Putting revenge and forgiveness in an evolutionary context

Michael E. McCullough, Robert Kurzban, Benjamin A. Tabak

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

21 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this response, we address eight issues concerning our proposal that human minds contain adaptations for revenge and forgiveness. Specifically, we discuss (a) the inferences that are and are not licensed by patterns of contemporary behavioral data in the context of the adaptationist approach; (b) the theoretical pitfalls of conflating proximate and ultimate causation; (c) the role of development in the production of adaptations; (d) the implications of proposing that the brain's cognitive systems are fundamentally computational in nature; (e) our preferred method for considering the role of individual differences in computational systems; (f) applications of our proposal to understanding conflicts between groups; (g) the possible implications of our views for understanding the operation of contemporary criminal justice systems; and (h) the question of whether people ever genuinely forgive.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)41-58
Number of pages18
JournalBehavioral and Brain Sciences
Volume36
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2013

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Physiology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Putting revenge and forgiveness in an evolutionary context'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this