Randomized Comparative Study Between Buccal Mucosal and Acellular Bladder Matrix Grafts in Complex Anterior Urethral Strictures

AbdelWahab El Kassaby, Tamer AbouShwareb, Anthony Atala

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

112 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Urethral strictures have been a reconstructive dilemma for many years due to the limited availability of tissue substitutes and incidence of recurrence. Buccal mucosal grafts have been a favored material in instances where penile skin is unavailable due to its durability and excellent graft survival. Recently collagen based matrices derived from the bladder have been used successfully in patients with stricture disease and hypospadias. We performed a randomized comparative study to assess the outcome of the acellular bladder matrix compared to buccal mucosa in patients with complex urethral strictures. Materials and Methods: Human demineralized bone matrix, obtained from cadaveric donors, was processed and prepared for use as an off-the-shelf material. Thirty patients with stricture 21 to 59 years old (mean 36.2) were enrolled and assessed using a standard protocol. The stricture length ranged from 2 to 18 cm (mean 6.9), of which 11 patients had bulbar, 7 had pendulous and 12 had combined bulbopendulous strictures. Of the 30 patients 7 had received no previous intervention while the remaining 23 had undergone 1 to 7 procedures (mean 1.9). All patients were randomized and alternatively assigned to receive either buccal mucosa or demineralized bone matrix and underwent an onlay procedure. Results: All patients except 2 who were lost during followup were followed for 18 to 36 months (mean 25). In patients with a healthy urethral bed (less than 2 prior operations) the success rate of buccal mucosa grafts (10 of 10) was similar to the bladder matrix grafts (8 of 9) in terms of patency. In patients with an unhealthy urethral bed (more than 2 prior operations) only 2 of 6 patients with a bladder matrix graft were successful, whereas all 5 patients with a buccal mucosa graft had a patent urethra. Postoperative uroflowmetry showed significant voiding improvement in both groups. Histology of the graft biopsies showed normal urethral tissue characteristics. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that the use of acellular bladder matrix is a viable option for urethral repair. Demineralized bone matrix as an off-the-shelf biomaterial achieves the best results in patients with a healthy urethral bed, no spongiofibrosis and good urethral mucosa.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1432-1436
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume179
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Urethral Stricture
Cheek
Urinary Bladder
Transplants
Mouth Mucosa
Bone Matrix
Pathologic Constriction
Inlays
Hypospadias
Biocompatible Materials
Graft Survival
Urethra
Histology
Mucous Membrane
Collagen

Keywords

  • reconstructive surgical procedures
  • urethra
  • urethral stricture

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Randomized Comparative Study Between Buccal Mucosal and Acellular Bladder Matrix Grafts in Complex Anterior Urethral Strictures. / El Kassaby, AbdelWahab; AbouShwareb, Tamer; Atala, Anthony.

In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 179, No. 4, 01.04.2008, p. 1432-1436.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

El Kassaby, AbdelWahab ; AbouShwareb, Tamer ; Atala, Anthony. / Randomized Comparative Study Between Buccal Mucosal and Acellular Bladder Matrix Grafts in Complex Anterior Urethral Strictures. In: Journal of Urology. 2008 ; Vol. 179, No. 4. pp. 1432-1436.
@article{f4f27fe7c5dd417ba29d5f59d0309bb4,
title = "Randomized Comparative Study Between Buccal Mucosal and Acellular Bladder Matrix Grafts in Complex Anterior Urethral Strictures",
abstract = "Purpose: Urethral strictures have been a reconstructive dilemma for many years due to the limited availability of tissue substitutes and incidence of recurrence. Buccal mucosal grafts have been a favored material in instances where penile skin is unavailable due to its durability and excellent graft survival. Recently collagen based matrices derived from the bladder have been used successfully in patients with stricture disease and hypospadias. We performed a randomized comparative study to assess the outcome of the acellular bladder matrix compared to buccal mucosa in patients with complex urethral strictures. Materials and Methods: Human demineralized bone matrix, obtained from cadaveric donors, was processed and prepared for use as an off-the-shelf material. Thirty patients with stricture 21 to 59 years old (mean 36.2) were enrolled and assessed using a standard protocol. The stricture length ranged from 2 to 18 cm (mean 6.9), of which 11 patients had bulbar, 7 had pendulous and 12 had combined bulbopendulous strictures. Of the 30 patients 7 had received no previous intervention while the remaining 23 had undergone 1 to 7 procedures (mean 1.9). All patients were randomized and alternatively assigned to receive either buccal mucosa or demineralized bone matrix and underwent an onlay procedure. Results: All patients except 2 who were lost during followup were followed for 18 to 36 months (mean 25). In patients with a healthy urethral bed (less than 2 prior operations) the success rate of buccal mucosa grafts (10 of 10) was similar to the bladder matrix grafts (8 of 9) in terms of patency. In patients with an unhealthy urethral bed (more than 2 prior operations) only 2 of 6 patients with a bladder matrix graft were successful, whereas all 5 patients with a buccal mucosa graft had a patent urethra. Postoperative uroflowmetry showed significant voiding improvement in both groups. Histology of the graft biopsies showed normal urethral tissue characteristics. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that the use of acellular bladder matrix is a viable option for urethral repair. Demineralized bone matrix as an off-the-shelf biomaterial achieves the best results in patients with a healthy urethral bed, no spongiofibrosis and good urethral mucosa.",
keywords = "reconstructive surgical procedures, urethra, urethral stricture",
author = "{El Kassaby}, AbdelWahab and Tamer AbouShwareb and Anthony Atala",
year = "2008",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.juro.2007.11.101",
language = "English",
volume = "179",
pages = "1432--1436",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Randomized Comparative Study Between Buccal Mucosal and Acellular Bladder Matrix Grafts in Complex Anterior Urethral Strictures

