Publius's Guile and the Paranoid Style

Joseph Parent

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

When foreign dangers become domestic threats, how should governments respond? This article turns to the past to better understand the present. Three rebellions in early American history—Shays's Rebellion, the Whiskey Rebellion, and Fries's Rebellion—illustrate how similar domestic events elicited different governmental responses, depending on changes in the international environment. The ethical implications are mixed, but the policy recommendations suggest that quick executive action and slow judicial action are appropriate responses. A necessary cause of these events, both in government officials and those opposing them, is traced back to imbalances of power. The argument builds on Richard Hofstadter's Paranoid Style in American Politics, and elaborates the strategic logic of political paranoia.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)219-238
Number of pages20
JournalPublic Integrity
Volume12
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2010

Fingerprint

event
threat
cause
politics
present
Rebellion
Government
Causes
Paranoia
Danger
Threat
American Politics
Logic
Imbalance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Law
  • Public Administration
  • Business and International Management
  • Philosophy

Cite this

Publius's Guile and the Paranoid Style. / Parent, Joseph.

In: Public Integrity, Vol. 12, No. 3, 01.07.2010, p. 219-238.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Parent, Joseph. / Publius's Guile and the Paranoid Style. In: Public Integrity. 2010 ; Vol. 12, No. 3. pp. 219-238.
@article{774adad8dd194938ab5e0e9b5a1b576e,
title = "Publius's Guile and the Paranoid Style",
abstract = "When foreign dangers become domestic threats, how should governments respond? This article turns to the past to better understand the present. Three rebellions in early American history—Shays's Rebellion, the Whiskey Rebellion, and Fries's Rebellion—illustrate how similar domestic events elicited different governmental responses, depending on changes in the international environment. The ethical implications are mixed, but the policy recommendations suggest that quick executive action and slow judicial action are appropriate responses. A necessary cause of these events, both in government officials and those opposing them, is traced back to imbalances of power. The argument builds on Richard Hofstadter's Paranoid Style in American Politics, and elaborates the strategic logic of political paranoia.",
author = "Joseph Parent",
year = "2010",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2753/PIN1099-9922120302",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "219--238",
journal = "Public Integrity",
issn = "1099-9922",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Publius's Guile and the Paranoid Style

AU - Parent, Joseph

PY - 2010/7/1

Y1 - 2010/7/1

N2 - When foreign dangers become domestic threats, how should governments respond? This article turns to the past to better understand the present. Three rebellions in early American history—Shays's Rebellion, the Whiskey Rebellion, and Fries's Rebellion—illustrate how similar domestic events elicited different governmental responses, depending on changes in the international environment. The ethical implications are mixed, but the policy recommendations suggest that quick executive action and slow judicial action are appropriate responses. A necessary cause of these events, both in government officials and those opposing them, is traced back to imbalances of power. The argument builds on Richard Hofstadter's Paranoid Style in American Politics, and elaborates the strategic logic of political paranoia.

AB - When foreign dangers become domestic threats, how should governments respond? This article turns to the past to better understand the present. Three rebellions in early American history—Shays's Rebellion, the Whiskey Rebellion, and Fries's Rebellion—illustrate how similar domestic events elicited different governmental responses, depending on changes in the international environment. The ethical implications are mixed, but the policy recommendations suggest that quick executive action and slow judicial action are appropriate responses. A necessary cause of these events, both in government officials and those opposing them, is traced back to imbalances of power. The argument builds on Richard Hofstadter's Paranoid Style in American Politics, and elaborates the strategic logic of political paranoia.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050411978&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85050411978&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2753/PIN1099-9922120302

DO - 10.2753/PIN1099-9922120302

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85050411978

VL - 12

SP - 219

EP - 238

JO - Public Integrity

JF - Public Integrity

SN - 1099-9922

IS - 3

ER -