Reconstruction of open wounds as a complication of spinal surgery with flaps: A systematic review

Lee Onn Chieng, Zachary Hubbard, Christopher Salgado, Allan D Levi, Harvey Chim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Obje ct A systematic review of the available evidence on the prophylactic and therapeutic use of flaps for the coverage of complex spinal soft-tissue defects was performed to determine if the use of flaps reduces postoperative complications and improves patient outcomes. Met hods A PubMed database search was performed to identify English-language articles published between 1990 and 2014 that contained the following phrases to describe postoperative wounds ("wound," "complex back wound," "postoperative wound," "spine surgery") and intervention ("flap closure," "flap coverage," "soft tissue reconstruction," "muscle flap"). Results In total, 532 articles were reviewed with 17 articles meeting the inclusion criteria of this study. The risk factors from the pooled analysis of 262 patients for the development of postoperative complex back wounds that necessitated muscle flap coverage included the involvement of instrumentation (77.6%), a previous history of radiotherapy (33.2%), smoking (20.6%), and diabetes mellitus (17.2%). In patients with instrumentation, prophylactic coverage of the wound with a well-vascularized flap was shown to result in a lower incidence of wound complications. One study showed a statistically significant decrease in complications compared with patients where prophylactic coverage was not performed (20% vs 45%). The indications for flap coverage after onset of wound complications included hardware exposure, wound infection, dehiscence, seroma, and hematoma. Flap coverage was shown to decrease the number of surgical debridements needed and also salvage hardware, with the rate of hardware removal after flap coverage ranging from 0% to 41.9% in 4 studies. Con clusion s Prophylactic coverage with flaps in high-risk patients undergoing spine surgery reduces complications, while therapeutic coverage following wound complications allows the salvage of hardware in the majority of patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numberE17
JournalNeurosurgical Focus
Volume39
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Wounds and Injuries
Spine
Seroma
Muscles
Therapeutic Uses
Debridement
Wound Infection
PubMed
Hematoma
Statistical Factor Analysis
Diabetes Mellitus
Language
Radiotherapy
Smoking
Databases
Incidence
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Back flaps
  • Complications of spinal surgery
  • Spine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Reconstruction of open wounds as a complication of spinal surgery with flaps : A systematic review. / Chieng, Lee Onn; Hubbard, Zachary; Salgado, Christopher; Levi, Allan D; Chim, Harvey.

In: Neurosurgical Focus, Vol. 39, No. 4, E17, 2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chieng, Lee Onn ; Hubbard, Zachary ; Salgado, Christopher ; Levi, Allan D ; Chim, Harvey. / Reconstruction of open wounds as a complication of spinal surgery with flaps : A systematic review. In: Neurosurgical Focus. 2015 ; Vol. 39, No. 4.
@article{5e099d4b76be4278b3341405ce69f410,
title = "Reconstruction of open wounds as a complication of spinal surgery with flaps: A systematic review",
abstract = "Obje ct A systematic review of the available evidence on the prophylactic and therapeutic use of flaps for the coverage of complex spinal soft-tissue defects was performed to determine if the use of flaps reduces postoperative complications and improves patient outcomes. Met hods A PubMed database search was performed to identify English-language articles published between 1990 and 2014 that contained the following phrases to describe postoperative wounds ({"}wound,{"} {"}complex back wound,{"} {"}postoperative wound,{"} {"}spine surgery{"}) and intervention ({"}flap closure,{"} {"}flap coverage,{"} {"}soft tissue reconstruction,{"} {"}muscle flap{"}). Results In total, 532 articles were reviewed with 17 articles meeting the inclusion criteria of this study. The risk factors from the pooled analysis of 262 patients for the development of postoperative complex back wounds that necessitated muscle flap coverage included the involvement of instrumentation (77.6{\%}), a previous history of radiotherapy (33.2{\%}), smoking (20.6{\%}), and diabetes mellitus (17.2{\%}). In patients with instrumentation, prophylactic coverage of the wound with a well-vascularized flap was shown to result in a lower incidence of wound complications. One study showed a statistically significant decrease in complications compared with patients where prophylactic coverage was not performed (20{\%} vs 45{\%}). The indications for flap coverage after onset of wound complications included hardware exposure, wound infection, dehiscence, seroma, and hematoma. Flap coverage was shown to decrease the number of surgical debridements needed and also salvage hardware, with the rate of hardware removal after flap coverage ranging from 0{\%} to 41.9{\%} in 4 studies. Con clusion s Prophylactic coverage with flaps in high-risk patients undergoing spine surgery reduces complications, while therapeutic coverage following wound complications allows the salvage of hardware in the majority of patients.",
keywords = "Back flaps, Complications of spinal surgery, Spine",
author = "Chieng, {Lee Onn} and Zachary Hubbard and Christopher Salgado and Levi, {Allan D} and Harvey Chim",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.3171/2015.7.FOCUS15245",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
journal = "Neurosurgical Focus",
issn = "1092-0684",
publisher = "American Association of Neurological Surgeons",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reconstruction of open wounds as a complication of spinal surgery with flaps

