Religion and spirituality in the face of illness

How cancer, cardiac, and HIV patients describe their spirituality/religiosity

Teresa E. Woods, Gail Ironson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

87 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study reports the results of semi-structured interviews conducted with 60 medically ill (cancer, myocardial infarction, HIV/AIDS) people in an attempt to define what people facing a life-threatening illness mean when they say they are 'spiritual' or 'religious'. Questions were asked about beliefs and affective, behavioral, and somatic realms. Subjects initially self-identified as considering themselves to be spiritual, religious, or both. While some similarities existed between the groups (e.g. amount of time spent in prayer, beliefs set the tone for their life, give them a sense of well-being, guidance, a sense of right and wrong, a connection to God, and a sense they will live on in some form), significant differences were discovered in overall belief systems, as well as in interpretation of the mechanisms whereby subjects' beliefs impacted their health and their recovery. Those identifying as spiritual described recovery and healing as happening through them whereas those identifying as religious were more likely to say it happens to them. In addition, significant differences existed between the groups in their overall view of God, self, world, and others. Implications for future studies are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)393-412
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Health Psychology
Volume4
Issue number3
StatePublished - Jul 1 1999

Fingerprint

Spirituality
Heart Neoplasms
Religion
HIV
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
Myocardial Infarction
Interviews
Health
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Cancer
  • Cardiac
  • Health
  • HIV
  • Religion
  • Spirituality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Religion and spirituality in the face of illness : How cancer, cardiac, and HIV patients describe their spirituality/religiosity. / Woods, Teresa E.; Ironson, Gail.

In: Journal of Health Psychology, Vol. 4, No. 3, 01.07.1999, p. 393-412.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5abd1c519cd840499538af9834b5539c,
title = "Religion and spirituality in the face of illness: How cancer, cardiac, and HIV patients describe their spirituality/religiosity",
abstract = "This study reports the results of semi-structured interviews conducted with 60 medically ill (cancer, myocardial infarction, HIV/AIDS) people in an attempt to define what people facing a life-threatening illness mean when they say they are 'spiritual' or 'religious'. Questions were asked about beliefs and affective, behavioral, and somatic realms. Subjects initially self-identified as considering themselves to be spiritual, religious, or both. While some similarities existed between the groups (e.g. amount of time spent in prayer, beliefs set the tone for their life, give them a sense of well-being, guidance, a sense of right and wrong, a connection to God, and a sense they will live on in some form), significant differences were discovered in overall belief systems, as well as in interpretation of the mechanisms whereby subjects' beliefs impacted their health and their recovery. Those identifying as spiritual described recovery and healing as happening through them whereas those identifying as religious were more likely to say it happens to them. In addition, significant differences existed between the groups in their overall view of God, self, world, and others. Implications for future studies are discussed.",
keywords = "Cancer, Cardiac, Health, HIV, Religion, Spirituality",
author = "Woods, {Teresa E.} and Gail Ironson",
year = "1999",
month = "7",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "393--412",
journal = "Journal of Health Psychology",
issn = "1359-1053",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Religion and spirituality in the face of illness

T2 - How cancer, cardiac, and HIV patients describe their spirituality/religiosity

AU - Woods, Teresa E.

AU - Ironson, Gail

PY - 1999/7/1

Y1 - 1999/7/1

N2 - This study reports the results of semi-structured interviews conducted with 60 medically ill (cancer, myocardial infarction, HIV/AIDS) people in an attempt to define what people facing a life-threatening illness mean when they say they are 'spiritual' or 'religious'. Questions were asked about beliefs and affective, behavioral, and somatic realms. Subjects initially self-identified as considering themselves to be spiritual, religious, or both. While some similarities existed between the groups (e.g. amount of time spent in prayer, beliefs set the tone for their life, give them a sense of well-being, guidance, a sense of right and wrong, a connection to God, and a sense they will live on in some form), significant differences were discovered in overall belief systems, as well as in interpretation of the mechanisms whereby subjects' beliefs impacted their health and their recovery. Those identifying as spiritual described recovery and healing as happening through them whereas those identifying as religious were more likely to say it happens to them. In addition, significant differences existed between the groups in their overall view of God, self, world, and others. Implications for future studies are discussed.

AB - This study reports the results of semi-structured interviews conducted with 60 medically ill (cancer, myocardial infarction, HIV/AIDS) people in an attempt to define what people facing a life-threatening illness mean when they say they are 'spiritual' or 'religious'. Questions were asked about beliefs and affective, behavioral, and somatic realms. Subjects initially self-identified as considering themselves to be spiritual, religious, or both. While some similarities existed between the groups (e.g. amount of time spent in prayer, beliefs set the tone for their life, give them a sense of well-being, guidance, a sense of right and wrong, a connection to God, and a sense they will live on in some form), significant differences were discovered in overall belief systems, as well as in interpretation of the mechanisms whereby subjects' beliefs impacted their health and their recovery. Those identifying as spiritual described recovery and healing as happening through them whereas those identifying as religious were more likely to say it happens to them. In addition, significant differences existed between the groups in their overall view of God, self, world, and others. Implications for future studies are discussed.

KW - Cancer

KW - Cardiac

KW - Health

KW - HIV

KW - Religion

KW - Spirituality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032769710&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032769710&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 393

EP - 412

JO - Journal of Health Psychology

JF - Journal of Health Psychology

SN - 1359-1053

IS - 3

ER -