Reflexes and somatic responses as predictors of ejaculation by penile vibratory stimulation in men with spinal cord injury

V. G. Bird, Nancy Brackett, Charles M Lynne, T. C. Aballa, S. M. Ferrell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective chart review. Objective: To identify factors in addition to level of injury (LOI) that may predict ejaculation by penile vibratory stimulation (PVS) in spinal cord injured males. Setting: Major urban medical school and teaching hospital. Materials and methods: Presence of a bulbocavernosus response (BCR) and a hip flexor response (HR) before PVS (n = 123 patients), and somatic responses during PVS (n = 204 trials performed on a subset of 44 patients) were evaluated for their frequency of occurrence on trials with and without ejaculation. Results: Overall ejaculation success rates for cervical, T1-T6, and T7-T12 LOI were 71%, 73%, and 35%, respectively. Eighty per cent of patients who were positive for both BCR and HR ejaculated with PVS, while only 8% of patients who were negative for both BCR and HR ejaculated with PVS. For cervical injuries, BCR and HR were no more predictive of ejaculation by PVS than LOI alone. T1-T6 patients were more likely to ejaculate when at least one reflex was present. T7-T12 patients with no BCR were unlikely to ejaculate by PVS. Except for abdominal contractions, somatic responses were not present in the majority of PVS trials. When they were present, however, they occurred in a high percentage of ejaculation trials: withdrawal response (hip flexion, knee flexion and thigh adduction) (90%), piloerection (84%), extremity spasms (83%), thigh abduction (80%), and thigh adduction (72%). Conclusion: We recommend that patients with cervical injuries initially undergo PVS. Patients with T1-T6 LOI with at least one reflex present, and patients with T7-T12 LOI with both reflexes, or only BCR present, may undergo PVS. Certain somatic/autonomic responses, when seen, may help in deciding whether to continue with a given trial, or give a repeat trial, of PVS. Sponsorship: The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis and the State of Florida Specific Appropriations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)514-519
Number of pages6
JournalSpinal Cord
Volume39
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 30 2001

Fingerprint

Ejaculation
Spinal Cord Injuries
Reflex
Hip
Wounds and Injuries
Thigh
Piloerection
Spinal Cord Stimulation
Spasm
Medical Schools
Teaching Hospitals
Paralysis
Knee
Extremities
Retrospective Studies

Keywords

  • Ejaculation
  • Infertility
  • Paraplegia
  • Sperm
  • Spinal cord injuries
  • Vibrator

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Reflexes and somatic responses as predictors of ejaculation by penile vibratory stimulation in men with spinal cord injury. / Bird, V. G.; Brackett, Nancy; Lynne, Charles M; Aballa, T. C.; Ferrell, S. M.

In: Spinal Cord, Vol. 39, No. 10, 30.10.2001, p. 514-519.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bird, V. G. ; Brackett, Nancy ; Lynne, Charles M ; Aballa, T. C. ; Ferrell, S. M. / Reflexes and somatic responses as predictors of ejaculation by penile vibratory stimulation in men with spinal cord injury. In: Spinal Cord. 2001 ; Vol. 39, No. 10. pp. 514-519.
@article{094cfad979934095821a5887064de29b,
title = "Reflexes and somatic responses as predictors of ejaculation by penile vibratory stimulation in men with spinal cord injury",
abstract = "Study design: Retrospective chart review. Objective: To identify factors in addition to level of injury (LOI) that may predict ejaculation by penile vibratory stimulation (PVS) in spinal cord injured males. Setting: Major urban medical school and teaching hospital. Materials and methods: Presence of a bulbocavernosus response (BCR) and a hip flexor response (HR) before PVS (n = 123 patients), and somatic responses during PVS (n = 204 trials performed on a subset of 44 patients) were evaluated for their frequency of occurrence on trials with and without ejaculation. Results: Overall ejaculation success rates for cervical, T1-T6, and T7-T12 LOI were 71{\%}, 73{\%}, and 35{\%}, respectively. Eighty per cent of patients who were positive for both BCR and HR ejaculated with PVS, while only 8{\%} of patients who were negative for both BCR and HR ejaculated with PVS. For cervical injuries, BCR and HR were no more predictive of ejaculation by PVS than LOI alone. T1-T6 patients were more likely to ejaculate when at least one reflex was present. T7-T12 patients with no BCR were unlikely to ejaculate by PVS. Except for abdominal contractions, somatic responses were not present in the majority of PVS trials. When they were present, however, they occurred in a high percentage of ejaculation trials: withdrawal response (hip flexion, knee flexion and thigh adduction) (90{\%}), piloerection (84{\%}), extremity spasms (83{\%}), thigh abduction (80{\%}), and thigh adduction (72{\%}). Conclusion: We recommend that patients with cervical injuries initially undergo PVS. Patients with T1-T6 LOI with at least one reflex present, and patients with T7-T12 LOI with both reflexes, or only BCR present, may undergo PVS. Certain somatic/autonomic responses, when seen, may help in deciding whether to continue with a given trial, or give a repeat trial, of PVS. Sponsorship: The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis and the State of Florida Specific Appropriations.",
keywords = "Ejaculation, Infertility, Paraplegia, Sperm, Spinal cord injuries, Vibrator",
author = "Bird, {V. G.} and Nancy Brackett and Lynne, {Charles M} and Aballa, {T. C.} and Ferrell, {S. M.}",
year = "2001",
month = "10",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1038/sj.sc.3101200",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "514--519",
journal = "Spinal Cord",
issn = "1362-4393",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reflexes and somatic responses as predictors of ejaculation by penile vibratory stimulation in men with spinal cord injury

