Quantitative evaluation of regional left ventricular function by multidetector computed tomography

Jonathan Lessick, Tsur Ben-Haim, Diab Mutlak, Sobhi Abadi, Yoram Agmon, Eduard Ghersin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Because most contemporary workstations offer quantitative analysis of regional function by multidetector computed tomography, we aimed to establish typical values for normal, hypokinetic, and akinetic regions, and to establish optimal thresholds to differentiate between normal and abnormal values. METHODS: For 33 patients, quantitative regional functional parameters were compared with visual analysis by both multidetector computed tomography and echocardiography. Normal values were established to normalize for segmental variability. Optimal thresholds were established to differentiate between normal and abnormal segments by receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS: Akinetic, hypokinetic, and normokinetic segments demonstrated significant differences (P < 0.0001) for end-systolic thickness (mean [95% confidence interval], 9.4 [4.5-14.3], 11.7 [7.2-16.2], and 14.3 mm [8.2-20.3 mm]), respectively; thickening, 24% [-22% to 71%], 45% [-16% to 106%], and 82% [10%-154%]), respectively; and motion, 3.5 [-2.0 to 8.9], 6.1 [-0.2 to 12.4], and 8.5 mm [1.8-15.3 mm], respectively). Thickening performed best with area under the curve of 0.87 and sensitivity equal to specificity of 82%. Intraobserver variability was good, but interobserver variability was only moderate. CONCLUSIONS: Quantification of regional myocardial function can be performed to assist the physician in mapping left ventricular function.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)204-210
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Computer Assisted Tomography
Volume33
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2009

Fingerprint

Multidetector Computed Tomography
Left Ventricular Function
Reference Values
Observer Variation
ROC Curve
Area Under Curve
Echocardiography
Confidence Intervals
Physicians

Keywords

  • 2D echocardiography
  • Left ventricular function
  • Regional myocardial function
  • Tomography
  • X-ray computed

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Quantitative evaluation of regional left ventricular function by multidetector computed tomography. / Lessick, Jonathan; Ben-Haim, Tsur; Mutlak, Diab; Abadi, Sobhi; Agmon, Yoram; Ghersin, Eduard.

In: Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, Vol. 33, No. 2, 01.03.2009, p. 204-210.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lessick, Jonathan ; Ben-Haim, Tsur ; Mutlak, Diab ; Abadi, Sobhi ; Agmon, Yoram ; Ghersin, Eduard. / Quantitative evaluation of regional left ventricular function by multidetector computed tomography. In: Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography. 2009 ; Vol. 33, No. 2. pp. 204-210.
@article{415476afcd43470f85bd0a7dbe5b3da8,
title = "Quantitative evaluation of regional left ventricular function by multidetector computed tomography",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: Because most contemporary workstations offer quantitative analysis of regional function by multidetector computed tomography, we aimed to establish typical values for normal, hypokinetic, and akinetic regions, and to establish optimal thresholds to differentiate between normal and abnormal values. METHODS: For 33 patients, quantitative regional functional parameters were compared with visual analysis by both multidetector computed tomography and echocardiography. Normal values were established to normalize for segmental variability. Optimal thresholds were established to differentiate between normal and abnormal segments by receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS: Akinetic, hypokinetic, and normokinetic segments demonstrated significant differences (P < 0.0001) for end-systolic thickness (mean [95{\%} confidence interval], 9.4 [4.5-14.3], 11.7 [7.2-16.2], and 14.3 mm [8.2-20.3 mm]), respectively; thickening, 24{\%} [-22{\%} to 71{\%}], 45{\%} [-16{\%} to 106{\%}], and 82{\%} [10{\%}-154{\%}]), respectively; and motion, 3.5 [-2.0 to 8.9], 6.1 [-0.2 to 12.4], and 8.5 mm [1.8-15.3 mm], respectively). Thickening performed best with area under the curve of 0.87 and sensitivity equal to specificity of 82{\%}. Intraobserver variability was good, but interobserver variability was only moderate. CONCLUSIONS: Quantification of regional myocardial function can be performed to assist the physician in mapping left ventricular function.",
keywords = "2D echocardiography, Left ventricular function, Regional myocardial function, Tomography, X-ray computed",
author = "Jonathan Lessick and Tsur Ben-Haim and Diab Mutlak and Sobhi Abadi and Yoram Agmon and Eduard Ghersin",
year = "2009",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181772731",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "204--210",
journal = "Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography",
issn = "0363-8715",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantitative evaluation of regional left ventricular function by multidetector computed tomography

AU - Lessick, Jonathan

AU - Ben-Haim, Tsur

AU - Mutlak, Diab

AU - Abadi, Sobhi

AU - Agmon, Yoram

AU - Ghersin, Eduard

PY - 2009/3/1

Y1 - 2009/3/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: Because most contemporary workstations offer quantitative analysis of regional function by multidetector computed tomography, we aimed to establish typical values for normal, hypokinetic, and akinetic regions, and to establish optimal thresholds to differentiate between normal and abnormal values. METHODS: For 33 patients, quantitative regional functional parameters were compared with visual analysis by both multidetector computed tomography and echocardiography. Normal values were established to normalize for segmental variability. Optimal thresholds were established to differentiate between normal and abnormal segments by receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS: Akinetic, hypokinetic, and normokinetic segments demonstrated significant differences (P < 0.0001) for end-systolic thickness (mean [95% confidence interval], 9.4 [4.5-14.3], 11.7 [7.2-16.2], and 14.3 mm [8.2-20.3 mm]), respectively; thickening, 24% [-22% to 71%], 45% [-16% to 106%], and 82% [10%-154%]), respectively; and motion, 3.5 [-2.0 to 8.9], 6.1 [-0.2 to 12.4], and 8.5 mm [1.8-15.3 mm], respectively). Thickening performed best with area under the curve of 0.87 and sensitivity equal to specificity of 82%. Intraobserver variability was good, but interobserver variability was only moderate. CONCLUSIONS: Quantification of regional myocardial function can be performed to assist the physician in mapping left ventricular function.

AB - OBJECTIVE: Because most contemporary workstations offer quantitative analysis of regional function by multidetector computed tomography, we aimed to establish typical values for normal, hypokinetic, and akinetic regions, and to establish optimal thresholds to differentiate between normal and abnormal values. METHODS: For 33 patients, quantitative regional functional parameters were compared with visual analysis by both multidetector computed tomography and echocardiography. Normal values were established to normalize for segmental variability. Optimal thresholds were established to differentiate between normal and abnormal segments by receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS: Akinetic, hypokinetic, and normokinetic segments demonstrated significant differences (P < 0.0001) for end-systolic thickness (mean [95% confidence interval], 9.4 [4.5-14.3], 11.7 [7.2-16.2], and 14.3 mm [8.2-20.3 mm]), respectively; thickening, 24% [-22% to 71%], 45% [-16% to 106%], and 82% [10%-154%]), respectively; and motion, 3.5 [-2.0 to 8.9], 6.1 [-0.2 to 12.4], and 8.5 mm [1.8-15.3 mm], respectively). Thickening performed best with area under the curve of 0.87 and sensitivity equal to specificity of 82%. Intraobserver variability was good, but interobserver variability was only moderate. CONCLUSIONS: Quantification of regional myocardial function can be performed to assist the physician in mapping left ventricular function.

KW - 2D echocardiography

KW - Left ventricular function

KW - Regional myocardial function

KW - Tomography

KW - X-ray computed

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=64749085409&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=64749085409&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181772731

DO - 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181772731

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 204

EP - 210

JO - Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

JF - Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

SN - 0363-8715

IS - 2

ER -