Regressing team performance on collective efficacy: Considerations of temporal proximity and concordance

Nicholas D. Myers; Craig A. Paiement; Deborah L. Feltz

doi:10.1080/10913670709337009

Regressing team performance on collective efficacy: Considerations of temporal proximity and concordance

Nicholas D. Myers, Craig A. Paiement, Deborah L. Feltz

Education and Psychological Studies

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

20 Scopus citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine to what degree collective efficacy judgments based on summative team performance capabilities exhibited different levels of prediction for three additive intervals of team performance in women's ice hockey. Collective efficacy beliefs of 12 teams were assessed prior to Friday's game and Saturday's game for at least 7 weekends. Questionnaires were completed within 24 hr before each game. Performance indicators were obtained from www.college-hockeystats.com. Data were split into two clusters, Study 1 and Study 2, and were subjected to multilevel modeling. Collective efficacy based on summative team performance capabilities was a statistically significant predictor of team performance at each of the three additive team performance intervals in both Study 1 and Study 2. The magnitude of this relationship did not change significantly as the temporal proximity between the efficacy and performance measures decreased, or, as the concordance (to be defined in the Introduction section) of the two measures increased.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	1-24
Number of pages	24
Journal	Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science
Volume	11
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/10913670709337009
State	Published - 2007

Keywords

Multilevel modeling
Rasch model
Women's ice hockey

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Rehabilitation

Access to Document

10.1080/10913670709337009

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Regressing team performance on collective efficacy: Considerations of temporal proximity and concordance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@article{b12df4a44c22404fb20ee74e708d4eba,

title = "Regressing team performance on collective efficacy: Considerations of temporal proximity and concordance",

abstract = "The purpose of this study was to determine to what degree collective efficacy judgments based on summative team performance capabilities exhibited different levels of prediction for three additive intervals of team performance in women's ice hockey. Collective efficacy beliefs of 12 teams were assessed prior to Friday's game and Saturday's game for at least 7 weekends. Questionnaires were completed within 24 hr before each game. Performance indicators were obtained from www.college-hockeystats.com. Data were split into two clusters, Study 1 and Study 2, and were subjected to multilevel modeling. Collective efficacy based on summative team performance capabilities was a statistically significant predictor of team performance at each of the three additive team performance intervals in both Study 1 and Study 2. The magnitude of this relationship did not change significantly as the temporal proximity between the efficacy and performance measures decreased, or, as the concordance (to be defined in the Introduction section) of the two measures increased.",

keywords = "Multilevel modeling, Rasch model, Women's ice hockey",

author = "Myers, {Nicholas D.} and Paiement, {Craig A.} and Feltz, {Deborah L.}",

note = "Funding Information: This research was supported in part by a grant from Michigan State University, College of Education In-house Grant Program. Another article (Myers, Payment, et al., 2004) was based on a data set that was similar to the one that this article was based on. In consultation with the editor from the journal where the previous article was published, we believe that this article provides a unique contribution and does not provide sufficiently duplicative information. We acknowledge Ahnalee Brincks for editing this article. Copyright: Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.",

year = "2007",

doi = "10.1080/10913670709337009",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "11",

pages = "1--24",

journal = "Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science",

issn = "1091-367X",

publisher = "Routledge",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Regressing team performance on collective efficacy

T2 - Considerations of temporal proximity and concordance

AU - Myers, Nicholas D.

AU - Paiement, Craig A.

AU - Feltz, Deborah L.

N1 - Funding Information: This research was supported in part by a grant from Michigan State University, College of Education In-house Grant Program. Another article (Myers, Payment, et al., 2004) was based on a data set that was similar to the one that this article was based on. In consultation with the editor from the journal where the previous article was published, we believe that this article provides a unique contribution and does not provide sufficiently duplicative information. We acknowledge Ahnalee Brincks for editing this article. Copyright: Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - The purpose of this study was to determine to what degree collective efficacy judgments based on summative team performance capabilities exhibited different levels of prediction for three additive intervals of team performance in women's ice hockey. Collective efficacy beliefs of 12 teams were assessed prior to Friday's game and Saturday's game for at least 7 weekends. Questionnaires were completed within 24 hr before each game. Performance indicators were obtained from www.college-hockeystats.com. Data were split into two clusters, Study 1 and Study 2, and were subjected to multilevel modeling. Collective efficacy based on summative team performance capabilities was a statistically significant predictor of team performance at each of the three additive team performance intervals in both Study 1 and Study 2. The magnitude of this relationship did not change significantly as the temporal proximity between the efficacy and performance measures decreased, or, as the concordance (to be defined in the Introduction section) of the two measures increased.

AB - The purpose of this study was to determine to what degree collective efficacy judgments based on summative team performance capabilities exhibited different levels of prediction for three additive intervals of team performance in women's ice hockey. Collective efficacy beliefs of 12 teams were assessed prior to Friday's game and Saturday's game for at least 7 weekends. Questionnaires were completed within 24 hr before each game. Performance indicators were obtained from www.college-hockeystats.com. Data were split into two clusters, Study 1 and Study 2, and were subjected to multilevel modeling. Collective efficacy based on summative team performance capabilities was a statistically significant predictor of team performance at each of the three additive team performance intervals in both Study 1 and Study 2. The magnitude of this relationship did not change significantly as the temporal proximity between the efficacy and performance measures decreased, or, as the concordance (to be defined in the Introduction section) of the two measures increased.

KW - Multilevel modeling

KW - Rasch model

KW - Women's ice hockey

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33947106058&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33947106058&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10913670709337009

DO - 10.1080/10913670709337009

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33947106058

VL - 11

SP - 1

EP - 24

JO - Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science

JF - Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science

SN - 1091-367X

IS - 1

ER -

Regressing team performance on collective efficacy: Considerations of temporal proximity and concordance

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this