Reconstruction of the stenotic hypopharynx and cervical esophagus without total laryngectomy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Reconstruction for severe stenosis of the hypopharynx, laryngeal inlet, and/or cervical esophagus is a challenging problem for the surgeon and his patient who want to avoid total laryngectomy. We reviewed the case records of eight patients and the relevant published literature in an effort to define the requirements for success and the causes of failure. A variety of surgical techniques were used. Seven of 8 patients eat a normal or near normal diet. Two of 4 patients, who sustained laryngeal damage at the time of initial injury, required total laryngectomy because of persistent aspiration. The 2 remaining patients and the 4 patients, who did not sustain laryngeal damage at the time of injury, speak with a good voice. Total laryngectomy should be reserved for those patient who cannot be rehabilitated following optimal reconstruction.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1153-1157
Number of pages5
JournalLaryngoscope
Volume94
Issue number9
StatePublished - Jan 1 1984

Fingerprint

Hypopharynx
Laryngectomy
Esophagus
Laryngostenosis
Wounds and Injuries
Diet

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

@article{228b5a5a47fd4aeeac61ef387b884c3b,
title = "Reconstruction of the stenotic hypopharynx and cervical esophagus without total laryngectomy",
abstract = "Reconstruction for severe stenosis of the hypopharynx, laryngeal inlet, and/or cervical esophagus is a challenging problem for the surgeon and his patient who want to avoid total laryngectomy. We reviewed the case records of eight patients and the relevant published literature in an effort to define the requirements for success and the causes of failure. A variety of surgical techniques were used. Seven of 8 patients eat a normal or near normal diet. Two of 4 patients, who sustained laryngeal damage at the time of initial injury, required total laryngectomy because of persistent aspiration. The 2 remaining patients and the 4 patients, who did not sustain laryngeal damage at the time of injury, speak with a good voice. Total laryngectomy should be reserved for those patient who cannot be rehabilitated following optimal reconstruction.",
author = "Goodwin, {W. Jarrard} and Donna Lundy and Alan Livingstone",
year = "1984",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "94",
pages = "1153--1157",
journal = "Laryngoscope",
issn = "0023-852X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reconstruction of the stenotic hypopharynx and cervical esophagus without total laryngectomy

AU - Goodwin, W. Jarrard

AU - Lundy, Donna

AU - Livingstone, Alan

PY - 1984/1/1

Y1 - 1984/1/1

N2 - Reconstruction for severe stenosis of the hypopharynx, laryngeal inlet, and/or cervical esophagus is a challenging problem for the surgeon and his patient who want to avoid total laryngectomy. We reviewed the case records of eight patients and the relevant published literature in an effort to define the requirements for success and the causes of failure. A variety of surgical techniques were used. Seven of 8 patients eat a normal or near normal diet. Two of 4 patients, who sustained laryngeal damage at the time of initial injury, required total laryngectomy because of persistent aspiration. The 2 remaining patients and the 4 patients, who did not sustain laryngeal damage at the time of injury, speak with a good voice. Total laryngectomy should be reserved for those patient who cannot be rehabilitated following optimal reconstruction.

AB - Reconstruction for severe stenosis of the hypopharynx, laryngeal inlet, and/or cervical esophagus is a challenging problem for the surgeon and his patient who want to avoid total laryngectomy. We reviewed the case records of eight patients and the relevant published literature in an effort to define the requirements for success and the causes of failure. A variety of surgical techniques were used. Seven of 8 patients eat a normal or near normal diet. Two of 4 patients, who sustained laryngeal damage at the time of initial injury, required total laryngectomy because of persistent aspiration. The 2 remaining patients and the 4 patients, who did not sustain laryngeal damage at the time of injury, speak with a good voice. Total laryngectomy should be reserved for those patient who cannot be rehabilitated following optimal reconstruction.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021231902&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021231902&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 6472010

AN - SCOPUS:0021231902

VL - 94

SP - 1153

EP - 1157

JO - Laryngoscope

JF - Laryngoscope

SN - 0023-852X

IS - 9

ER -