Rating scales for dystonia

A multicenter assessment

Cynthia L. Comella, Sue Leurgans, Joanne Wuu, Glenn T. Stebbins T., Teresa Chmura

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

176 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The evaluation of dystonia requires a reliable rating scale. The widely used Fahn-Marsden Scale (F-M) has not been sufficiently tested across multiple centers and investigators. The Dystonia Study Group developed the Unified Dystonia Rating Scale (UDRS) and a Global Dystonia Rating Scale (GDS) to serve as instruments to assess dystonia severity. In this study, 25 dystonia experts evaluated the UDRS, F-M, and GDS for internal consistency and reliability. One hundred dystonia patients were videotaped using a standardized videotape protocol. Each examiner rated 20 patients using the UDRS, F-M, and GDS in random order. The examiner then assessed each scale for ease of use. Statistical analysis used Cronbach's α, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), generalized weighted κ statistic, and Kendall's coefficient of concordance. The UDRS, F-M, and GDS showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α 0.89-0.93) and good to excellent correlation among the raters (ICC range from 0.71-0.78). Inter-rater agreement was fair to excellent (Kendall's 0.54-0.87; κ 0.37-0.91) being lowest for eyes, jaw, face, and larynx. The modifying ratings (Duration in the UDRS and Provoking Factor in the F-M) showed less agreement than the motor severity ratings. Among scales, the total scores correlated (Pearson's r, 0.977-0.983). Overall, 74% of raters found the GDS the easiest to apply. The GDS with its simplicity and ease of application may be the most useful dystonia rating scale.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)303-312
Number of pages10
JournalMovement Disorders
Volume18
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dystonia
Videotape Recording
Larynx
Jaw

Keywords

  • Dystonia
  • Movement disorder
  • Outcome assessment
  • Rating scale

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Comella, C. L., Leurgans, S., Wuu, J., Stebbins T., G. T., & Chmura, T. (2003). Rating scales for dystonia: A multicenter assessment. Movement Disorders, 18(3), 303-312. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.10377

Rating scales for dystonia : A multicenter assessment. / Comella, Cynthia L.; Leurgans, Sue; Wuu, Joanne; Stebbins T., Glenn T.; Chmura, Teresa.

In: Movement Disorders, Vol. 18, No. 3, 01.03.2003, p. 303-312.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Comella, CL, Leurgans, S, Wuu, J, Stebbins T., GT & Chmura, T 2003, 'Rating scales for dystonia: A multicenter assessment', Movement Disorders, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 303-312. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.10377
Comella CL, Leurgans S, Wuu J, Stebbins T. GT, Chmura T. Rating scales for dystonia: A multicenter assessment. Movement Disorders. 2003 Mar 1;18(3):303-312. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.10377
Comella, Cynthia L. ; Leurgans, Sue ; Wuu, Joanne ; Stebbins T., Glenn T. ; Chmura, Teresa. / Rating scales for dystonia : A multicenter assessment. In: Movement Disorders. 2003 ; Vol. 18, No. 3. pp. 303-312.
@article{f0eb8176218a4f7da1718906729d91b7,
title = "Rating scales for dystonia: A multicenter assessment",
abstract = "The evaluation of dystonia requires a reliable rating scale. The widely used Fahn-Marsden Scale (F-M) has not been sufficiently tested across multiple centers and investigators. The Dystonia Study Group developed the Unified Dystonia Rating Scale (UDRS) and a Global Dystonia Rating Scale (GDS) to serve as instruments to assess dystonia severity. In this study, 25 dystonia experts evaluated the UDRS, F-M, and GDS for internal consistency and reliability. One hundred dystonia patients were videotaped using a standardized videotape protocol. Each examiner rated 20 patients using the UDRS, F-M, and GDS in random order. The examiner then assessed each scale for ease of use. Statistical analysis used Cronbach's α, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), generalized weighted κ statistic, and Kendall's coefficient of concordance. The UDRS, F-M, and GDS showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α 0.89-0.93) and good to excellent correlation among the raters (ICC range from 0.71-0.78). Inter-rater agreement was fair to excellent (Kendall's 0.54-0.87; κ 0.37-0.91) being lowest for eyes, jaw, face, and larynx. The modifying ratings (Duration in the UDRS and Provoking Factor in the F-M) showed less agreement than the motor severity ratings. Among scales, the total scores correlated (Pearson's r, 0.977-0.983). Overall, 74{\%} of raters found the GDS the easiest to apply. The GDS with its simplicity and ease of application may be the most useful dystonia rating scale.",
keywords = "Dystonia, Movement disorder, Outcome assessment, Rating scale",
author = "Comella, {Cynthia L.} and Sue Leurgans and Joanne Wuu and {Stebbins T.}, {Glenn T.} and Teresa Chmura",
year = "2003",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/mds.10377",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "303--312",
journal = "Movement Disorders",
issn = "0885-3185",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rating scales for dystonia

