PUBS: Pulsatility-based segmentation of lumens conducting non-steady flow

Noam Alperin, Sang Hoon Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

87 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Dynamic velocity-encoded phase-contrast MRI (PC-MRI) techniques are being used increasingly to quantify pulsatile flows for a variety of clinical applications. Studies suggest that the reliability of flow quantitation with PC-MRI appears to be dominated by the consistency in the delineation of the lumen boundary. An automated method that utilizes both spatial and temporal information has been developed for improved accuracy and reproducibility. The method's accuracy was evaluated using a flow phantom with 8- and 5-mm-diameter lumens at two different flow rates. The reproducibility of the method was further evaluated with arterial, venous, and cerebrospinal fluid flow data from human subjects. The results were compared with measurements obtained manually by observers of different skill levels. Measurement values obtained manually were consistently smaller than those obtained with the pulsatility-based segmentation (PUBS) method. For the 8-mm lumen, significant improvements in measurement accuracy were obtained. Average lumen area measurement errors of about 18% for the high and low flows, obtained manually by a skilled observer, were reduced to 2.9% and 4.8%, respectively. For the 5-mm lumen, the skilled observer underestimated the lumen area by 13%, while the PUBS method overestimated the lumen area by 28%. Overestimated lumen area measurements for the smaller lumen are attributed to the partial-volume effect. There was significantly less measurement variability with the PUBS method. An average fourfold reduction in interobserver measurement variability was obtained with the new method.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)934-944
Number of pages11
JournalMagnetic Resonance in Medicine
Volume49
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Pulsatile Flow
Observer Variation
Cerebrospinal Fluid

Keywords

  • Flow quantitation
  • Lumen segmentation
  • Phase-contrast MRI
  • Pulsatile flow
  • Unbiased thresholding

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

PUBS : Pulsatility-based segmentation of lumens conducting non-steady flow. / Alperin, Noam; Lee, Sang Hoon.

In: Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Vol. 49, No. 5, 01.05.2003, p. 934-944.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e05225fbbf544d3cbc8a99f34bc07398,
title = "PUBS: Pulsatility-based segmentation of lumens conducting non-steady flow",
abstract = "Dynamic velocity-encoded phase-contrast MRI (PC-MRI) techniques are being used increasingly to quantify pulsatile flows for a variety of clinical applications. Studies suggest that the reliability of flow quantitation with PC-MRI appears to be dominated by the consistency in the delineation of the lumen boundary. An automated method that utilizes both spatial and temporal information has been developed for improved accuracy and reproducibility. The method's accuracy was evaluated using a flow phantom with 8- and 5-mm-diameter lumens at two different flow rates. The reproducibility of the method was further evaluated with arterial, venous, and cerebrospinal fluid flow data from human subjects. The results were compared with measurements obtained manually by observers of different skill levels. Measurement values obtained manually were consistently smaller than those obtained with the pulsatility-based segmentation (PUBS) method. For the 8-mm lumen, significant improvements in measurement accuracy were obtained. Average lumen area measurement errors of about 18{\%} for the high and low flows, obtained manually by a skilled observer, were reduced to 2.9{\%} and 4.8{\%}, respectively. For the 5-mm lumen, the skilled observer underestimated the lumen area by 13{\%}, while the PUBS method overestimated the lumen area by 28{\%}. Overestimated lumen area measurements for the smaller lumen are attributed to the partial-volume effect. There was significantly less measurement variability with the PUBS method. An average fourfold reduction in interobserver measurement variability was obtained with the new method.",
keywords = "Flow quantitation, Lumen segmentation, Phase-contrast MRI, Pulsatile flow, Unbiased thresholding",
author = "Noam Alperin and Lee, {Sang Hoon}",
year = "2003",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/mrm.10455",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "934--944",
journal = "Magnetic Resonance in Medicine",
issn = "0740-3194",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - PUBS

T2 - Pulsatility-based segmentation of lumens conducting non-steady flow

AU - Alperin, Noam

AU - Lee, Sang Hoon

PY - 2003/5/1

Y1 - 2003/5/1

N2 - Dynamic velocity-encoded phase-contrast MRI (PC-MRI) techniques are being used increasingly to quantify pulsatile flows for a variety of clinical applications. Studies suggest that the reliability of flow quantitation with PC-MRI appears to be dominated by the consistency in the delineation of the lumen boundary. An automated method that utilizes both spatial and temporal information has been developed for improved accuracy and reproducibility. The method's accuracy was evaluated using a flow phantom with 8- and 5-mm-diameter lumens at two different flow rates. The reproducibility of the method was further evaluated with arterial, venous, and cerebrospinal fluid flow data from human subjects. The results were compared with measurements obtained manually by observers of different skill levels. Measurement values obtained manually were consistently smaller than those obtained with the pulsatility-based segmentation (PUBS) method. For the 8-mm lumen, significant improvements in measurement accuracy were obtained. Average lumen area measurement errors of about 18% for the high and low flows, obtained manually by a skilled observer, were reduced to 2.9% and 4.8%, respectively. For the 5-mm lumen, the skilled observer underestimated the lumen area by 13%, while the PUBS method overestimated the lumen area by 28%. Overestimated lumen area measurements for the smaller lumen are attributed to the partial-volume effect. There was significantly less measurement variability with the PUBS method. An average fourfold reduction in interobserver measurement variability was obtained with the new method.

AB - Dynamic velocity-encoded phase-contrast MRI (PC-MRI) techniques are being used increasingly to quantify pulsatile flows for a variety of clinical applications. Studies suggest that the reliability of flow quantitation with PC-MRI appears to be dominated by the consistency in the delineation of the lumen boundary. An automated method that utilizes both spatial and temporal information has been developed for improved accuracy and reproducibility. The method's accuracy was evaluated using a flow phantom with 8- and 5-mm-diameter lumens at two different flow rates. The reproducibility of the method was further evaluated with arterial, venous, and cerebrospinal fluid flow data from human subjects. The results were compared with measurements obtained manually by observers of different skill levels. Measurement values obtained manually were consistently smaller than those obtained with the pulsatility-based segmentation (PUBS) method. For the 8-mm lumen, significant improvements in measurement accuracy were obtained. Average lumen area measurement errors of about 18% for the high and low flows, obtained manually by a skilled observer, were reduced to 2.9% and 4.8%, respectively. For the 5-mm lumen, the skilled observer underestimated the lumen area by 13%, while the PUBS method overestimated the lumen area by 28%. Overestimated lumen area measurements for the smaller lumen are attributed to the partial-volume effect. There was significantly less measurement variability with the PUBS method. An average fourfold reduction in interobserver measurement variability was obtained with the new method.

KW - Flow quantitation

KW - Lumen segmentation

KW - Phase-contrast MRI

KW - Pulsatile flow

KW - Unbiased thresholding

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037407672&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037407672&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/mrm.10455

DO - 10.1002/mrm.10455

M3 - Article

C2 - 12704777

AN - SCOPUS:0037407672

VL - 49

SP - 934

EP - 944

JO - Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

JF - Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

SN - 0740-3194

IS - 5

ER -