendisch, Manfred; Werner, Frank; Wood, Robert; Zhang, Zhibo; Quaas, Johannes.

In: Reviews of Geophysics, Vol. 56, No. 2, 01.06.2018, p. 409-453.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Grosvenor, DP, Sourdeval, O, Zuidema, P, Ackerman, A, Alexandrov, MD, Bennartz, R, Boers, R, Cairns, B, Chiu, JC, Christensen, M, Deneke, H, Diamond, M, Feingold, G, Fridlind, A, Hünerbein, A, Knist, C, Kollias, P, Marshak, A, McCoy, D, Merk, D, Painemal, D, Rausch, J, Rosenfeld, D, Russchenberg, H, Seifert, P, Sinclair, K, Stier, P, van Diedenhoven, B, Wendisch, M, Werner, F, Wood, R, Zhang, Z & Quaas, J 2018, 'Remote Sensing of Droplet Number Concentration in Warm Clouds: A Review of the Current State of Knowledge and Perspectives', Reviews of Geophysics, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 409-453. https://doi.org/10.1029/2017RG000593
Grosvenor, Daniel P. ; Sourdeval, Odran ; Zuidema, Paquita ; Ackerman, Andrew ; Alexandrov, Mikhail D. ; Bennartz, Ralf ; Boers, Reinout ; Cairns, Brian ; Chiu, J. Christine ; Christensen, Matthew ; Deneke, Hartwig ; Diamond, Michael ; Feingold, Graham ; Fridlind, Ann ; Hünerbein, Anja ; Knist, Christine ; Kollias, Pavlos ; Marshak, Alexander ; McCoy, Daniel ; Merk, Daniel ; Painemal, David ; Rausch, John ; Rosenfeld, Daniel ; Russchenberg, Herman ; Seifert, Patric ; Sinclair, Kenneth ; Stier, Philip ; van Diedenhoven, Bastiaan ; Wendisch, Manfred ; Werner, Frank ; Wood, Robert ; Zhang, Zhibo ; Quaas, Johannes. / Remote Sensing of Droplet Number Concentration in Warm Clouds : A Review of the Current State of Knowledge and Perspectives. In: Reviews of Geophysics. 2018 ; Vol. 56, No. 2. pp. 409-453.
@article{e6c40f0aef944e559cab855e6c5cdfc2,
title = "Remote Sensing of Droplet Number Concentration in Warm Clouds: A Review of the Current State of Knowledge and Perspectives",
abstract = "The cloud droplet number concentration (Nd) is of central interest to improve the understanding of cloud physics and for quantifying the effective radiative forcing by aerosol-cloud interactions. Current standard satellite retrievals do not operationally provide Nd, but it can be inferred from retrievals of cloud optical depth (τc) cloud droplet effective radius (re) and cloud top temperature. This review summarizes issues with this approach and quantifies uncertainties. A total relative uncertainty of 78{\%} is inferred for pixel-level retrievals for relatively homogeneous, optically thick and unobscured stratiform clouds with favorable viewing geometry. The uncertainty is even greater if these conditions are not met. For averages over 1° ×1° regions the uncertainty is reduced to 54{\%} assuming random errors for instrument uncertainties. In contrast, the few evaluation studies against reference in situ observations suggest much better accuracy with little variability in the bias. More such studies are required for a better error characterization. Nd uncertainty is dominated by errors in re, and therefore, improvements in re retrievals would greatly improve the quality of the Nd retrievals. Recommendations are made for how this might be achieved. Some existing Nd data sets are compared and discussed, and best practices for the use of Nd data from current passive instruments (e.g., filtering criteria) are recommended. Emerging alternative Nd estimates are also considered. First, new ideas to use additional information from existing and upcoming spaceborne instruments are discussed, and second, approaches using high-quality ground-based observations are examined.",
keywords = "cloud droplet concentrations, lidar, passive retrievals, radar, remote sensing, satellite",
author = "Grosvenor, {Daniel P.} and Odran Sourdeval and Paquita Zuidema and Andrew Ackerman and Alexandrov, {Mikhail D.} and Ralf Bennartz and Reinout Boers and Brian Cairns and Chiu, {J. Christine} and Matthew Christensen and Hartwig Deneke and Michael Diamond and Graham Feingold and Ann Fridlind and Anja H{\"u}nerbein and Christine Knist and Pavlos Kollias and Alexander Marshak and Daniel McCoy and Daniel Merk and David Painemal and John Rausch and Daniel Rosenfeld and Herman Russchenberg and Patric Seifert and Kenneth Sinclair and Philip Stier and Bastiaan van Diedenhoven and Manfred Wendisch and Frank Werner and Robert Wood and Zhibo Zhang and Johannes Quaas",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1029/2017RG000593",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "56",
pages = "409--453",
journal = "Reviews of Geophysics",
issn = "8755-1209",
publisher = "American Geophysical Union",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Remote Sensing of Droplet Number Concentration in Warm Clouds

T2 - A Review of the Current State of Knowledge and Perspectives

AU - Grosvenor, Daniel P.

