Quality of life 12 months after radical prostatectomy

K. G. Braslis, C. Santa‐Cruz, A. L. Brickman, M. S. Soloway

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

109 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the impact of radical prostatectomy (RP) upon quality of life (QOL) in patients with prostate cancer. Patients and methods: Seventy-nine patients with prostate cancer were recruited to evaluate the impact of RP upon QOL. The patients comprised two groups: the first group (n = 51) was evaluated 12 months or longer after RP; and the second group (n = 28) was evaluated 1 month prior to RP. All patients completed two previously reported DOL measures: the Functional Living Index Cancer (FLIC) and Profile of Mood States (POMS), and a series of questions which evaluated bladder, bowel and sexual function. Results: Comparison of patients before RP with those after RP at 12 month follow-up revealed significant (P < 0.05) deterioration in sexual function, continence and hardship scores following RP while tension scores improved significantly. Although 10 other subscale parameters were analysed, no other differences were observed. Of the 51 post-RP patients, 46 (90%) stated that given a choice they would have their surgery again. Conclusion: The results reported show that RP has minimal overall impact upon patient QOL. Although minimal voiding and bowel dysfunction was reported, many patients were dissatisfied with post-operative sexual function.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)48-53
Number of pages6
JournalBritish Journal of Urology
Volume75
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1995

Keywords

  • quality of life
  • radical prostatectomy
  • sexual function

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Quality of life 12 months after radical prostatectomy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Braslis, K. G., Santa‐Cruz, C., Brickman, A. L., & Soloway, M. S. (1995). Quality of life 12 months after radical prostatectomy. British Journal of Urology, 75(1), 48-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.1995.tb07231.x