Refractive outcomes after silicone oil removal and intraocular lens implantation

Kevin K. Suk, William E Smiddy, Wei Shi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) calculations in eyes undergoing silicone oil removal and IOL implantation using ultrasound biometry and partial coherence interferometry (PCI) (IOLMaster). METHODS:: This was a retrospective consecutive series of eyes that underwent silicone oil removal and IOL implantation from 1999 to 2009. Data were collected on preoperative and intraoperative characteristics that could affect the refractive outcome. The predicted refraction, as measured with ultrasound biometry or PCI, was compared with the postoperative refraction. RESULTS:: Overall, the mean difference between observed and predicted refraction was -0.97 diopters (D). Thirty-five of 64 eyes (55%) were measured by ultrasound biometry, and 29 of 64 eyes (45%) were measured by PCI. The mean (SD) difference between the predicted refraction and the observed spherical equivalent was -1.34 D (2.18 D) when measured by biometry and -0.51 D (2.03 D) when measured by PCI (P = 0.13). CONCLUSION:: Refractive outcomes after silicone oil removal and secondary IOL implantation are fairly accurate, with most ending up slightly myopic. Measurement by PCI may be more accurate than biometry. The IOL power should be selected to yield a target refraction about 0.5 D to 1.25 D more hyperopic than desired, depending on the method used to measure it.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)634-641
Number of pages8
JournalRetina
Volume33
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2013

Fingerprint

Interferometry
Biometry
Silicone Oils
Intraocular Lens Implantation
Intraocular Lenses

Keywords

  • accuracy
  • biometry
  • intraocular lens
  • intraocular lens implantation
  • IOLMaster
  • partial coherence interferometry
  • refractive outcome
  • silicone oil removal
  • ultrasound

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Refractive outcomes after silicone oil removal and intraocular lens implantation. / Suk, Kevin K.; Smiddy, William E; Shi, Wei.

In: Retina, Vol. 33, No. 3, 01.03.2013, p. 634-641.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Suk, Kevin K. ; Smiddy, William E ; Shi, Wei. / Refractive outcomes after silicone oil removal and intraocular lens implantation. In: Retina. 2013 ; Vol. 33, No. 3. pp. 634-641.
@article{e6f507ff53d9438688bf5cae33e2632b,
title = "Refractive outcomes after silicone oil removal and intraocular lens implantation",
abstract = "Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) calculations in eyes undergoing silicone oil removal and IOL implantation using ultrasound biometry and partial coherence interferometry (PCI) (IOLMaster). METHODS:: This was a retrospective consecutive series of eyes that underwent silicone oil removal and IOL implantation from 1999 to 2009. Data were collected on preoperative and intraoperative characteristics that could affect the refractive outcome. The predicted refraction, as measured with ultrasound biometry or PCI, was compared with the postoperative refraction. RESULTS:: Overall, the mean difference between observed and predicted refraction was -0.97 diopters (D). Thirty-five of 64 eyes (55{\%}) were measured by ultrasound biometry, and 29 of 64 eyes (45{\%}) were measured by PCI. The mean (SD) difference between the predicted refraction and the observed spherical equivalent was -1.34 D (2.18 D) when measured by biometry and -0.51 D (2.03 D) when measured by PCI (P = 0.13). CONCLUSION:: Refractive outcomes after silicone oil removal and secondary IOL implantation are fairly accurate, with most ending up slightly myopic. Measurement by PCI may be more accurate than biometry. The IOL power should be selected to yield a target refraction about 0.5 D to 1.25 D more hyperopic than desired, depending on the method used to measure it.",
keywords = "accuracy, biometry, intraocular lens, intraocular lens implantation, IOLMaster, partial coherence interferometry, refractive outcome, silicone oil removal, ultrasound",
author = "Suk, {Kevin K.} and Smiddy, {William E} and Wei Shi",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/IAE.0b013e31826d37e4",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "634--641",
journal = "Retina",
issn = "0275-004X",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Refractive outcomes after silicone oil removal and intraocular lens implantation

AU - Suk, Kevin K.

AU - Smiddy, William E

AU - Shi, Wei

PY - 2013/3/1

Y1 - 2013/3/1

N2 - Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) calculations in eyes undergoing silicone oil removal and IOL implantation using ultrasound biometry and partial coherence interferometry (PCI) (IOLMaster). METHODS:: This was a retrospective consecutive series of eyes that underwent silicone oil removal and IOL implantation from 1999 to 2009. Data were collected on preoperative and intraoperative characteristics that could affect the refractive outcome. The predicted refraction, as measured with ultrasound biometry or PCI, was compared with the postoperative refraction. RESULTS:: Overall, the mean difference between observed and predicted refraction was -0.97 diopters (D). Thirty-five of 64 eyes (55%) were measured by ultrasound biometry, and 29 of 64 eyes (45%) were measured by PCI. The mean (SD) difference between the predicted refraction and the observed spherical equivalent was -1.34 D (2.18 D) when measured by biometry and -0.51 D (2.03 D) when measured by PCI (P = 0.13). CONCLUSION:: Refractive outcomes after silicone oil removal and secondary IOL implantation are fairly accurate, with most ending up slightly myopic. Measurement by PCI may be more accurate than biometry. The IOL power should be selected to yield a target refraction about 0.5 D to 1.25 D more hyperopic than desired, depending on the method used to measure it.

AB - Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) calculations in eyes undergoing silicone oil removal and IOL implantation using ultrasound biometry and partial coherence interferometry (PCI) (IOLMaster). METHODS:: This was a retrospective consecutive series of eyes that underwent silicone oil removal and IOL implantation from 1999 to 2009. Data were collected on preoperative and intraoperative characteristics that could affect the refractive outcome. The predicted refraction, as measured with ultrasound biometry or PCI, was compared with the postoperative refraction. RESULTS:: Overall, the mean difference between observed and predicted refraction was -0.97 diopters (D). Thirty-five of 64 eyes (55%) were measured by ultrasound biometry, and 29 of 64 eyes (45%) were measured by PCI. The mean (SD) difference between the predicted refraction and the observed spherical equivalent was -1.34 D (2.18 D) when measured by biometry and -0.51 D (2.03 D) when measured by PCI (P = 0.13). CONCLUSION:: Refractive outcomes after silicone oil removal and secondary IOL implantation are fairly accurate, with most ending up slightly myopic. Measurement by PCI may be more accurate than biometry. The IOL power should be selected to yield a target refraction about 0.5 D to 1.25 D more hyperopic than desired, depending on the method used to measure it.

KW - accuracy

KW - biometry

KW - intraocular lens

KW - intraocular lens implantation

KW - IOLMaster

KW - partial coherence interferometry

KW - refractive outcome

KW - silicone oil removal

KW - ultrasound

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84874950605&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84874950605&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/IAE.0b013e31826d37e4

DO - 10.1097/IAE.0b013e31826d37e4

M3 - Article

C2 - 23190922

AN - SCOPUS:84874950605

VL - 33

SP - 634

EP - 641

JO - Retina

JF - Retina

SN - 0275-004X

IS - 3

ER -