AU - Sourdeval, Odran

AU - Zuidema, Paquita

AU - Ackerman, Andrew

AU - Alexandrov, Mikhail D.

AU - Bennartz, Ralf

AU - Boers, Reinout

AU - Cairns, Brian

AU - Chiu, J. Christine

AU - Christensen, Matthew

AU - Deneke, Hartwig

AU - Diamond, Michael

AU - Feingold, Graham

AU - Fridlind, Ann

AU - Hünerbein, Anja

AU - Knist, Christine

AU - Kollias, Pavlos

AU - Marshak, Alexander

AU - McCoy, Daniel

AU - Merk, Daniel

AU - Painemal, David

AU - Rausch, John

AU - Rosenfeld, Daniel

AU - Russchenberg, Herman

AU - Seifert, Patric

AU - Sinclair, Kenneth

AU - Stier, Philip

AU - van Diedenhoven, Bastiaan

AU - Wendisch, Manfred

AU - Werner, Frank

AU - Wood, Robert

AU - Zhang, Zhibo

AU - Quaas, Johannes

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

N2 - The cloud droplet number concentration (Nd) is of central interest to improve the understanding of cloud physics and for quantifying the effective radiative forcing by aerosol-cloud interactions. Current standard satellite retrievals do not operationally provide Nd, but it can be inferred from retrievals of cloud optical depth (τc) cloud droplet effective radius (re) and cloud top temperature. This review summarizes issues with this approach and quantifies uncertainties. A total relative uncertainty of 78% is inferred for pixel-level retrievals for relatively homogeneous, optically thick and unobscured stratiform clouds with favorable viewing geometry. The uncertainty is even greater if these conditions are not met. For averages over 1° ×1° regions the uncertainty is reduced to 54% assuming random errors for instrument uncertainties. In contrast, the few evaluation studies against reference in situ observations suggest much better accuracy with little variability in the bias. More such studies are required for a better error characterization. Nd uncertainty is dominated by errors in re, and therefore, improvements in re retrievals would greatly improve the quality of the Nd retrievals. Recommendations are made for how this might be achieved. Some existing Nd data sets are compared and discussed, and best practices for the use of Nd data from current passive instruments (e.g., filtering criteria) are recommended. Emerging alternative Nd estimates are also considered. First, new ideas to use additional information from existing and upcoming spaceborne instruments are discussed, and second, approaches using high-quality ground-based observations are examined.

AB - The cloud droplet number concentration (Nd) is of central interest to improve the understanding of cloud physics and for quantifying the effective radiative forcing by aerosol-cloud interactions. Current standard satellite retrievals do not operationally provide Nd, but it can be inferred from retrievals of cloud optical depth (τc) cloud droplet effective radius (re) and cloud top temperature. This review summarizes issues with this approach and quantifies uncertainties. A total relative uncertainty of 78% is inferred for pixel-level retrievals for relatively homogeneous, optically thick and unobscured stratiform clouds with favorable viewing geometry. The uncertainty is even greater if these conditions are not met. For averages over 1° ×1° regions the uncertainty is reduced to 54% assuming random errors for instrument uncertainties. In contrast, the few evaluation studies against reference in situ observations suggest much better accuracy with little variability in the bias. More such studies are required for a better error characterization. Nd uncertainty is dominated by errors in re, and therefore, improvements in re retrievals would greatly improve the quality of the Nd retrievals. Recommendations are made for how this might be achieved. Some existing Nd data sets are compared and discussed, and best practices for the use of Nd data from current passive instruments (e.g., filtering criteria) are recommended. Emerging alternative Nd estimates are also considered. First, new ideas to use additional information from existing and upcoming spaceborne instruments are discussed, and second, approaches using high-quality ground-based observations are examined.

KW - cloud droplet concentrations

KW - lidar

KW - passive retrievals

KW - radar

KW - remote sensing

KW - satellite

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050376815&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85050376815&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1029/2017RG000593

DO - 10.1029/2017RG000593

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85050376815

VL - 56

SP - 409

EP - 453

JO - Reviews of Geophysics

JF - Reviews of Geophysics

SN - 8755-1209

IS - 2

ER -