Reliability of 24-Hour Dietary Recalls as a Measure of Diet in African-American Youth

Sara StGeorge, M. Lee Van Horn, Hannah G. Lawman, Dawn K. Wilson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Although it is a common practice to estimate dietary intake using three random 24-hour dietary recalls, some studies have suggested up to nine may be necessary to reliably estimate usual intake in youth. Given the resulting increase in resources and participant burden, more research is needed to determine whether this method is reliable, particularly in African-American youth at increased risk for obesity and other chronic diseases. Objective This study estimated the reliability with which 24-hour dietary recalls measure energy, fat, fruit, and vegetable intake in African-American youth and examined how reliability changes as a function of the number of recalls. Design This study used cross-sectional data collection across three studies. Participants/setting Participants were African-American youth (n=456, mean±standard deviation age 13.28±1.86 years, 64% were girls, mean±standard deviation body mass index [calculated as kg/m2] 31.45±7.94) who completed random 24-hour dietary recalls (67% completed three) conducted by research assistants using the Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour recall system (n=258) or registered dietitian nutritionists using the Nutrition Data System for Research (n=198). Main outcome measures/statistical analyses Estimates provided by multilevel models were used to calculate the proportion of variance accounted for between individuals and the reliability of means within individuals as a function of the number of recalls. Results Reliability estimates for assessing dietary outcomes using one to three recalls ranged from 11% to 62%. To achieve 80% reliability, the following number of recalls would need to be conducted: 8 for energy intake, 13 for fat intake, 21 to 32 for fruit intake, and 21 to 25 for vegetable intake. Conclusions The common practice of assessing dietary intake with three recalls does so with low reliability in African-American youth. Until more objective methods for reliably estimating usual intake are developed, researchers who choose to use 24-hour dietary recalls are encouraged to include estimates of the measure's reliability in a priori power calculations for improved decision making regarding the number of observations and/or sample size.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1551-1559
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
Volume116
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

diet recall
African Americans
Diet
diet
Nutritionists
Vegetables
Fruit
vegetable consumption
fruit consumption
Fats
fat intake
Research
food intake
energy intake
Energy Intake
Information Systems
Reproducibility of Results
Sample Size
Decision Making
nutritionists

Keywords

  • 24-Hour dietary recall
  • African American
  • Reliability
  • Youth

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Food Science
  • Nutrition and Dietetics

Cite this

Reliability of 24-Hour Dietary Recalls as a Measure of Diet in African-American Youth. / StGeorge, Sara; Van Horn, M. Lee; Lawman, Hannah G.; Wilson, Dawn K.

In: Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, Vol. 116, No. 10, 01.10.2016, p. 1551-1559.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

StGeorge, Sara ; Van Horn, M. Lee ; Lawman, Hannah G. ; Wilson, Dawn K. / Reliability of 24-Hour Dietary Recalls as a Measure of Diet in African-American Youth. In: Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. 2016 ; Vol. 116, No. 10. pp. 1551-1559.
@article{97e2cec91a6c43c3ae7faddadfdd322d,
title = "Reliability of 24-Hour Dietary Recalls as a Measure of Diet in African-American Youth",
abstract = "Background Although it is a common practice to estimate dietary intake using three random 24-hour dietary recalls, some studies have suggested up to nine may be necessary to reliably estimate usual intake in youth. Given the resulting increase in resources and participant burden, more research is needed to determine whether this method is reliable, particularly in African-American youth at increased risk for obesity and other chronic diseases. Objective This study estimated the reliability with which 24-hour dietary recalls measure energy, fat, fruit, and vegetable intake in African-American youth and examined how reliability changes as a function of the number of recalls. Design This study used cross-sectional data collection across three studies. Participants/setting Participants were African-American youth (n=456, mean±standard deviation age 13.28±1.86 years, 64{\%} were girls, mean±standard deviation body mass index [calculated as kg/m2] 31.45±7.94) who completed random 24-hour dietary recalls (67{\%} completed three) conducted by research assistants using the Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour recall system (n=258) or registered dietitian nutritionists using the Nutrition Data System for Research (n=198). Main outcome measures/statistical analyses Estimates provided by multilevel models were used to calculate the proportion of variance accounted for between individuals and the reliability of means within individuals as a function of the number of recalls. Results Reliability estimates for assessing dietary outcomes using one to three recalls ranged from 11{\%} to 62{\%}. To achieve 80{\%} reliability, the following number of recalls would need to be conducted: 8 for energy intake, 13 for fat intake, 21 to 32 for fruit intake, and 21 to 25 for vegetable intake. Conclusions The common practice of assessing dietary intake with three recalls does so with low reliability in African-American youth. Until more objective methods for reliably estimating usual intake are developed, researchers who choose to use 24-hour dietary recalls are encouraged to include estimates of the measure's reliability in a priori power calculations for improved decision making regarding the number of observations and/or sample size.",
keywords = "24-Hour dietary recall, African American, Reliability, Youth",
author = "Sara StGeorge and {Van Horn}, {M. Lee} and Lawman, {Hannah G.} and Wilson, {Dawn K.}",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jand.2016.05.011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "116",
pages = "1551--1559",
journal = "Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics",
issn = "2212-2672",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reliability of 24-Hour Dietary Recalls as a Measure of Diet in African-American Youth