AU - El Kassaby, AbdelWahab

AU - AbouShwareb, Tamer

AU - Atala, Anthony

PY - 2008/4/1

Y1 - 2008/4/1

N2 - Purpose: Urethral strictures have been a reconstructive dilemma for many years due to the limited availability of tissue substitutes and incidence of recurrence. Buccal mucosal grafts have been a favored material in instances where penile skin is unavailable due to its durability and excellent graft survival. Recently collagen based matrices derived from the bladder have been used successfully in patients with stricture disease and hypospadias. We performed a randomized comparative study to assess the outcome of the acellular bladder matrix compared to buccal mucosa in patients with complex urethral strictures. Materials and Methods: Human demineralized bone matrix, obtained from cadaveric donors, was processed and prepared for use as an off-the-shelf material. Thirty patients with stricture 21 to 59 years old (mean 36.2) were enrolled and assessed using a standard protocol. The stricture length ranged from 2 to 18 cm (mean 6.9), of which 11 patients had bulbar, 7 had pendulous and 12 had combined bulbopendulous strictures. Of the 30 patients 7 had received no previous intervention while the remaining 23 had undergone 1 to 7 procedures (mean 1.9). All patients were randomized and alternatively assigned to receive either buccal mucosa or demineralized bone matrix and underwent an onlay procedure. Results: All patients except 2 who were lost during followup were followed for 18 to 36 months (mean 25). In patients with a healthy urethral bed (less than 2 prior operations) the success rate of buccal mucosa grafts (10 of 10) was similar to the bladder matrix grafts (8 of 9) in terms of patency. In patients with an unhealthy urethral bed (more than 2 prior operations) only 2 of 6 patients with a bladder matrix graft were successful, whereas all 5 patients with a buccal mucosa graft had a patent urethra. Postoperative uroflowmetry showed significant voiding improvement in both groups. Histology of the graft biopsies showed normal urethral tissue characteristics. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that the use of acellular bladder matrix is a viable option for urethral repair. Demineralized bone matrix as an off-the-shelf biomaterial achieves the best results in patients with a healthy urethral bed, no spongiofibrosis and good urethral mucosa.

AB - Purpose: Urethral strictures have been a reconstructive dilemma for many years due to the limited availability of tissue substitutes and incidence of recurrence. Buccal mucosal grafts have been a favored material in instances where penile skin is unavailable due to its durability and excellent graft survival. Recently collagen based matrices derived from the bladder have been used successfully in patients with stricture disease and hypospadias. We performed a randomized comparative study to assess the outcome of the acellular bladder matrix compared to buccal mucosa in patients with complex urethral strictures. Materials and Methods: Human demineralized bone matrix, obtained from cadaveric donors, was processed and prepared for use as an off-the-shelf material. Thirty patients with stricture 21 to 59 years old (mean 36.2) were enrolled and assessed using a standard protocol. The stricture length ranged from 2 to 18 cm (mean 6.9), of which 11 patients had bulbar, 7 had pendulous and 12 had combined bulbopendulous strictures. Of the 30 patients 7 had received no previous intervention while the remaining 23 had undergone 1 to 7 procedures (mean 1.9). All patients were randomized and alternatively assigned to receive either buccal mucosa or demineralized bone matrix and underwent an onlay procedure. Results: All patients except 2 who were lost during followup were followed for 18 to 36 months (mean 25). In patients with a healthy urethral bed (less than 2 prior operations) the success rate of buccal mucosa grafts (10 of 10) was similar to the bladder matrix grafts (8 of 9) in terms of patency. In patients with an unhealthy urethral bed (more than 2 prior operations) only 2 of 6 patients with a bladder matrix graft were successful, whereas all 5 patients with a buccal mucosa graft had a patent urethra. Postoperative uroflowmetry showed significant voiding improvement in both groups. Histology of the graft biopsies showed normal urethral tissue characteristics. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that the use of acellular bladder matrix is a viable option for urethral repair. Demineralized bone matrix as an off-the-shelf biomaterial achieves the best results in patients with a healthy urethral bed, no spongiofibrosis and good urethral mucosa.

KW - reconstructive surgical procedures

KW - urethra

KW - urethral stricture

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=40849118151&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=40849118151&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.juro.2007.11.101

DO - 10.1016/j.juro.2007.11.101

M3 - Article

C2 - 18295282

AN - SCOPUS:40849118151

VL - 179

SP - 1432

EP - 1436

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 4

ER -