Abstract
Reviews evidence concerning the validity, reliability, and scaling adequacy of 4 versions of the Ohio State leadership scales. A number of shortcomings are noted, due either to the lack of relevant data (e.g., with respect to construct validity) or actual inadequacies of the scales (e.g., item response skewedness). The 4 versions are shown to be substantially different psychometrically; although suffering from some deficiencies and requiring further refinement, one version of the scales appears sounder than the others. (48 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 756-765 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Psychological Bulletin |
| Volume | 81 |
| Issue number | 11 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Nov 1974 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- validity & reliability & scaling, 4 versions of Ohio State leadership scales
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- History and Philosophy of Science
- Psychology(all)
Cite this
Psychometric properties of the Ohio State leadership scales. / Schriesheim, Chester; Kerr, Steven.
In: Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 81, No. 11, 11.1974, p. 756-765.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Psychometric properties of the Ohio State leadership scales
AU - Schriesheim, Chester
AU - Kerr, Steven
PY - 1974/11
Y1 - 1974/11
N2 - Reviews evidence concerning the validity, reliability, and scaling adequacy of 4 versions of the Ohio State leadership scales. A number of shortcomings are noted, due either to the lack of relevant data (e.g., with respect to construct validity) or actual inadequacies of the scales (e.g., item response skewedness). The 4 versions are shown to be substantially different psychometrically; although suffering from some deficiencies and requiring further refinement, one version of the scales appears sounder than the others. (48 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).
AB - Reviews evidence concerning the validity, reliability, and scaling adequacy of 4 versions of the Ohio State leadership scales. A number of shortcomings are noted, due either to the lack of relevant data (e.g., with respect to construct validity) or actual inadequacies of the scales (e.g., item response skewedness). The 4 versions are shown to be substantially different psychometrically; although suffering from some deficiencies and requiring further refinement, one version of the scales appears sounder than the others. (48 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).
KW - validity & reliability & scaling, 4 versions of Ohio State leadership scales
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0016130630&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0016130630&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/h0037277
DO - 10.1037/h0037277
M3 - Article
C2 - 4612572
AN - SCOPUS:0016130630
VL - 81
SP - 756
EP - 765
JO - Psychological Bulletin
JF - Psychological Bulletin
SN - 0033-2909
IS - 11
ER -