AU - Bird, V. G.

AU - Brackett, Nancy

AU - Lynne, Charles M

AU - Aballa, T. C.

AU - Ferrell, S. M.

PY - 2001/10/30

Y1 - 2001/10/30

N2 - Study design: Retrospective chart review. Objective: To identify factors in addition to level of injury (LOI) that may predict ejaculation by penile vibratory stimulation (PVS) in spinal cord injured males. Setting: Major urban medical school and teaching hospital. Materials and methods: Presence of a bulbocavernosus response (BCR) and a hip flexor response (HR) before PVS (n = 123 patients), and somatic responses during PVS (n = 204 trials performed on a subset of 44 patients) were evaluated for their frequency of occurrence on trials with and without ejaculation. Results: Overall ejaculation success rates for cervical, T1-T6, and T7-T12 LOI were 71%, 73%, and 35%, respectively. Eighty per cent of patients who were positive for both BCR and HR ejaculated with PVS, while only 8% of patients who were negative for both BCR and HR ejaculated with PVS. For cervical injuries, BCR and HR were no more predictive of ejaculation by PVS than LOI alone. T1-T6 patients were more likely to ejaculate when at least one reflex was present. T7-T12 patients with no BCR were unlikely to ejaculate by PVS. Except for abdominal contractions, somatic responses were not present in the majority of PVS trials. When they were present, however, they occurred in a high percentage of ejaculation trials: withdrawal response (hip flexion, knee flexion and thigh adduction) (90%), piloerection (84%), extremity spasms (83%), thigh abduction (80%), and thigh adduction (72%). Conclusion: We recommend that patients with cervical injuries initially undergo PVS. Patients with T1-T6 LOI with at least one reflex present, and patients with T7-T12 LOI with both reflexes, or only BCR present, may undergo PVS. Certain somatic/autonomic responses, when seen, may help in deciding whether to continue with a given trial, or give a repeat trial, of PVS. Sponsorship: The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis and the State of Florida Specific Appropriations.

AB - Study design: Retrospective chart review. Objective: To identify factors in addition to level of injury (LOI) that may predict ejaculation by penile vibratory stimulation (PVS) in spinal cord injured males. Setting: Major urban medical school and teaching hospital. Materials and methods: Presence of a bulbocavernosus response (BCR) and a hip flexor response (HR) before PVS (n = 123 patients), and somatic responses during PVS (n = 204 trials performed on a subset of 44 patients) were evaluated for their frequency of occurrence on trials with and without ejaculation. Results: Overall ejaculation success rates for cervical, T1-T6, and T7-T12 LOI were 71%, 73%, and 35%, respectively. Eighty per cent of patients who were positive for both BCR and HR ejaculated with PVS, while only 8% of patients who were negative for both BCR and HR ejaculated with PVS. For cervical injuries, BCR and HR were no more predictive of ejaculation by PVS than LOI alone. T1-T6 patients were more likely to ejaculate when at least one reflex was present. T7-T12 patients with no BCR were unlikely to ejaculate by PVS. Except for abdominal contractions, somatic responses were not present in the majority of PVS trials. When they were present, however, they occurred in a high percentage of ejaculation trials: withdrawal response (hip flexion, knee flexion and thigh adduction) (90%), piloerection (84%), extremity spasms (83%), thigh abduction (80%), and thigh adduction (72%). Conclusion: We recommend that patients with cervical injuries initially undergo PVS. Patients with T1-T6 LOI with at least one reflex present, and patients with T7-T12 LOI with both reflexes, or only BCR present, may undergo PVS. Certain somatic/autonomic responses, when seen, may help in deciding whether to continue with a given trial, or give a repeat trial, of PVS. Sponsorship: The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis and the State of Florida Specific Appropriations.

KW - Ejaculation

KW - Infertility

KW - Paraplegia

KW - Sperm

KW - Spinal cord injuries

KW - Vibrator

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034775079&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034775079&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/sj.sc.3101200

DO - 10.1038/sj.sc.3101200

M3 - Article

C2 - 11641794

AN - SCOPUS:0034775079

VL - 39

SP - 514

EP - 519

JO - Spinal Cord

JF - Spinal Cord

SN - 1362-4393

IS - 10

ER -