Psychosocial issues: An international survey of physician attitudes and practice in regard to revealing the diagnosis of cancer

Jimmie C. Holland, Jimmie C. Holland, Natalie Geary, Anthony Marchini, Susan Tross

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

177 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In 1984, questionnaires were sent to members of the International Psycho-Oncology Society concerning the practice in their country with regard to revealing the diagnosis of cancer to patients, their opinion about the effect of their policy, and their impression of local trends and attitudes toward cancer. Data from 90 respondents from 20 countries revealed that use of the word (cancer) was often avoided in discussions with the patient. Words commonly substituted for cancer were those that implied a (swelling) (e.g., tumor, growth, lump), and (inflammation,) or a pathophysiologic change (blood disease, precancerous, unclean tissue). Oncologists estimated that a low percentage (<40% of their colleagues revealed the word cancer in Africa, France, Hungary, Italy, Japan, Panama, Portugal, and Spain. Oncologists from Austria, Denmark, Finland, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, and Switzerland, estimated the percentage to be high (> 80% However, in all countries, the majority of physicians tell the family the diagnosis. The majority (90% reported a trend toward increased telling of the diagnosis, due to greater patient information and expectations, and increased physician openess in using the word cancer. Most (68% felt that the overall effect of revealing the diagnosis was positive. While emotional distress was transiently greater when patients were told, there were positive effects concerning coping, compliance, tolerance of treatment, planning for future, communication with physicians and others, and improved prognosis. The transient negative effects were depression, anxiety, and anger. It is important to recognize that efforts to find the (correct) position about revealing or concealing cancer diagnosis must recognize that the language between doctor and patient is constrained by cultural norms. Communication is likely to be far less dependent upon the specific words used then upon the meaning that is conveyed by the doctor.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)151-154
Number of pages4
JournalCancer Investigation
Volume5
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1987

Fingerprint

Physicians
Neoplasms
Communication
Hematologic Diseases
Family Physicians
Anger
Surveys and Questionnaires
Compliance
Language
Anxiety
Depression
Inflammation
Growth
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cancer Research
  • Oncology

Cite this

Psychosocial issues : An international survey of physician attitudes and practice in regard to revealing the diagnosis of cancer. / Holland, Jimmie C.; Holland, Jimmie C.; Geary, Natalie; Marchini, Anthony; Tross, Susan.

In: Cancer Investigation, Vol. 5, No. 2, 1987, p. 151-154.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Holland, Jimmie C. ; Holland, Jimmie C. ; Geary, Natalie ; Marchini, Anthony ; Tross, Susan. / Psychosocial issues : An international survey of physician attitudes and practice in regard to revealing the diagnosis of cancer. In: Cancer Investigation. 1987 ; Vol. 5, No. 2. pp. 151-154.
@article{e246ede2b2f64c82a2c45558676c5ffe,
title = "Psychosocial issues: An international survey of physician attitudes and practice in regard to revealing the diagnosis of cancer",
abstract = "In 1984, questionnaires were sent to members of the International Psycho-Oncology Society concerning the practice in their country with regard to revealing the diagnosis of cancer to patients, their opinion about the effect of their policy, and their impression of local trends and attitudes toward cancer. Data from 90 respondents from 20 countries revealed that use of the word (cancer) was often avoided in discussions with the patient. Words commonly substituted for cancer were those that implied a (swelling) (e.g., tumor, growth, lump), and (inflammation,) or a pathophysiologic change (blood disease, precancerous, unclean tissue). Oncologists estimated that a low percentage (<40{\%} of their colleagues revealed the word cancer in Africa, France, Hungary, Italy, Japan, Panama, Portugal, and Spain. Oncologists from Austria, Denmark, Finland, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, and Switzerland, estimated the percentage to be high (> 80{\%} However, in all countries, the majority of physicians tell the family the diagnosis. The majority (90{\%} reported a trend toward increased telling of the diagnosis, due to greater patient information and expectations, and increased physician openess in using the word cancer. Most (68{\%} felt that the overall effect of revealing the diagnosis was positive. While emotional distress was transiently greater when patients were told, there were positive effects concerning coping, compliance, tolerance of treatment, planning for future, communication with physicians and others, and improved prognosis. The transient negative effects were depression, anxiety, and anger. It is important to recognize that efforts to find the (correct) position about revealing or concealing cancer diagnosis must recognize that the language between doctor and patient is constrained by cultural norms. Communication is likely to be far less dependent upon the specific words used then upon the meaning that is conveyed by the doctor.",
author = "Holland, {Jimmie C.} and Holland, {Jimmie C.} and Natalie Geary and Anthony Marchini and Susan Tross",
year = "1987",
doi = "10.3109/07357908709018468",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "151--154",
journal = "Cancer Investigation",
issn = "0735-7907",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Psychosocial issues