AU - StGeorge, Sara

AU - Van Horn, M. Lee

AU - Lawman, Hannah G.

AU - Wilson, Dawn K.

PY - 2016/10/1

Y1 - 2016/10/1

N2 - Background Although it is a common practice to estimate dietary intake using three random 24-hour dietary recalls, some studies have suggested up to nine may be necessary to reliably estimate usual intake in youth. Given the resulting increase in resources and participant burden, more research is needed to determine whether this method is reliable, particularly in African-American youth at increased risk for obesity and other chronic diseases. Objective This study estimated the reliability with which 24-hour dietary recalls measure energy, fat, fruit, and vegetable intake in African-American youth and examined how reliability changes as a function of the number of recalls. Design This study used cross-sectional data collection across three studies. Participants/setting Participants were African-American youth (n=456, mean±standard deviation age 13.28±1.86 years, 64% were girls, mean±standard deviation body mass index [calculated as kg/m2] 31.45±7.94) who completed random 24-hour dietary recalls (67% completed three) conducted by research assistants using the Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour recall system (n=258) or registered dietitian nutritionists using the Nutrition Data System for Research (n=198). Main outcome measures/statistical analyses Estimates provided by multilevel models were used to calculate the proportion of variance accounted for between individuals and the reliability of means within individuals as a function of the number of recalls. Results Reliability estimates for assessing dietary outcomes using one to three recalls ranged from 11% to 62%. To achieve 80% reliability, the following number of recalls would need to be conducted: 8 for energy intake, 13 for fat intake, 21 to 32 for fruit intake, and 21 to 25 for vegetable intake. Conclusions The common practice of assessing dietary intake with three recalls does so with low reliability in African-American youth. Until more objective methods for reliably estimating usual intake are developed, researchers who choose to use 24-hour dietary recalls are encouraged to include estimates of the measure's reliability in a priori power calculations for improved decision making regarding the number of observations and/or sample size.

AB - Background Although it is a common practice to estimate dietary intake using three random 24-hour dietary recalls, some studies have suggested up to nine may be necessary to reliably estimate usual intake in youth. Given the resulting increase in resources and participant burden, more research is needed to determine whether this method is reliable, particularly in African-American youth at increased risk for obesity and other chronic diseases. Objective This study estimated the reliability with which 24-hour dietary recalls measure energy, fat, fruit, and vegetable intake in African-American youth and examined how reliability changes as a function of the number of recalls. Design This study used cross-sectional data collection across three studies. Participants/setting Participants were African-American youth (n=456, mean±standard deviation age 13.28±1.86 years, 64% were girls, mean±standard deviation body mass index [calculated as kg/m2] 31.45±7.94) who completed random 24-hour dietary recalls (67% completed three) conducted by research assistants using the Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour recall system (n=258) or registered dietitian nutritionists using the Nutrition Data System for Research (n=198). Main outcome measures/statistical analyses Estimates provided by multilevel models were used to calculate the proportion of variance accounted for between individuals and the reliability of means within individuals as a function of the number of recalls. Results Reliability estimates for assessing dietary outcomes using one to three recalls ranged from 11% to 62%. To achieve 80% reliability, the following number of recalls would need to be conducted: 8 for energy intake, 13 for fat intake, 21 to 32 for fruit intake, and 21 to 25 for vegetable intake. Conclusions The common practice of assessing dietary intake with three recalls does so with low reliability in African-American youth. Until more objective methods for reliably estimating usual intake are developed, researchers who choose to use 24-hour dietary recalls are encouraged to include estimates of the measure's reliability in a priori power calculations for improved decision making regarding the number of observations and/or sample size.

KW - 24-Hour dietary recall

KW - African American

KW - Reliability

KW - Youth

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84979665755&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84979665755&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jand.2016.05.011

DO - 10.1016/j.jand.2016.05.011

M3 - Article

C2 - 27394936

AN - SCOPUS:84979665755

VL - 116

SP - 1551

EP - 1559

JO - Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics

JF - Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics

SN - 2212-2672

IS - 10

ER -