Abstract
Purpose: The impact of radical prostatectomy and external beam radiotherapy on the quality of life of patients was compared. Materials and Methods: A total of 136 patients underwent radical prostatectomy and 60 underwent external beam radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. Patients were asked to complete a questionnaire containing The Functional Living Index: Cancer, the Profile of Moods States, and a series of questions evaluating bladder, bowel and sexual function. Results: The radical prostatectomy group had worse sexual function and urinary incontinence, while the external beam radiotherapy group had worse bowel function. Of the patients 90 percent from both groups stated that they would undergo the treatment again. Conclusions: Radical prostatectomy and external beam radiotherapy have comparable impact upon quality of life.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1420-1425 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | The Journal of Urology |
| Volume | 154 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 1 1995 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Urology
Cite this
Quality of Life : Radical Prostatectomy Versus Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer. / Lim, Arthur J.; Brandon, Alfred H.; Fiedler, Jeffrey; Brickman, Andrew L.; Boyer, Cynthia I.; Raub, William A.; Soloway, Mark S.
In: The Journal of Urology, Vol. 154, No. 4, 01.01.1995, p. 1420-1425.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Quality of Life
T2 - Radical Prostatectomy Versus Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer
AU - Lim, Arthur J.
AU - Brandon, Alfred H.
AU - Fiedler, Jeffrey
AU - Brickman, Andrew L.
AU - Boyer, Cynthia I.
AU - Raub, William A.
AU - Soloway, Mark S.
PY - 1995/1/1
Y1 - 1995/1/1
N2 - Purpose: The impact of radical prostatectomy and external beam radiotherapy on the quality of life of patients was compared. Materials and Methods: A total of 136 patients underwent radical prostatectomy and 60 underwent external beam radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. Patients were asked to complete a questionnaire containing The Functional Living Index: Cancer, the Profile of Moods States, and a series of questions evaluating bladder, bowel and sexual function. Results: The radical prostatectomy group had worse sexual function and urinary incontinence, while the external beam radiotherapy group had worse bowel function. Of the patients 90 percent from both groups stated that they would undergo the treatment again. Conclusions: Radical prostatectomy and external beam radiotherapy have comparable impact upon quality of life.
AB - Purpose: The impact of radical prostatectomy and external beam radiotherapy on the quality of life of patients was compared. Materials and Methods: A total of 136 patients underwent radical prostatectomy and 60 underwent external beam radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. Patients were asked to complete a questionnaire containing The Functional Living Index: Cancer, the Profile of Moods States, and a series of questions evaluating bladder, bowel and sexual function. Results: The radical prostatectomy group had worse sexual function and urinary incontinence, while the external beam radiotherapy group had worse bowel function. Of the patients 90 percent from both groups stated that they would undergo the treatment again. Conclusions: Radical prostatectomy and external beam radiotherapy have comparable impact upon quality of life.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029121350&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029121350&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)66881-2
DO - 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)66881-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 7658548
AN - SCOPUS:0029121350
VL - 154
SP - 1420
EP - 1425
JO - Journal of Urology
JF - Journal of Urology
SN - 0022-5347
IS - 4
ER -