T2 - An international survey of physician attitudes and practice in regard to revealing the diagnosis of cancer

AU - Holland, Jimmie C.

AU - Holland, Jimmie C.

AU - Geary, Natalie

AU - Marchini, Anthony

AU - Tross, Susan

PY - 1987

Y1 - 1987

N2 - In 1984, questionnaires were sent to members of the International Psycho-Oncology Society concerning the practice in their country with regard to revealing the diagnosis of cancer to patients, their opinion about the effect of their policy, and their impression of local trends and attitudes toward cancer. Data from 90 respondents from 20 countries revealed that use of the word (cancer) was often avoided in discussions with the patient. Words commonly substituted for cancer were those that implied a (swelling) (e.g., tumor, growth, lump), and (inflammation,) or a pathophysiologic change (blood disease, precancerous, unclean tissue). Oncologists estimated that a low percentage (<40% of their colleagues revealed the word cancer in Africa, France, Hungary, Italy, Japan, Panama, Portugal, and Spain. Oncologists from Austria, Denmark, Finland, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, and Switzerland, estimated the percentage to be high (> 80% However, in all countries, the majority of physicians tell the family the diagnosis. The majority (90% reported a trend toward increased telling of the diagnosis, due to greater patient information and expectations, and increased physician openess in using the word cancer. Most (68% felt that the overall effect of revealing the diagnosis was positive. While emotional distress was transiently greater when patients were told, there were positive effects concerning coping, compliance, tolerance of treatment, planning for future, communication with physicians and others, and improved prognosis. The transient negative effects were depression, anxiety, and anger. It is important to recognize that efforts to find the (correct) position about revealing or concealing cancer diagnosis must recognize that the language between doctor and patient is constrained by cultural norms. Communication is likely to be far less dependent upon the specific words used then upon the meaning that is conveyed by the doctor.

AB - In 1984, questionnaires were sent to members of the International Psycho-Oncology Society concerning the practice in their country with regard to revealing the diagnosis of cancer to patients, their opinion about the effect of their policy, and their impression of local trends and attitudes toward cancer. Data from 90 respondents from 20 countries revealed that use of the word (cancer) was often avoided in discussions with the patient. Words commonly substituted for cancer were those that implied a (swelling) (e.g., tumor, growth, lump), and (inflammation,) or a pathophysiologic change (blood disease, precancerous, unclean tissue). Oncologists estimated that a low percentage (<40% of their colleagues revealed the word cancer in Africa, France, Hungary, Italy, Japan, Panama, Portugal, and Spain. Oncologists from Austria, Denmark, Finland, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, and Switzerland, estimated the percentage to be high (> 80% However, in all countries, the majority of physicians tell the family the diagnosis. The majority (90% reported a trend toward increased telling of the diagnosis, due to greater patient information and expectations, and increased physician openess in using the word cancer. Most (68% felt that the overall effect of revealing the diagnosis was positive. While emotional distress was transiently greater when patients were told, there were positive effects concerning coping, compliance, tolerance of treatment, planning for future, communication with physicians and others, and improved prognosis. The transient negative effects were depression, anxiety, and anger. It is important to recognize that efforts to find the (correct) position about revealing or concealing cancer diagnosis must recognize that the language between doctor and patient is constrained by cultural norms. Communication is likely to be far less dependent upon the specific words used then upon the meaning that is conveyed by the doctor.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023236906&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023236906&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/07357908709018468

DO - 10.3109/07357908709018468

M3 - Article

C2 - 3607572

AN - SCOPUS:0023236906

VL - 5

SP - 151

EP - 154

JO - Cancer Investigation

JF - Cancer Investigation

SN - 0735-7907

IS - 2

ER -