Radiotherapy Versus Inguinofemoral Lymphadenectomy as Treatment for Vulvar Cancer Patients With Micrometastases in the Sentinel Node: Results of GROINSS-V II

Maaike H.M. Oonk, Brian Slomovitz, Peter J.W. Baldwin, Helena C. Van Doorn, Jacobus Van der Velden, Joanne A. De Hullu, Katja N. Gaarenstroom, Brigitte F.M. Slangen, Ignace Vergote, Mats Brannstrom, Eleonora B.L. Van Dorst, Willemien J. Van Driel, Ralph H. Hermans, David Nunns, Martin Widschwendter, David Nugent, Cathrine M. Holland, Aarti Sharma, Paul A. DiSilvestro, Robert MannelDorry Boll, David Cibula, Al Covens, Diane Provencher, Ingo B. Runnebaum, David Luesley, Patricia Ellis, Timothy J. Duncan, Ming Y. Tjiong, Derek J. Cruickshank, Preben Kjølhede, Charles F. Levenback, Jiri Bouda, Katharina E. Kieser, Connie Palle, Nicola M. Spirtos, David M. O'Malley, Mario M. Leitao, Melissa A. Geller, Kalyan Dhar, Viren Asher, Karl Tamussino, Daniel H. Tobias, Christer Borgfeldt, Jayanthi S. Lea, Jo Bailey, Margareta Lood, Brynhildur Eyjolfsdottir, Stephen Attard-Montalto, Krishnansu S. Tewari, Ranjit Manchanda, Pernille T. Jensen, Par Persson, Linda Van Le, Hein Putter, Geertruida H. De Bock, Bradley J. Monk, Carien L. Creutzberg, Ate G.J. Van der Zee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

PURPOSE The Groningen International Study on Sentinel nodes in Vulvar cancer (GROINSS-V)-II investigated whether inguinofemoral radiotherapy is a safe alternative to inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy (IFL) in vulvar cancer patients with a metastatic sentinel node (SN). METHODS GROINSS-V-II was a prospective multicenter phase-II single-arm treatment trial, including patients with early-stage vulvar cancer (diameter <4 cm) without signs of lymph node involvement at imaging, who had primary surgical treatment (local excision with SN biopsy). Where the SN was involved (metastasis of any size), inguinofemoral radiotherapy was given (50 Gy). The primary end point was isolated groin recurrence rate at 24 months. Stopping rules were defined for the occurrence of groin recurrences. RESULTS From December 2005 until October 2016, 1,535 eligible patients were registered. The SN showed metastasis in 322 (21.0%) patients. In June 2010, with 91 SN-positive patients included, the stopping rule was activated because the isolated groin recurrence rate in this group went above our predefined threshold. Among 10 patients with an isolated groin recurrence, nine had SN metastases > 2 mm and/or extracapsular spread. The protocol was amended so that those with SN macrometastases (>2 mm) underwent standard of care (IFL), whereas patients with SN micrometastases (#2 mm) continued to receive inguinofemoral radiotherapy. Among 160 patients with SN micrometastases, 126 received inguinofemoral radiotherapy, with an ipsilateral isolated groin recurrence rate at 2 years of 1.6%. Among 162 patients with SN macrometastases, the isolated groin recurrence rate at 2 years was 22% in those who underwent radiotherapy, and 6.9% in those who underwent IFL (P=.011). Treatment-related morbidity after radiotherapy was less frequent compared with IFL. CONCLUSION Inguinofemoral radiotherapy is a safe alternative for IFL in patients with SN micrometastases, with minimal morbidity. For patients with SN macrometastasis, radiotherapy with a total dose of 50 Gy resulted in more isolated groin recurrences compared with IFL.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3623-3632
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volume39
Issue number32
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 10 2021
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Radiotherapy Versus Inguinofemoral Lymphadenectomy as Treatment for Vulvar Cancer Patients With Micrometastases in the Sentinel Node: Results of GROINSS-V II'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this