Rationality, reasonableness, and critical rationalism: Problems with the pragma-dialectical view

Harvey Siegel, John Biro

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Scopus citations

Abstract

A major virtue of the Pragma-Dialectical theory of argumentation is its commitment to reasonableness and rationality as central criteria of argumentative quality. However, the account of these key notions offered by the originators of this theory, Frans van Eemeren and Rob Grootendorst, seems to us problematic in several respects. In what follows we criticize that account and suggest an alternative, offered elsewhere, that seems to us to be both independently preferable and more in keeping with the epistemic approach to arguments and argumentation we favor.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)191-203
Number of pages13
JournalArgumentation
Volume22
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2008

Keywords

  • Critical rationalism
  • Justification
  • Münchhausen Trilemma
  • Pragma-dialectic
  • Rationality
  • Reasonableness

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy
  • Linguistics and Language

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Rationality, reasonableness, and critical rationalism: Problems with the pragma-dialectical view'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this