Relationships Between Subordinate Perceptions of Supervisor Influence Tactics and Attributed Bases of Supervisory Power

Timothy R. Hinkin, Chester Schriesheim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

87 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper presents the results of a study investigating relationships between measures of supervisor influence and power, as perceived by subordinates (N = 251). The influence measures were based on the framework of Kipnis, Schmidt, and Wilkinson (1980), while the measures of power used were based on French and Raven's (1959) social bases of power. The results indicated that: (1) there was relatively strong support for most of the Kipnis et al. influence dimensions when viewed from the influence target's perspective, (2) perceptions of leader influence tactic behaviors and attributions of leader power bases are empirically distinct, and (3) several relationships exist between subordinate perceptions of leader influence behaviors and subordinate attributions of leaderpower. However, only one influence tactic, rationality, had both substantial and significant positive relationships with the more positively-viewed bases of power (expert and referent power), emphasizing its importance as a means of influence in organizations. Implications of these findings and future directions for research are briefly discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)221-237
Number of pages17
JournalHuman Relations
Volume43
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1990

Fingerprint

Supervisory personnel
tactics
leader
attribution
Influence tactics
Supervisors
Tactics
rationality
expert

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Strategy and Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

Relationships Between Subordinate Perceptions of Supervisor Influence Tactics and Attributed Bases of Supervisory Power. / Hinkin, Timothy R.; Schriesheim, Chester.

In: Human Relations, Vol. 43, No. 3, 1990, p. 221-237.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c8b27698a9344c2aa3fe7c6487b97b47,
title = "Relationships Between Subordinate Perceptions of Supervisor Influence Tactics and Attributed Bases of Supervisory Power",
abstract = "This paper presents the results of a study investigating relationships between measures of supervisor influence and power, as perceived by subordinates (N = 251). The influence measures were based on the framework of Kipnis, Schmidt, and Wilkinson (1980), while the measures of power used were based on French and Raven's (1959) social bases of power. The results indicated that: (1) there was relatively strong support for most of the Kipnis et al. influence dimensions when viewed from the influence target's perspective, (2) perceptions of leader influence tactic behaviors and attributions of leader power bases are empirically distinct, and (3) several relationships exist between subordinate perceptions of leader influence behaviors and subordinate attributions of leaderpower. However, only one influence tactic, rationality, had both substantial and significant positive relationships with the more positively-viewed bases of power (expert and referent power), emphasizing its importance as a means of influence in organizations. Implications of these findings and future directions for research are briefly discussed.",
author = "Hinkin, {Timothy R.} and Chester Schriesheim",
year = "1990",
doi = "10.1177/001872679004300302",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "221--237",
journal = "Human Relations",
issn = "0018-7267",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Relationships Between Subordinate Perceptions of Supervisor Influence Tactics and Attributed Bases of Supervisory Power

AU - Hinkin, Timothy R.

AU - Schriesheim, Chester

PY - 1990

Y1 - 1990

N2 - This paper presents the results of a study investigating relationships between measures of supervisor influence and power, as perceived by subordinates (N = 251). The influence measures were based on the framework of Kipnis, Schmidt, and Wilkinson (1980), while the measures of power used were based on French and Raven's (1959) social bases of power. The results indicated that: (1) there was relatively strong support for most of the Kipnis et al. influence dimensions when viewed from the influence target's perspective, (2) perceptions of leader influence tactic behaviors and attributions of leader power bases are empirically distinct, and (3) several relationships exist between subordinate perceptions of leader influence behaviors and subordinate attributions of leaderpower. However, only one influence tactic, rationality, had both substantial and significant positive relationships with the more positively-viewed bases of power (expert and referent power), emphasizing its importance as a means of influence in organizations. Implications of these findings and future directions for research are briefly discussed.

AB - This paper presents the results of a study investigating relationships between measures of supervisor influence and power, as perceived by subordinates (N = 251). The influence measures were based on the framework of Kipnis, Schmidt, and Wilkinson (1980), while the measures of power used were based on French and Raven's (1959) social bases of power. The results indicated that: (1) there was relatively strong support for most of the Kipnis et al. influence dimensions when viewed from the influence target's perspective, (2) perceptions of leader influence tactic behaviors and attributions of leader power bases are empirically distinct, and (3) several relationships exist between subordinate perceptions of leader influence behaviors and subordinate attributions of leaderpower. However, only one influence tactic, rationality, had both substantial and significant positive relationships with the more positively-viewed bases of power (expert and referent power), emphasizing its importance as a means of influence in organizations. Implications of these findings and future directions for research are briefly discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84973703737&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84973703737&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/001872679004300302

DO - 10.1177/001872679004300302

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 221

EP - 237

JO - Human Relations

JF - Human Relations

SN - 0018-7267

IS - 3

ER -