T2 - A systematic review

AU - Chieng, Lee Onn

AU - Hubbard, Zachary

AU - Salgado, Christopher

AU - Levi, Allan D

AU - Chim, Harvey

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Obje ct A systematic review of the available evidence on the prophylactic and therapeutic use of flaps for the coverage of complex spinal soft-tissue defects was performed to determine if the use of flaps reduces postoperative complications and improves patient outcomes. Met hods A PubMed database search was performed to identify English-language articles published between 1990 and 2014 that contained the following phrases to describe postoperative wounds ("wound," "complex back wound," "postoperative wound," "spine surgery") and intervention ("flap closure," "flap coverage," "soft tissue reconstruction," "muscle flap"). Results In total, 532 articles were reviewed with 17 articles meeting the inclusion criteria of this study. The risk factors from the pooled analysis of 262 patients for the development of postoperative complex back wounds that necessitated muscle flap coverage included the involvement of instrumentation (77.6%), a previous history of radiotherapy (33.2%), smoking (20.6%), and diabetes mellitus (17.2%). In patients with instrumentation, prophylactic coverage of the wound with a well-vascularized flap was shown to result in a lower incidence of wound complications. One study showed a statistically significant decrease in complications compared with patients where prophylactic coverage was not performed (20% vs 45%). The indications for flap coverage after onset of wound complications included hardware exposure, wound infection, dehiscence, seroma, and hematoma. Flap coverage was shown to decrease the number of surgical debridements needed and also salvage hardware, with the rate of hardware removal after flap coverage ranging from 0% to 41.9% in 4 studies. Con clusion s Prophylactic coverage with flaps in high-risk patients undergoing spine surgery reduces complications, while therapeutic coverage following wound complications allows the salvage of hardware in the majority of patients.

AB - Obje ct A systematic review of the available evidence on the prophylactic and therapeutic use of flaps for the coverage of complex spinal soft-tissue defects was performed to determine if the use of flaps reduces postoperative complications and improves patient outcomes. Met hods A PubMed database search was performed to identify English-language articles published between 1990 and 2014 that contained the following phrases to describe postoperative wounds ("wound," "complex back wound," "postoperative wound," "spine surgery") and intervention ("flap closure," "flap coverage," "soft tissue reconstruction," "muscle flap"). Results In total, 532 articles were reviewed with 17 articles meeting the inclusion criteria of this study. The risk factors from the pooled analysis of 262 patients for the development of postoperative complex back wounds that necessitated muscle flap coverage included the involvement of instrumentation (77.6%), a previous history of radiotherapy (33.2%), smoking (20.6%), and diabetes mellitus (17.2%). In patients with instrumentation, prophylactic coverage of the wound with a well-vascularized flap was shown to result in a lower incidence of wound complications. One study showed a statistically significant decrease in complications compared with patients where prophylactic coverage was not performed (20% vs 45%). The indications for flap coverage after onset of wound complications included hardware exposure, wound infection, dehiscence, seroma, and hematoma. Flap coverage was shown to decrease the number of surgical debridements needed and also salvage hardware, with the rate of hardware removal after flap coverage ranging from 0% to 41.9% in 4 studies. Con clusion s Prophylactic coverage with flaps in high-risk patients undergoing spine surgery reduces complications, while therapeutic coverage following wound complications allows the salvage of hardware in the majority of patients.

KW - Back flaps

KW - Complications of spinal surgery

KW - Spine

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947439054&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84947439054&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3171/2015.7.FOCUS15245

DO - 10.3171/2015.7.FOCUS15245

M3 - Article

C2 - 26424341

AN - SCOPUS:84947439054

VL - 39

JO - Neurosurgical Focus

JF - Neurosurgical Focus

SN - 1092-0684

IS - 4

M1 - E17

ER -