T2 - A multicenter assessment

AU - Comella, Cynthia L.

AU - Leurgans, Sue

AU - Wuu, Joanne

AU - Stebbins T., Glenn T.

AU - Chmura, Teresa

PY - 2003/3/1

Y1 - 2003/3/1

N2 - The evaluation of dystonia requires a reliable rating scale. The widely used Fahn-Marsden Scale (F-M) has not been sufficiently tested across multiple centers and investigators. The Dystonia Study Group developed the Unified Dystonia Rating Scale (UDRS) and a Global Dystonia Rating Scale (GDS) to serve as instruments to assess dystonia severity. In this study, 25 dystonia experts evaluated the UDRS, F-M, and GDS for internal consistency and reliability. One hundred dystonia patients were videotaped using a standardized videotape protocol. Each examiner rated 20 patients using the UDRS, F-M, and GDS in random order. The examiner then assessed each scale for ease of use. Statistical analysis used Cronbach's α, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), generalized weighted κ statistic, and Kendall's coefficient of concordance. The UDRS, F-M, and GDS showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α 0.89-0.93) and good to excellent correlation among the raters (ICC range from 0.71-0.78). Inter-rater agreement was fair to excellent (Kendall's 0.54-0.87; κ 0.37-0.91) being lowest for eyes, jaw, face, and larynx. The modifying ratings (Duration in the UDRS and Provoking Factor in the F-M) showed less agreement than the motor severity ratings. Among scales, the total scores correlated (Pearson's r, 0.977-0.983). Overall, 74% of raters found the GDS the easiest to apply. The GDS with its simplicity and ease of application may be the most useful dystonia rating scale.

AB - The evaluation of dystonia requires a reliable rating scale. The widely used Fahn-Marsden Scale (F-M) has not been sufficiently tested across multiple centers and investigators. The Dystonia Study Group developed the Unified Dystonia Rating Scale (UDRS) and a Global Dystonia Rating Scale (GDS) to serve as instruments to assess dystonia severity. In this study, 25 dystonia experts evaluated the UDRS, F-M, and GDS for internal consistency and reliability. One hundred dystonia patients were videotaped using a standardized videotape protocol. Each examiner rated 20 patients using the UDRS, F-M, and GDS in random order. The examiner then assessed each scale for ease of use. Statistical analysis used Cronbach's α, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), generalized weighted κ statistic, and Kendall's coefficient of concordance. The UDRS, F-M, and GDS showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α 0.89-0.93) and good to excellent correlation among the raters (ICC range from 0.71-0.78). Inter-rater agreement was fair to excellent (Kendall's 0.54-0.87; κ 0.37-0.91) being lowest for eyes, jaw, face, and larynx. The modifying ratings (Duration in the UDRS and Provoking Factor in the F-M) showed less agreement than the motor severity ratings. Among scales, the total scores correlated (Pearson's r, 0.977-0.983). Overall, 74% of raters found the GDS the easiest to apply. The GDS with its simplicity and ease of application may be the most useful dystonia rating scale.

KW - Dystonia

KW - Movement disorder

KW - Outcome assessment

KW - Rating scale

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037354472&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037354472&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/mds.10377

DO - 10.1002/mds.10377

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 303

EP - 312

JO - Movement Disorders

JF - Movement Disorders

SN - 0885-3185

IS - 3

ER -