Reference data for commonly used sensory and motor nerve conduction studies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: The goal of this study was to generate reference data for a wide range of sensory and motor nerve conduction studies (NCSs) that are commonly used in routine electrodiagnostic practice. Methods: NCS data were collected from control subjects with a normal neurological examination and no known risk factors for or symptoms to suggest disease of the peripheral nervous system. Thirteen sensory and motor nerves were studied in the upper and lower limbs using standard recording techniques. Quantile regression was used to obtain estimates of the lower (e.g., 5th) percentiles for sensory and motor amplitudes and conduction velocities, as well as estimates of the upper (e.g., 95th) percentiles for distal motor latency and F-wave latencies. Results: Reference data for sensory and motor amplitudes required adjustment for age; F-wave latencies required adjustment for gender. Covariate adjustments were not required for other reference data. Data from N = 100 and N = 190 subjects permitted estimation of as low as the 4th and 2nd percentile, respectively, but further increases to N = 296 did not permit estimation of a more extreme percentile. Discussion: Efforts to develop reference data require careful selection of study subjects; sufficient sample size; adjustment for relevant covariates; and appropriate statistical methods for analysis. Reference data that cannot be estimated reliably due to absent potentials or data variability must be interpreted with caution. We present data for a range of clinically applicable reference percentiles, but judgment regarding which is most appropriate for diagnostic purpose awaits empiric evaluation in a disease population.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)772-794
Number of pages23
JournalMuscle and Nerve
Volume40
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Neural Conduction
Social Adjustment
Neurologic Examination
Peripheral Nervous System Diseases
Sample Size
Patient Selection
Lower Extremity
Population

Keywords

  • Electrodiagnosis
  • Neurophysiology
  • Normative data
  • Quantile regression
  • Reference data

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Physiology (medical)
  • Physiology

Cite this

Reference data for commonly used sensory and motor nerve conduction studies. / Benatar, Michael G; Wuu, Joanne; Peng, Limin.

In: Muscle and Nerve, Vol. 40, No. 5, 01.11.2009, p. 772-794.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3ee64230aad34c95b8bace09aab892f9,
title = "Reference data for commonly used sensory and motor nerve conduction studies",
abstract = "Introduction: The goal of this study was to generate reference data for a wide range of sensory and motor nerve conduction studies (NCSs) that are commonly used in routine electrodiagnostic practice. Methods: NCS data were collected from control subjects with a normal neurological examination and no known risk factors for or symptoms to suggest disease of the peripheral nervous system. Thirteen sensory and motor nerves were studied in the upper and lower limbs using standard recording techniques. Quantile regression was used to obtain estimates of the lower (e.g., 5th) percentiles for sensory and motor amplitudes and conduction velocities, as well as estimates of the upper (e.g., 95th) percentiles for distal motor latency and F-wave latencies. Results: Reference data for sensory and motor amplitudes required adjustment for age; F-wave latencies required adjustment for gender. Covariate adjustments were not required for other reference data. Data from N = 100 and N = 190 subjects permitted estimation of as low as the 4th and 2nd percentile, respectively, but further increases to N = 296 did not permit estimation of a more extreme percentile. Discussion: Efforts to develop reference data require careful selection of study subjects; sufficient sample size; adjustment for relevant covariates; and appropriate statistical methods for analysis. Reference data that cannot be estimated reliably due to absent potentials or data variability must be interpreted with caution. We present data for a range of clinically applicable reference percentiles, but judgment regarding which is most appropriate for diagnostic purpose awaits empiric evaluation in a disease population.",
keywords = "Electrodiagnosis, Neurophysiology, Normative data, Quantile regression, Reference data",
author = "Benatar, {Michael G} and Joanne Wuu and Limin Peng",
year = "2009",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/mus.21490",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "772--794",
journal = "Muscle and Nerve",
issn = "0148-639X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reference data for commonly used sensory and motor nerve conduction studies

AU - Benatar, Michael G

AU - Wuu, Joanne

AU - Peng, Limin

PY - 2009/11/1

Y1 - 2009/11/1

N2 - Introduction: The goal of this study was to generate reference data for a wide range of sensory and motor nerve conduction studies (NCSs) that are commonly used in routine electrodiagnostic practice. Methods: NCS data were collected from control subjects with a normal neurological examination and no known risk factors for or symptoms to suggest disease of the peripheral nervous system. Thirteen sensory and motor nerves were studied in the upper and lower limbs using standard recording techniques. Quantile regression was used to obtain estimates of the lower (e.g., 5th) percentiles for sensory and motor amplitudes and conduction velocities, as well as estimates of the upper (e.g., 95th) percentiles for distal motor latency and F-wave latencies. Results: Reference data for sensory and motor amplitudes required adjustment for age; F-wave latencies required adjustment for gender. Covariate adjustments were not required for other reference data. Data from N = 100 and N = 190 subjects permitted estimation of as low as the 4th and 2nd percentile, respectively, but further increases to N = 296 did not permit estimation of a more extreme percentile. Discussion: Efforts to develop reference data require careful selection of study subjects; sufficient sample size; adjustment for relevant covariates; and appropriate statistical methods for analysis. Reference data that cannot be estimated reliably due to absent potentials or data variability must be interpreted with caution. We present data for a range of clinically applicable reference percentiles, but judgment regarding which is most appropriate for diagnostic purpose awaits empiric evaluation in a disease population.

AB - Introduction: The goal of this study was to generate reference data for a wide range of sensory and motor nerve conduction studies (NCSs) that are commonly used in routine electrodiagnostic practice. Methods: NCS data were collected from control subjects with a normal neurological examination and no known risk factors for or symptoms to suggest disease of the peripheral nervous system. Thirteen sensory and motor nerves were studied in the upper and lower limbs using standard recording techniques. Quantile regression was used to obtain estimates of the lower (e.g., 5th) percentiles for sensory and motor amplitudes and conduction velocities, as well as estimates of the upper (e.g., 95th) percentiles for distal motor latency and F-wave latencies. Results: Reference data for sensory and motor amplitudes required adjustment for age; F-wave latencies required adjustment for gender. Covariate adjustments were not required for other reference data. Data from N = 100 and N = 190 subjects permitted estimation of as low as the 4th and 2nd percentile, respectively, but further increases to N = 296 did not permit estimation of a more extreme percentile. Discussion: Efforts to develop reference data require careful selection of study subjects; sufficient sample size; adjustment for relevant covariates; and appropriate statistical methods for analysis. Reference data that cannot be estimated reliably due to absent potentials or data variability must be interpreted with caution. We present data for a range of clinically applicable reference percentiles, but judgment regarding which is most appropriate for diagnostic purpose awaits empiric evaluation in a disease population.

KW - Electrodiagnosis

KW - Neurophysiology

KW - Normative data

KW - Quantile regression

KW - Reference data

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=71549150291&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=71549150291&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/mus.21490

DO - 10.1002/mus.21490

M3 - Article

C2 - 19827092

AN - SCOPUS:71549150291

VL - 40

SP - 772

EP - 794

JO - Muscle and Nerve

JF - Muscle and Nerve

SN - 0148-639X

IS - 5

ER -