Abstract
Study design: Retrospective chart review. Objective: To identify factors in addition to level of injury (LOI) that may predict ejaculation by penile vibratory stimulation (PVS) in spinal cord injured males. Setting: Major urban medical school and teaching hospital. Materials and methods: Presence of a bulbocavernosus response (BCR) and a hip flexor response (HR) before PVS (n = 123 patients), and somatic responses during PVS (n = 204 trials performed on a subset of 44 patients) were evaluated for their frequency of occurrence on trials with and without ejaculation. Results: Overall ejaculation success rates for cervical, T1-T6, and T7-T12 LOI were 71%, 73%, and 35%, respectively. Eighty per cent of patients who were positive for both BCR and HR ejaculated with PVS, while only 8% of patients who were negative for both BCR and HR ejaculated with PVS. For cervical injuries, BCR and HR were no more predictive of ejaculation by PVS than LOI alone. T1-T6 patients were more likely to ejaculate when at least one reflex was present. T7-T12 patients with no BCR were unlikely to ejaculate by PVS. Except for abdominal contractions, somatic responses were not present in the majority of PVS trials. When they were present, however, they occurred in a high percentage of ejaculation trials: withdrawal response (hip flexion, knee flexion and thigh adduction) (90%), piloerection (84%), extremity spasms (83%), thigh abduction (80%), and thigh adduction (72%). Conclusion: We recommend that patients with cervical injuries initially undergo PVS. Patients with T1-T6 LOI with at least one reflex present, and patients with T7-T12 LOI with both reflexes, or only BCR present, may undergo PVS. Certain somatic/autonomic responses, when seen, may help in deciding whether to continue with a given trial, or give a repeat trial, of PVS. Sponsorship: The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis and the State of Florida Specific Appropriations.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 514-519 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Spinal Cord |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue number | 10 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Oct 30 2001 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- Ejaculation
- Infertility
- Paraplegia
- Sperm
- Spinal cord injuries
- Vibrator
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Clinical Neurology
Cite this
Reflexes and somatic responses as predictors of ejaculation by penile vibratory stimulation in men with spinal cord injury. / Bird, V. G.; Brackett, Nancy; Lynne, Charles M; Aballa, T. C.; Ferrell, S. M.
In: Spinal Cord, Vol. 39, No. 10, 30.10.2001, p. 514-519.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Reflexes and somatic responses as predictors of ejaculation by penile vibratory stimulation in men with spinal cord injury
AU - Bird, V. G.
AU - Brackett, Nancy
AU - Lynne, Charles M
AU - Aballa, T. C.
AU - Ferrell, S. M.
PY - 2001/10/30
Y1 - 2001/10/30
N2 - Study design: Retrospective chart review. Objective: To identify factors in addition to level of injury (LOI) that may predict ejaculation by penile vibratory stimulation (PVS) in spinal cord injured males. Setting: Major urban medical school and teaching hospital. Materials and methods: Presence of a bulbocavernosus response (BCR) and a hip flexor response (HR) before PVS (n = 123 patients), and somatic responses during PVS (n = 204 trials performed on a subset of 44 patients) were evaluated for their frequency of occurrence on trials with and without ejaculation. Results: Overall ejaculation success rates for cervical, T1-T6, and T7-T12 LOI were 71%, 73%, and 35%, respectively. Eighty per cent of patients who were positive for both BCR and HR ejaculated with PVS, while only 8% of patients who were negative for both BCR and HR ejaculated with PVS. For cervical injuries, BCR and HR were no more predictive of ejaculation by PVS than LOI alone. T1-T6 patients were more likely to ejaculate when at least one reflex was present. T7-T12 patients with no BCR were unlikely to ejaculate by PVS. Except for abdominal contractions, somatic responses were not present in the majority of PVS trials. When they were present, however, they occurred in a high percentage of ejaculation trials: withdrawal response (hip flexion, knee flexion and thigh adduction) (90%), piloerection (84%), extremity spasms (83%), thigh abduction (80%), and thigh adduction (72%). Conclusion: We recommend that patients with cervical injuries initially undergo PVS. Patients with T1-T6 LOI with at least one reflex present, and patients with T7-T12 LOI with both reflexes, or only BCR present, may undergo PVS. Certain somatic/autonomic responses, when seen, may help in deciding whether to continue with a given trial, or give a repeat trial, of PVS. Sponsorship: The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis and the State of Florida Specific Appropriations.
AB - Study design: Retrospective chart review. Objective: To identify factors in addition to level of injury (LOI) that may predict ejaculation by penile vibratory stimulation (PVS) in spinal cord injured males. Setting: Major urban medical school and teaching hospital. Materials and methods: Presence of a bulbocavernosus response (BCR) and a hip flexor response (HR) before PVS (n = 123 patients), and somatic responses during PVS (n = 204 trials performed on a subset of 44 patients) were evaluated for their frequency of occurrence on trials with and without ejaculation. Results: Overall ejaculation success rates for cervical, T1-T6, and T7-T12 LOI were 71%, 73%, and 35%, respectively. Eighty per cent of patients who were positive for both BCR and HR ejaculated with PVS, while only 8% of patients who were negative for both BCR and HR ejaculated with PVS. For cervical injuries, BCR and HR were no more predictive of ejaculation by PVS than LOI alone. T1-T6 patients were more likely to ejaculate when at least one reflex was present. T7-T12 patients with no BCR were unlikely to ejaculate by PVS. Except for abdominal contractions, somatic responses were not present in the majority of PVS trials. When they were present, however, they occurred in a high percentage of ejaculation trials: withdrawal response (hip flexion, knee flexion and thigh adduction) (90%), piloerection (84%), extremity spasms (83%), thigh abduction (80%), and thigh adduction (72%). Conclusion: We recommend that patients with cervical injuries initially undergo PVS. Patients with T1-T6 LOI with at least one reflex present, and patients with T7-T12 LOI with both reflexes, or only BCR present, may undergo PVS. Certain somatic/autonomic responses, when seen, may help in deciding whether to continue with a given trial, or give a repeat trial, of PVS. Sponsorship: The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis and the State of Florida Specific Appropriations.
KW - Ejaculation
KW - Infertility
KW - Paraplegia
KW - Sperm
KW - Spinal cord injuries
KW - Vibrator
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034775079&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034775079&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/sj.sc.3101200
DO - 10.1038/sj.sc.3101200
M3 - Article
C2 - 11641794
AN - SCOPUS:0034775079
VL - 39
SP - 514
EP - 519
JO - Spinal Cord
JF - Spinal Cord
SN - 1362-4393
IS - 10
ER -